Democracy Evolving: A Diversity of Institutional Contradictions Transforming Political Economy

References

• Arrow, Kenneth J. Social Choice and Individual Values. Second edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, Clarence. The Theory of Economic Progress. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Duncan. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, [1958] 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Brams, Steven J. and Peter C. Fishburn. “Approval Voting.” American Political Science Review 72, 3 (1978): 831-847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brams, Steven J. and Peter C. Fishburn. “Going from Theory to Practice: The Mixed Success of Approval Voting.” Social Choice and Welfare 25, 2 (2005): 457-474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Doug. “Thorstein Veblen Meets Eduard Bernstein: Toward an Institutionalist Theory of Mobilization Politics.” Journal of Economic Issues 25, 3 (1991): 689-708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. Communication Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Catephores, George. “The Imperious Austrian: Schumpeter as Bourgeois Marxist.” New Left Review 205 (1994): 3-30.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alisa, Giacomo, Federico Demaria and Giorgos Kallis. Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. “General Introduction: Reinventing Social Emancipation: Toward New Manifestos.” In Democratizing Democracy: Beyond the Liberal Democratic Canon, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos, pp. xvii-xxxiv. New York, NY: Verso, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, Boaventura, ed. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. New York, NY: Verso, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, Wolfram. “The Process and a Simple Logic of ‘Meso’: Emergence and the Co-Evolution of Institutions and Group Size.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 (2010) 445-477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruchy, Allan. “Law, Politics, and Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 7, 4 (1973): 623-643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flórez Alonso, Margarita. “Can We Protect Traditional Knowledges.” In Another Knowledge Is possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos, pp. 249-271. New York, NY: Verso, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1. Handlungsrationalität und Rationalisierung. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hanappi, Hardy. “Schumpeter.” In Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, edited by Michael Dietrich and Jackie Krafft, pp. 62-70. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Held, David. Models of Democracy. Second edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, Eric. How to Change the World: Tales of Marx and Marxism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kapeller, Jakob and Leonhard Dobusch. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 46, 4 (2012): 1035-1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerschner, Christian. “Economic De-Growth vs. Steady-State economy.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (2010): 544-551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Philip and Edythe Miller. “Concepts of Value, Efficiency, and Democracy in Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 30, 1 (1996): 267-277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, Jack and James Johnson. The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Louise. Citizen: Jane Addams and the Struggle for Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Second edition. New York, NY: Verso, [1985] 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp, [1852] 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin Books, [1848] 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Milios, John. “Social Classes in Classical and Marxist Political Economy.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 59, 2 (2000): 283-302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. New York, NY: Verso, [2000] 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Books, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Robert. Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Manfred G. Demokratietheorien (5. Aufl.). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph. Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie (7. Aufl.). Tübingen, Germany: Francke, [1950] 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, [1954] 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. “Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination.” Econometrica 45, 1 (1977): 53-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. “The Possibility of Social Choice.” American Economic Review 89, 3 (1999): 349-378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shionoya, Yuichi. “Schumpeter and Evolution: An Ontological Exploration.” In Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution: Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development, edited by Yuichi Shionoya and Tamotsu Nishizawa, pp. 15-35. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, Vandana. Biodiversity, Intellectual Property Rights, and Globalization. In Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos, pp. 272-287. New York, NY: Verso, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Warren. Range Voting. Storevoting.net, 2000. Available at http://scorevoting.net/WarrenSmithPages/homepage/rangevote.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andrew. “Transforming Power: Social Science and the Politics of Energy Choices.” Energy Research & Social Science 1 (2014): 83-95.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Alan. Mathematics and Politics: Strategy, Voting, Power and Proof. Second edition. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, Rick. “The Neoinstrumental Theory of Democracy.” Journal of Economic Issues 21, 3 (1987): 1379-1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tool, Marc. “A Social Value Theory in Neoinstitutional Econonics.” Journal of Economic Issues 11, 4 (1977): 823-846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. Theory of Business Enterprise. Gloucester, UK: Dodo Press, [1904] 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. Kila, MT: Kessinger Publishing, [1914] 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wäckerle, Manuel. The Foundations of Evolutionary Institutional Economics: Generic Institutionalism. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (5. Aufl.). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck, [1921] 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Erik. Envisioning Real Utopias. New York, NY: Verso, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zolo, Danilo. Democracy and Complexity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar