Toward Generalized Evolutionism: Beyond “Generalized Darwinism” and Its Critics

References

• Aldrich, Howard E., Geoffrey M. Hodgson, David L. Hull, Thorbjørn Knudsen, Joel Mokyr and Viktor J. Vanberg. “In Defense of Generalized Darwinism.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18, 5 (2008): 577–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badyaev, Alexander. “Maternal Effects as Generators of Evolutionary Change.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1133 (2008): 151–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badyaev, Alexander and Tobias Uller. “Parental Effects in Ecology and Evolution: Mechanisms, Processes, and Implications.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364 (2009): 1169–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Adrian. “Perceptions of Epigenetics.” Nature 447 (2007): 396–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blute, Marion. Darwinian Sociocultural Evolution: Solutions to Dilemmas in Cultural and Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, [1980] 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bourrant Pierrivk. “From Survivors to Replicators: Evolution by Natural Selection Revisited.” Biology & Philosophy 29, 4 (2014): 519–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, Robert and Peter Richerson. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Christopher. “Transmutability, Generalized Darwinism and the Limits to Conceptual Integration.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37, 1 (2013): 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, Richard N. and Richard Burian, eds. Genes, Organisms, Population: Controversies Over the Units of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, Richard N. and Richard Burian, eds. “The Units of Selection Revisited: The Modules of Selection.” Biology and Philosophy 14, 2 (1999): 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkworth, Martin, and Friedel Weinert, eds. Evolution 2.0: Implications of Darwinism in Philosophy and the Social and Natural Sciences. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Buenstorf Guido. “How Useful Is Generalized Darwinism as a Framework to Study Competition and Industrial Evolution?” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16, 6 (2006): 511–527.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald. “Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes.” Psychological Review 67, 6 (1960): 380–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald. “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution.” In The Foundations of Evolutionary Economics, edited by Geoffrey Hodgson, pp. 354–370. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, [1965] 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald. “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, pp. 413–463. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1974a.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald. “Unjustified Variation and Selective Retention in Scientific Discovery.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems, edited by Fancisco J. Ayala and Theodosius Dobzhansky, pp. 139–161. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974b.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John R. Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, Christian. “Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Continuity.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16, 4 (2006): 529–541.
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, Christian. “Turning Economics into an Evolutionary Science: Veblen, the Selection Metaphor, and Analogical Thinking.” Journal of Economic Issues 47, 1 (2007): 135–154.
   Google Scholar
• Danchin, Etienne. “Avatars of Information: Towards an Inclusive Evolutionary Synthesis.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28, 6 (2013): 351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danchin, Etienne, Anne Charmantier, Frances A. Champagne, Alex Mesoudi, Benoit Pujol and Simon Blanchet. “Beyond DNA: Integrating Inclusive Inheritance into an Extended Theory of Evolution.” Nature Reviews Genetics 12 (2011): 475–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. London, UK: John Murray, 1859.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, Charles. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. London, UK: John Murray, 1868.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London, UK: John Murray, 1871.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. “Universal Darwinism.” In Evolution from Molecules to Man, edited by D. S. Bendall, pp. 403–425. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. “Burying the Vehicle.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1994): 616–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, [1976] 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Jared. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York, NY: Norton, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, William H. Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Dversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, [1939] 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited by Colin Gordon. New York, NY: Pantheon, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, Mark B., Mark B. Gerstein, Can Bruce, Joel S. Rozowsky, Deyou Zheng, Jiang Du, Jan O. Korbel, Olof Emanuelsson, Zhengdong D. Zhang, Sherman Weissman and Michael Snyder. “What Is a Gene, Post-ENCODE? History and Updated Definition.” Genome Research 17 (2007): 669–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingeras, Thomas R. “Origin of Phenotypes: Genes and Transcripts.” Genome Research 17 (2007): 682–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, Peter. “The Replicator in Retrospect.” Biology and Philosophy 15, 3 (2000): 403–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, Peter. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, Valerie A. “Is Spencer’s Theory an Evolutionary Theory?” American Journal of Sociology 93 (1988): 1200–23.
   Google Scholar
• Halfmann, Randal, Daniel F. Jarosz, Sandra K. Jones, Amelia Chang, Alex K. Lancaster and Susan Lindquist. “Prions Are a Common Mechanism for Phenotypic Inheritance in Wild Yeasts.” Nature 482 (2012): 363–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfmann, Randal and Susan Lindquist. “Epigenetics in the Extreme: Prions and the Inheritance of Environmentally Acquired Traits.” Science 330 (2010): 629–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallpike, Christopher Robert. The Principles of Social Evolution. Clarendon, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, Joseph and Robert Boyd. “On Modeling Cognition and Culture: Why Cultural Evolution Does Not Require Replication of Representations.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 2, 2 (2002): 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Is Social Evolution Lamarckian or Darwinian?” In Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics, edited by John Laurent and John Nightingale, pp. 87–118. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Ontology.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 3 (2002): 259–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Generalizing Darwinism to Social Evolution: Some Early Attempts.” Journal of Economic Issues 39, 4 (2005): 899–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Social Evolution Is Lamarckian: right, wrong, or misleading?” 2011. Available at www.geoffrey-hodgson.info/lamarckism.htm. Accessed April 25, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. and Thorbjørn Knudsen. “Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16, 4 (2006a): 343–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “The Nature and Units of Social Selection.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16, 5 (2006b): 477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Agreeing on Generalized Darwinism: A Response to Pavel Pelikan.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22, 1 (2012): 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, David. “Individuality and Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11 (1980): 311–332.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, David. “Taking Memetics Seriously: Memetics Will Be What We Make It.” In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, edited by Robert Aunger, pp. 43–68. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, David. “Interactors Versus Vehicles.” In Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science, by David L. Hull, pp. 13–45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, [1988] 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, David. “Taking Vehicles Seriously.” In Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science, by David L. Hull, pp. 46–48. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, [1994] 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, David. Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Pres, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hussey Trevor. “Evolutionary Change and Epistemology.” Biology and Philosophy 14, 4 (1999): 561–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonka, Eva and Marion Lamb. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dmension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, David. Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonka, Eva and Gal Raz. “Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Implications for the Study of Heredity and Evolution.” Quarterly Review of Biology 84, 2 (2009): 131–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaenisch, Robert and Adrian Bird. “Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression: How the Genome Integrates Intrinsic and Environmental Signals.” Nature Genetics Supplement 33 (2003): S245–S254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, Wilhelm. “The Genotype Conception of Heredity.” American Naturalist 45 (1911): 129–159.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, Thorbjørn. “Nesting Lamarckism Within Darwinian Explanations: Necessity in Economics and Possibility in Biology?” In Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics, edited by John Laurent and John Nightingale, pp. 121–159. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kronfeldner Maria. “Is Cultural Evolution Lamarckian?” Biology and Philosophy 22 (2007): 493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronfeldner Maria. “Darwinian ‘Blind’ Hypothesis Formation Revisited.” Synthese 175 (2010): 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laland, Kevin N., John Odling-Smee and Sean Myles. “How Culture Shaped the Human Genome: Bringing Genetics and the Human Sciences Together.” Nature Reviews, Genetics 11 (2010): 13748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laland Kevin N., Tobias Uller, Marcus W. Feldman, Kim Sterelny, Gerd B. Müller, Armin Moczek, Eva Jablonka and John Odling-Smee. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B. 282 (2015): 20151019. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019. Accessed December 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste. Zoological Philosophy. Translated by Hugh Eliot. New York, NY: Hafner, 1809.
   Google Scholar
• Levit Georgy S., Uwe Hossfeld and Ulrich Witt. “Can Darwinism Be ‘Generalized’ and of What Use Would This Be?” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 21, 3 (2011): 545–562.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, Richard C. “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1 (1970): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, Richard C. “Gene, Organism, and Environment,” In Evolution from Molecules to Men. Edited by D.S. Bendall, pp. 273–285.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, Richard C. “Adaptation.” In The Dialectic Biologists. Edited by Richard Levine and Richard C. Lewontin, pp. 65–84. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd Elisabeth A. “Groups on Groups: Some Dynamics and Possible Resolution of the Units of Selection Debates in Evolutionary Biology.” Biology and Philosophy 15 (2000): 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd Elisabeth A. “Units and Levels of Selection.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by David L. Hull and Michael Ruse, pp. 44–65. Cambridge, U K: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar Amitabha, Wanda Colon Cesario, Erica White-Grindley, Huoqing Jiang, Fengzhen Ren, Mohammed “Repon” Khan, Liying Li, Edward Man-Lik Choi, Kasthuri Kannan, Fengli Guo, Jay Unruh, Brian Slaughter and Kausik Si. “Critical Role of Amyloid-like Oligomers of Drosophila Orb2 in the Persistence of Memory.” Cell 148 (2012): 515–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, Matteo. “The Inheritance of Features.” Biology & Philosophy 20, 2 (2005): 365–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith, John and Szathmary Eors. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr Ernst. “Lamarck Revisited.” Journal of History of Biology 5 (1972): 55–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayr Ernst. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Mesoudi, Alex. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe J. Stanley. Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. London, UK: Routledge, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson Richard R. “Evolutionary Social Sciences and Universal Darwinism.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16, 6 (2006): 491–510.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson Richard R. “Universal Darwinism and Evolutionary Social Science.” Biology and Philosophy 22, 1 (2007a): 73–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson Richard R. “Comment on: Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Description of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17, 4 (2007b): 349–352.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Michael J. and Kevin N. Laland. “Genes, Culture and Agriculture: An Example of Human Niche Construction.” Current Anthropology 53, 4 (2011): 434–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odling-Smee, John. “Niche Inheritance.” In Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller, pp. 175–207. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Odling-Smee, John and Kevin N. Laland. “Ecological Inheritance and Cultural Inheritance: What Are They and How Do They Differ.” Biological Theory 6, 3 (2011): 220–30.
   Google Scholar
• Odling-Smee, John, Kevin N. Laland and Marcus W. Feldman. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Okasha Samir. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pelikan Pavel. “Evolutionary Developmental Economics: How to Generalize Darwinism Fruitfully to Help Comprehend Economic Change.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 21, 2 (2011): 341–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelikan Pavel. “Agreeing on Generalized Darwinism: AResponse to Geoffrey Hodgson and Thorbjørn Knudsen.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 22, 1 (2012): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigliucci, Massimo and Gerd B. Müller, eds. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. “Campbell on the Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge.” In Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Gerard Radnitzky and W.W. Bartley, III, pp. 115–120. La Salle, IL: Open Court, [1974] 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Prusiner, Stanley B. “Prions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 95 (1998): 13383–13383.
   Google Scholar
• Prusiner, Stanley B. “A Unifying Role for Prions in Neurodegenerative Diseases.” Science 336 (2012): 1511–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramstad, Yngve. “On the Nature of Economic Evolution: John R. Commons and the Metaphor of Artificial Selection.” In Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approach to Economics, edited by Lars Mangusson, pp. 65–121. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Eric J. “Inherited Epigenetic Variation—Revisiting Soft Inheritance.” Nature Review Genetic 7 (2006): 395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Robert J. “The Natural Selection Model of Conceptual Evolution.” Philosophy of Science 44, 3 (1977): 494–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richerson, Peter J. and Robert Boyd. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie David. Darwinism and Politics. Second edition. London, UK: Swan Sonnenschein, 1891.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie David. “Social Evolution.” International Journal of Ethics 6, 2 (1896): 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman, Walter. The Theory of Cultural and Social Selection. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, Stephen K. The Evolution of Sociality: A Darwinian Conflict Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Si, Kausik, Yun-Beom Choi, Erica White-Grindley, Amitabha Majumdar and Eric R. Kandel. “Aplysia CPEB Can Form Prion-like Multimers in Sensory Neurons That Contribute to Long-Term Facilitation.” Cell 140 (2010): 421–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Bruce D. The Emergence of Aigriculture. New York, NY: Freeman, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Shiping. A General Theory of Institutional Change. London, UK: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Shiping. Social Evolution of International Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Shiping. “Eurasia Advantage, Not Genetic Diversity: Against Ashraf and Galor’s ‘Genetic Diversity’ Hypothesis.” Historical Social Research 41, 1 (2016): 287–327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Shiping. On Social Evolution: Phenomenon and Paradigm. Book manuscript in progress. Not dated (n.d.).
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Shiping, Zhan Hu and Yun Li. “Knowledge, Institution, Power, and Growth: Toward a Unified Economics of Growth.” SSRN, 2016. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2766052. Accessed December 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Shiping and Joey Shi Ruey Long. “American Military Interventionism: A Social Evolutionary Interpretation.” European Journal of International Relations 18, 3 (2012): 509–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen. Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Vanberg Viktor J. “Institutional Evolution through Purposeful Selection: The Constitutional Economics of John R. Commons.” Constitutional Political Economy 8, 1 (1997): 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. Theories of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. New York, NY: Random Houses, 1899.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, Jack. “Ontological Issues in Evolutionary Economics: The Debate Between Generalized Darwinism and the Continuity Hypothesis.” Paper on Economics and Evolution No. 0805. Jena Germany: Max Planck Institute of Economics, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, Jack. “Heterogeneous Economic Evolution: A Different View on Darwinizing Evolutionary Economics.” Paper on Economics and Evolution No. 1015. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Economics, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, Jack. “How to Make a Convincing Case for Darwinizing the Social Sciences? (Review of Hodgson and Knudsen, Darwin’s Conjecture).” Journal of Economic Methodology 19, 1 (2012): 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace , Alfred R. “The Origin of Human Races and the Antiquity of Man Deduced from the Theory of ‘Natural Selection’.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of London 2 (1864): clviii–clxxxvii.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, David A. “The Extended Phenotype(s): A Comparison with Niche Construction Theory.” Biology & Philosophy 30, 4 (2015): 547–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, John S. “The Appearance of Lamarckism in the Evolution of Culture.” In Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics, edited by John Laurent and John Nightingale, pp. 160–183. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, David Sloan and Elliott Sober. “Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 4 (1994): 585–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, Ulrich. “On the Proper Interpretation of ‘Evolution’ in Economics and Its Implications for Production Theory.” Journal of Economic Methodology 11, 2 (2004): 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, Ulrich. “What Is Specific About Evolutionary Economics?” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18, 6 (2008): 547–575.
   Google Scholar