Interpreting Contemporary Latin America through the Hypotheses of Institutional Political Economy

References

• Abramovitz, Moses. 1986. “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind.” Journal of Economic History 46 (2): 385–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardao, A. 1963. “Assimilation and Transformation of Positivism in Latin America,” Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (4): 515–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroche Reyes, Fidel. 2013 “La estructura económica del (sub)desarrollo y el equilibrio general o ¿qué ocurrió con la teoría del desarrollo y con las estructuras económicas?” Revista de Economia Política 33, no. 3 (132): 538–550.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice. 2001. The Rise of the Rest. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice. 2004. “La Sustitución de Importaciones en las Industrias de alta Tecnología: Prebisch Renace en Asia,” Revista de la Cepal 82: 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice. 2010. “Elites and Property Rights,” UNU-WIDER, Working Paper No. 2010/109: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Amsden, Alice, Alisa DiCaprio and James Robinson (eds.). 2012. The Role of Elites in Economic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arés, M. 2007. “El Estado Empresario: Nacional Financiera Durante la Industrialización por Sustitución de Importaciones (1934–1994),” Foro Internacional, 47, no. 2: 201–244.
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, Rodrigo y Judith Sutz. 2001. “Desigualdad, Tecnología e Innovación en el Desarrollo Latinoamericano,” Iberoamericana 1 (1): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Arocena, Rodrigo y Judith Sutz. 2003. “Inequality and Innovation as Seen from the South,” Technology in Society 25 (2): 171–182. Bebbington, Anthony and Jeffrey Bury (eds.). 2013. Subterranean Struggles: New Dynamics of Mining, Oil, and Gas in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, Luis and José Ocampo. 2012. The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bücher, Karl. 1910. Die Entstehung der Volkswirtschaft, Tübengen: H. Laupp’sche Buchandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Paul D. 1994. “Social Change, Theory of,” Geoffrey Hodgson, Warren Samuels and Marc Tool (eds.), Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, V. II Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing. 291–296.
   Google Scholar
• Di Caprio, Alisa and Alice Amsden. 2004. Does the New International Trade Regime Leave Room for Industrialization Policies in the Middle-Income Countries? World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, International Labour Office (Policy Integration Department) Working Paper No. 22, Geneva, Switzerland: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Carmagnani, M. 1976. Formación y Crisis de un Sistema Feudal: América Latina del siglo XVI a Nuestros Días. México, D.F.: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Carmagnani, M. 1984. Estado y Sociedad en América Latina, 1850–1930. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., M. Cimoli, N. Correa and G. Dosi. 2009. “Technological Learning, Policy Regimes and Growth,” M. Cimoli, G. Dosi and J. Stiglitz (eds.), Industrial Policy and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 39–78.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon.. 2002. “Breaking the Mould – An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the Neo-Liberal Theory of the Market and the State,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (5): 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon. 2009. “Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark: How Development has Disappeared from Today’s “Development” Discourse,” (February 15, pre-publication version) Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 1–11: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=chang-hamletwithouttheprinceofdenmark.pdf&site=25.
   Google Scholar
• Coatsworth, John. 2005. “Structures, Endowments and Institutions in the Economic History of Latin America,” Latin American Research Review 40 (3): 126–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés Conde, R. 1992. “Export-led growth in Latin America: 1870–1930.” In Quincentenary Supplement, Journal of Latin American Studies 24 (1):163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 1989. “Debt Crisis as Opportunity,” Latin American Perspectives 16 (1): 52–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 1990a. “Latin American Structuralist Economics: An Evaluation, Critique and Reformulation.” In James Dietz and Dilmus James (eds.), Progress Toward Development in Latin America: From Prebisch to Technological Autonomy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner: 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 1990b. State and Capital in Mexico. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2005. “The Political Economy of the Chilean State in the Neoliberal Era: 1973–2005.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 26 (4): 763–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2010. “South America’s Commodities Boom: Developmental Opportunity or Path Dependent Reversion?” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 30 (3–4): 565–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2012. “Veblen y el Origen de la Hipótesis del Catching-Up.” Problema del Desarrollo 43, no. 169 (abril-junio): 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2014a. “Energy Privatized: The Ultimate Neoliberal Triumph” NACLA: Report on the Americas 47 (1): 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2014b. “Institutional-Structural Impediments to National Innovation Systems,” Journal of Institutional Studies 6 (3): 34–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2014c. “Brazil: Neoliberal Restructuring or the Rejuvenation of the Developmental State?” in Yildiz Atasoy (ed.), Global Economic Crisis and the Politics of Diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 181–211.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James. 2015. “América Latina Frente al Auge y Crisis de los Commodities,” in Rodolfo García Zamora (ed.), Megaminería, Extractivismo y Desarrollo en América Latina. México, D.F.: M.A. Porrúa: 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James and Aldo Pérez-Escatel. 2013. “Instituciones y Tecnología como Factores Clave en los Proyectos Nacional del Desarrollo: un Análisis Comparativo de Brasil y México” Revista Apuntes del CENES, 32 (56): 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Cypher, James and Yolanda Alfero 2016. “Triángulo del Neodesarrollismo en Ecuador,” Problemas del Desarrollo, 47 (185): 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, William. 1990. “The New Institutionalism: New But not Institutionalist,” Journal of Economic Issues 24 (2): 423–431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugger, William. 1995. “Douglas C. North’s New Institutionalism,” Journal of Economic Issues 24 (2): 453–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, Kent. 2014. “New Strategies of the Latin American Right,” Juan Pablo Luna and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (eds.), The Resilience of the Latin American Right. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, Tomaso. 2015. “Dr. Brasilia and Mr. Nacala: The Apparent Duality behind the Brazilian State-Capital Nexus,” Revista de Economia Política, 35 (2): 343–359.
   Google Scholar
• Ffrench-Davis, R., Ó. Muñoz y J. Palma. 1991. “Las Economías Latinoamericanas, 1950–1990,” T. Halperín Donghi, W. Glade, R. Thorp, A. Bauer, M. Moreno Fraginals, C. Lewis, V. Bulmer-Thomas, R. Ffrench-Davis, Ó. Muñoz y G. Palma. Historia Económica de América Latina. Barcelona, España: Editorial Crítica. 333–402.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1995. “The National Innovation Systems in Historical Perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1): 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glade, William. 1969. The Latin American Economies: A Study of their Institutional Evolution. New York, NY: D. Van Nostrand Company.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, John. 2014. “The Political Orientation of Thorstein Veblen,” European Journal of Economic and Social Systems 26 (1–2): 31–54
   Google Scholar
• Hira, Anil. 2007a. An East Asian Model for Latin American Success. Williston, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hira, Anil. 2007b. “Did ISI Fail and is Neoliberalism the Answer for Latin America? Re-Assessing Common Wisdom Regarding Economic Policies in the Region,” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 27, no. 3 (107): 345–356.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey, Warren Samuels and Marc Tool, (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, 1 and 2. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Innis, Harold. 1995. Staples, Markets and Cultural Change: Selected Essays, ed. by Daniel Drache Montreal: McGill-Queen’s, UP.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, Tae-Hee, and John Henry. 2015. “The Business Enterprise in the Age of Money Manager Capitalism,” Journal of Economic Issues, 49 (1): 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Chlamers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Chlamers. 1999. “The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept,” pp. 32–92 in Meredith Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, M. and S. Blankenburg. 2009. “The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Asia and Latin America,” M. Cimoli, G. Dosi and J. Stiglitz (eds.) Industrial Policy and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 336–377.
   Google Scholar
• Kasahara, Yuri and Antonio Botelho. 2015. “Brazilian “Developmental State” Reloaded? Brazilian Industrial Policy for the Oil and Gas Sector in the 21st Century,” Paper presented at the 2015 LASA Conference, May 27–30, San Juan, Puerto Rico: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. and Kosacoff, B. 2003. “El Aprendizaje Tecnológico, el Desarrollo Institucional y la Microeconomía de la Sustitución de Importaciones,” E. Cárdenas et al. (eds) Industrialización y Estado en la América Latina, México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica. 58–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Cristobál. 1989. “A Review of Zeitlin and Radcliff’s Landlords and Capitalists,” Work, Employment and Society 3 (3): 407–408.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Cristobál. 2002. “Why East Asia Overtook Latin America: Agrarian Reform, Industrialisation and Development,” Third World Quarterly 23 (6): 1073–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhi, Atul. 1999. “Where do High-Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea’s ‘Developmental State’,” Meredith Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 93–136.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, N. 1978. “Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: The Economic Groups,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 26 (4): 661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, A. 2006. Empresarios, Instituciones y Desarrollo Económico: el Caso Argentino. Buenos Aires: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Marín, Anabel, Lilia Stubrin y María Amelia Gibbons. 2014. “Construyendo capacidades tecnológicas en escenarios inestables: empresas manufactureras argentinas y brasileñas.” Revista de la CEPAL, 114: 163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Medialdea, B. 2012. “Límites Estructurales al Desarrollo Económico: Brasil (1950–2005).” Problemas del Desarrollo 43: 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip and Dieter Plehwe. 2009. The Road from Mount Pèlerin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mistree, Dinsha, 2013. “How Elites Determine Development.” Economic & Political Weekly, 48 (35): 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, Alfred. 2014. “Brazil: Explaining the Rise and Decline of Conservatives.” Juan Pablo Luna and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (eds.), The Resilience of the Latin American Right. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. 294–329.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Brid, J. y J. Ros. 2010. Desarrollo y Crecimiento en la Economía Mexicana. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, Gunnar. 1968. Asian Drama, vol. 2. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Naseemullah, A. and C. Arnold. 2015. “The Politics of Developmental State Persistence: Institutional Origins, Industrialization, and Provincial Challenge.” Studies in Comparative International Development 50 (1): 121–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Caldentey Esteban and Matías Vernengo. 2015. “Back to the Future Reloaded: Latin America’s Development Strategy during the Commodity Boom.” (unpublished manuscript, Bucknell University, Department of Economics).
   Google Scholar
• Perissinotto Renato, Paulo Costa, Wellington Nunes and Angela Ilha. 2014. “Elites Estatais e Industrialização: Ensaio de Comparação entre Brasil, Argentina e México (1920–1970).” Revista de Economia Política, 34 (3): 503–519.
   Google Scholar
• Plehwe, Dieter. 2009. “Introduction.” Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, The Road from Mount Pèlerin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, Eric. 2009. “Production Based Economic Theory and the Stages of Economic Development.” W. Dreschsler, Rainer Kattel and Eric Reinert, (eds.), Techno-Economic Paradigms. London: Anthem. 271–285.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani, 2013, “Unconditional Convergence in Manufacturing,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (1): 165–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, James. 2010. “Elites and Institutional Persistence.” UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 2010/85 (July): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ross Schneider, Ben. 1999. “The Desarrollista State in Brazil and Mexico.” Meredith Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 276–305.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, Jim (ed.). 2014. The Staples Theory at 50. Ottawa, CA: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, Howard. 2008. Beyond the World Bank Agenda: An Institutional Approach to Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, Maristella. 2013. “’Consenso de los Commodities’ y Lenguajes de Valoración en América Latina.” Nueva Sociedad 244 (marzo-abril): 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Teichman Judith. 1995. Privatization and Political Change in Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teichman Judith. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toye, John. 1991. “Is there a New Political Economy of Development?” C. Colclough and J. Manor (eds.), States or Markets? Neo-Liberalism and the Development Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 321–338.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, Robert. [1990] 1999. El Mercado Dirigido. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, John. 1998. “Latin American Reform: A View from Washington.” Harry Costin and Hector Vanolli, (eds.), Economic Reform in Latin America, Orlando: The Dryden Press. 106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. [1904] 1958. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. [1915] 1942. Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution. New York: The Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1923. Absentee Ownership. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Verdoorn, P.J. 1998. “Factors that Determine Growth in Labour Productivity.” Duncan Ironmonger, J.O.N. Perkins and Tran Van Hoa (eds.) National Income and Economic Progress. London: Macmillan. 199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Vilela Vieira, Flávio, Ana Paula Avellar and Michele Polline Veríssimo. 2014. “Indústria e Crescimento Econômico: Evidências para Países Desenvolvidos e em Desenvolvimento.” Revista de Economia Política 34 (3): 485–502.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, M. and R. Ratcliff. 1988. Landlords and Capitalists: The Dominant Class of Chile. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar