The Institutionalist Theory of Capital in the Modern Business Enterprise: Appropriation and Financialization

References

• Ayres, Clarence. The Theory of Economic Progress. Kalamazoo, MI: New Issues Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Baranes, Avraham I. An Original Institutionalist Approach to the Structure, Conduct, and Performance of the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Importance of Intangible Assets. Ph.D. diss. University of Missouri – Kansas City, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Baranes, Avraham I. “Financialization in the American Pharmaceutical Industry: A Veblenian Approach.” Journal of Economic Issues 51, 2 (2017): 351-358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, Adlof and Gardiner Means. The Modern Corporation & Private Property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, [1910] 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Paul Dale. “An Exploration of the Structural Characteristics of a Veblen-Ayres-Foster Defined Institutional Domain.” Journal of Economic Issues 17, 1 (1983): 35-66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, Paul Dale. “The Theory of Institutional Change.” Journal of Economic Issues 21, 3 (1987): 1075-1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, Erik. Toward a Heterodox Theory of the Business Enterprise: The Going Concern Model and the US Computer Industry. Ph.D. diss. University of Missouri – Kansas City, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, Eugene and Michael C. Jensen. “Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics 26, 2 (1983): 301-325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, John F. “The Theory of Institutional Adjustment.” Journal of Economic Issues 15, 4 (1981a): 923-928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, John F. “Syllabus for Problems of Modern Society: The Theory of Institutional Adjustment.” Journal of Economic Issues 15, 4 (1981b): 929-935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, Eric R. “Capital and the Modern Corporation.” In Thorstein Veblen and the Revival of Free Market Capitalism, edited by Janet T. Knoedler, Robert E. Prasch and Dell P. Champlin, pp. 31-61. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hake, Eric R. and Martin B. King. “The Veblenian Credit Economy and the Corporatization of American Meatpacking.” Journal of Economic Issues 36, 2 (2002): 1-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, Eric R. and Dell Champlin. “Immigration as Industrial Strategy in American Meatpacking.” Review of Political Economy 18, 1 (2006): 49-70.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Walton H. “Property Rights in the Market.” Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1, 3-4 (1943): 10-33.
   Google Scholar
• Hilferding, Rudolf. Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London, UK: Routledge, [1910] 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Michael C. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review 76, 2 (1986): 323-329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Philip. “Power and Economic Performance: The Institutionalist View.” Journal of Economic Issues 21, 3 (1987): 1341-1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippner, Greta R. “The Financialization of the American Economy.” Socio-Economic Review 3, 2 (2005): 173-208.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, William. “The Quest for Shareholder Value: Stock Repurchases in the US Economy.” Louvain Economic Review 74, 4 (2008): 479-540.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, William and Mary O’Sullivan. “Maximizing Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance.” Economy and Society 29, 1 (2010): 13-35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, Ann. “How American Economists Came to Love the Sherman Antitrust Act.” History of Political Economy 30, Supplement (1998): 179-201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, Hyman. “Schumpeter: Finance and Evolution.” In Evolving Technology and Market Structure: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics, edited by Arnold Heertje and Mark Perlman, pp. 51-74. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Munkirs, John R. “The Dichotomy: Views of a Fifth Generation Institutionalist.” Journal of Economic Issues 22, 4 (1988): 1035-1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan, Jonathan. “Differential Accumulation: Towards a New Political Economy of Capital.” Review of International Political Economy 5, 2 (1998): 169-216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan, Jonathan. “Merger, Stagflation, and the Logic of Globalization.” Review of International Political Economy 8, 2 (2001): 226-274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan, Jonathan and Simon Bichler. Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, Thomas I. “Financialization: What It Is and Why It Matters.” Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 525, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ranson, Baldwin. “The Institutionalist Theory of Capital Formation.” Journal of Economic Issues 21, 3 (1987): 1265-1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serfati, Claude. “Financial Dimensions of Transnational Corporations, Global Value Chain, and Technological Innovation.” Journal of Innovation Economics 2, 2 (2008): 35-61.
   Google Scholar
• Tool, Marc. Value Theory and Economic Progress: The Institutional Economics of J. Fagg Foster. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1904.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. “On the Nature of Capital.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 22, 4 (1908a): 517-542
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. “On the Nature of Capital: Investment, Intangible Assets, and the Pecuniary Magnate.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 23, 1 (1908b): 104-136.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. “Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times.” New York, NY: A.M. Kelley, [1923] 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, William. “The Evolution of the Veblenian Dichotomy: Veblen, Hamilton, Ayres, and Foster.” Journal of Economic Issues 17, 3 (1982): 757-771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar