Development and the Revival of Political Economy

References

• Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson. 2005. “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Philippe Aghion, and Steven Durlauf, 385–472. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, Daron, James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral Filho, Jair, Deborah Farias 2016. “Celso Furtado: Culture and Creativity Matter.” Journal of Economic Issues 50(2): 444‐451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, Clarence. 1944. The Theory of Economic Progress, 1st ed. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, Clarence. 1952. The Industrial Economy: Its Technological Basis and Institutional Basis. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Boianovsky, Mauro, and Leonardo Monasterio. 2018. “O Encontro Entre Douglass North e Celso Furtado em 1961: Visões Alternativas Sobre a Economia Nordestina.” Revista Brasileira de Economia 72 (3): 275–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2010. Globalização e Competição: Por que alguns países emergentes têm sucesso e outros não. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cammack, Paul. 2004. “What the World Bank means by Poverty Reduction and Why it Matters.” New Political Economy 9 (2): 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammack, Paul. 2017 “The UNDP, the World Bank and Human Development Through the World Market.” Development Policy Review 35 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002. “Breaking the Mould: An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the Neoliberal Theory of the Market and the State.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (5): 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon. 2010. “Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark: How Development has Disappeared from Today's ‘Development’ Discourse.” In Towards New Developmentalism: Market as Means Rather than Master, edited by Shahrukh Rafi Kahn, and Jens Christiansen, 47–58. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon. 2011. “Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History.” Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (4): 473–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, John B. 1891. “Distribution as Determined by the Law of Rent.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 5 (3): 289–318.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald H. 1937 “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4 (16): 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald H. 1998 “The New Institutional Economics.” American Economic Review – Papers and Proceedings, 88 (2): 72–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Avi J. 2014. “Veblen Contra Clark and Fisher: Veblen-Robinson-Harcourt lineages in Capital Controversies and Beyond.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (6): 1493–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Avi, and Geoffrey C. Harcourt 2003. “Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, John Rogers. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, John Rogers. 1931. “Institutional Economics.” American Economic Review 21 (4): 648–657.
   Google Scholar
• Dobb, Maurice. 1969. Welfare Economics and the Economics of Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1959. A Formação Econômica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1974. O mito do desenvolvimento econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1976. Prefácio a nova economia política. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1977. “Programa para uma nova economia política.” Análise Social 13 (3): 743–751.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1978. Criatividade e dependência na civilização industrial. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1980. Pequena introdução ao desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia Editora Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1981 “Estado e empresas transacionais na industrialização periférica.” Revista de Economia Política 1 (1): 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 1984. Cultura e desenvolvimento em época de crise. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 2003 “O Brasil do século XX.” Interview to Eduardo Pereira Nunes, Estatísticas do Século XX, Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado, Celso. 2014. Obra autobiográfica de Celso Furtado. Entre inconformismo e reformismo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, Des. 2008. “Denis Goulet and the Project of Development Ethics: Choices in Methodology, Focus and Organization.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 9 (3): 453–474.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, Denis. 1971. “An Ethical Model for the Study of Human Values.” Harvard Educational Review 41 (2): 205–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulet, Denis. 1977. The Uncertain Promise: Value Conflicts in Technology Transfer. New York: IDOC.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, Denis. 1979. “Can Values Shape Third World Technology Policy?” Journal of International Affairs 33 (1): 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Walton H. 1919. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory,” American Economic Review 9, No. 1 (Supplement): 309–318.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, Geoffrey C. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Shahrukh R., and Jens Christiansen (eds.). 2010. Towards New Developmentalism: Market as Means Rather than Master. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalecki, Michal. 1971. Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, Nuno O. 2013. The Cambridge Revival of Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, Nuno O. 2020. “Human Development: Which Way Now?” New Political Economy 25 (3): 404–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Wesley C. 1913. Business Cycles, Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, Luigi L. 1993. Structural Economic Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, Luigi L. 2007. Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to be Accomplished, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary, and Vivian Walsh. (eds.) 2012. The End of Value-Free Economics. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, Lionel. (1932) 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan,
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, Lionel. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment.” Economic Journal 48 (192): 635–641.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Joan. (1970) 1980 “Thinking about Thinking.” Reprinted in Vol. 5: 110–119 in Collected Economic Papers of Joan Robinson, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Joan. 1985. “The Theory of Normal Prices and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory.” In Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution, edited by G. Feiwel, 157–165. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostow, Walt. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen Amartya K. 1960. Choice of Techniques. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. K. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2004, “How Does Culture Matter?” In Culture and Public Action, edited by V. Rao, and M. Walton, 37–58. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2005. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian Culture, History and Identity. New York: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya K. 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, João P. 2020. “Pragmatism as a Pillar of the New Developmentalistm.”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 40 (2): 376‐397.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, Robert. 1956, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1898. “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12 (4): 373–397.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1908. “Professor Clark's Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 22 (2): 147–195.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1914. The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1915. Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, William T. 1982. “The evolution of the Veblenian dichotomy: Veblen, Hamilton, Ayres and Foster” Journal of Economic Issues 16 (3): 757–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, Vivian. 2003. “Sen after Putnam.” Review of Political Economy 15 (3):315–94.
   Google Scholar