The effect of explicit embedded reflective instruction on nature of science understandings in advanced science students

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. 1998. “The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Doctoral diss., Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and V. L. Akerson. 2009. “The Influence of Metacognitive Training on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 31(16): 2161–2184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students' Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(10): 1057–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., M. Waters, and A. Le. 1998. “Representations of Nature of Science in High School Chemistry Textbooks Over the Past Four Decades.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(7): 835–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., C. A. Buzzelli, and L. A. Donnelly. 2008. “Early Childhood Teachers' Views of Nature of Science: The Influence of Intellectual Levels, Cultural Values, and Explicit Reflective Teaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(6): 748–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., J. A. Morrison, and A. Roth McDuffie. 2006. “One Course is Not Enough: Preservice Elementary Teachers' Retention of Improved Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43(2): 194–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., and M. L. Volrich. 2006. “Teaching Nature of Science Explicitly in a First-grade Internship Setting.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43(4): 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. 2011. “Evaluating Knowledge of the Nature of (Whole) Science.” Science Education 95(3): 518–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atıcı, T., and N. Bora. 2004. “Suggestions and Evaluation of Teaching Methods that are Used for Biology Education in Secondary Education.” Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences 6(2): 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., L. M. Blair, B. A. Crawford, and N. G. Lederman. 2003. “Just Do It? Impact of a Science Apprenticeship Program on High School Students’ Understandings of the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (5): 487–509.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., J. J. Matkins, and B. M. Gansneder. 2011. “Impacts of Contextual and Explicit Instruction on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Understandings of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48(4): 414–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, R., and M. Niaz. 1997. “Epistemological Beliefs of Students and Teachers About the Nature of Science: From ‘Baconian Inductive Ascent’ to the ‘Irrelevance’ of Scientific Laws.” Instructional Science 25(3): 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buaraphan, K. 2012. “Embedding Nature of Science in Teaching About Astronomy and Space.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21(3): 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartier, J. 2000. Using a Modeling Approach to Explore Scientific Epistemology with High School Students. Research report 99–1 for the National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/publications/reports/RR99–1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, S., and S. Bayrakceken. 2012. “The Influence of an Activity-based Explicit Approach on the Turkish Prospective Science Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37(4): 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chiapetta, E. L., and D. A. Fillman. 2007. “Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in the United States for Inclusion of the Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 29(15): 1847–1868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil, E., and S. Cepni. 2012. “The Effectiveness of the Conceptual Change Approach, Explicit Reflective Approach, and Course Book by the Ministry of Education on the Views of the Nature of Science and Conceptual Change in Light Unit.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12(2): 1107–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., and L. Manion. 1994. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Damastes, S., and H. J. Wandersee. 1992. “Biological literacy in a College Biology Classroom.” BioScience 42(1): 63–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2008. “Turkish Grade 10 Students' and Science Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A National Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(10): 1083–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., and N. E. Wallen. 2006. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Greavez-Fernandez, N. 2010. “Influence of Views About the Nature of Science in Decision-making About Socio-scientific and Pseudo-scientific Issues.” Doctoral diss., University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Irez, S. 2006. “Are We Prepared?: An Assessment of Preservice Science Teacher Educators’ Beliefs About Nature of Science.” Science Education 90(6): 1113–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irez, S. 2009. “Nature of Science as Depicted in Turkish Biology Textbooks.” Science Education 93(3): 422–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. R. 2000. “Historical Case Studies: Teaching the Nature of Science in Context.” Science Education 84(1): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. 2012. “Nature of Science and Decision-making.” International Journal of Science Education 34(1): 67–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “The Influence of Explicit and Reflective Versus Implicit Inquiry-oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(7): 551–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and N. Lederman. 2006. “Teaching Nature of Science Within a Controversial Topic: Integrated Versus Nonintegrated.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 4(4): 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and N. G. Lederman. 2007. “Relationship Between Instructional Context and Views of Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 29(8): 939–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. M., and K. S. Kitchener. 2004. “Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development of Epistemic Assumptions Through Adulthood.” Educational Psychologist 39(1): 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopfer, L., and W. Cooley. 1963. “Effectiveness of the History of Science Cases for High Schools in the Development of Student Understanding of Science and Scientists.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1: 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klymkowsky, M. W., K. Garvin-Doxas, and M. Zeilik. 2003. “Bioliteracy and Teaching Efficacy: What Biologists Can Learn From Physicists?” Cell Biology Education 2(3): 155–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koksal, M. S., and K. Sormunen. 2009. “Advanced Science Students’ Understanding on Nature of Science in Turkey.” A paper presented at European Science Education Research Association 2009 Conference, Istanbul, 31 August–3 September.
   Google Scholar
• Küçük, M. 1992. “Improving Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Views of the Nature of Science Using Explicit Reflective Teaching in a Science, Technology and Society Course.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 33(2): 16–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 1992. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(4): 331–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 1998. “The State of Science Education: Subject Matter Without Context.” Electronic Journal of Science Education 3 (2). http://www.files.chem.vt.edu/confchem/1998/lederman/lederman.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research in Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 831–879. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., and F. Abd-El-Khalick.1998. “Avoiding De-natured Science: Activities That Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science”. In W. F. McComas (Eds.). The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and strategies, edited by W. F. McComas, 83–126. Dodrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., R. S. Schwartz, F. Abd-El-Khalick, and R. L. Bell. 2001. “Pre-service Teachers' Understanding and Teaching of the Nature of Science: An Intervention Study.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education 1(2): 135–160.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H., and C. Chen. 2002. “Promoting Preservice Chemistry Teachers' Understanding About the Nature of Science Through History.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(9): 773–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., and N. Lederman. 2002. “Taiwanese Gifted Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” School Science and Mathematics 102(3): 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. 1998. “The Principle Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies, edited by W. F. McComas, 53–70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. 2003. “A Textbook Case of the Nature of Science: Laws and Theories in the Science of Biology.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1(2): 141–155.
   Google Scholar
• Meichtry, Y. 1992. “Influencing Students Understanding of the Nature of Science: Data From a Case of Curriculum Development.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(4): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. 2011. “To Improve Science Literacy, Researchers Should Run for School Board.” Nature Medicine 17(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, V. S. I., M. O. Martin, G. J. Ruddock, C. Y. O’Sullivan, A. Arora, and E. Erberber. 2005. TIMSS 2007 Assessment Frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/PISA. 2003. PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/PISA. 2009. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. K., M. P. Clough, C. N. Bruxvoort, and D. W. Vanderlinden. 2005. “Improving Students’ Nature of Science Understanding Through Historical Short Stories in an Introductory Geology Course.” Paper presented at Eighth International History, Philosophy, Sociology & Science Teaching Conference, University of Leeds, 15–18 July.
   Google Scholar
• Özaslan, H., N. Yıldız, and Y. Çetin. 2009. Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Yetenekleri Dışındaki Mesleklere Yönelme Nedenleri ve Sakıncaları. [Reasons for Tendency of Gifted Students’ Choice of Occupations That are not related to Their Ability and Its Potential Problems]. Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar II. Ulusal Kongresi [Second National Congress on Gifted Students]. Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey, 25–27 March.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, B., and F. Finley. 1997. “Preservice Teachers’ Views of the Nature of Science During a Postbaccalaureate Science Teaching Program.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(6): 595–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmquist, B., and F. Finley. 1998. “A Response to Bell, Lederman, and Abd-El-Khalick’s Explicit Comments.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(9): 1063–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., and J. S. Oliver. 2009. “The Transition of Teachers’ Understanding of Gifted Students Into Instructional Strategies for Teaching Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20(4): 333–351.
   Google Scholar
• Project 2061. 2007. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. 2005. “Scientific Awareness and Scientific Literacy.” Teaching Science 51(1): 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. G., and G. S. Aikenhead. 1992. “Students’ Preconceptions About the Epistemology of Science.” Science Education 76(6): 559–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W., and K. Morrison. 2003. “High School Students’ Ideas About Theories and Theory Change After a Biological Inquiry Unit.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(4): 369–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., N. Lederman, R. Khishfe, J. Lederman, L. Matthews, and S. Liu. 2002. “Explicit/Reflective Instructional Attention to Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: Impact on Student Learning.” Paper presented at the annual international conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS), Charlotte, NC, 10–13 January.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., N. G. Lederman, and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2012. “A Series of Misrepresentations: A Response to Allchin’s Approach to Assessing Nature of Science Understandings.” Science Education 964(4): 685–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. 2006a. “Reinterpreting and Reconstructing Science: Teachers’ View Changes Towards the Nature of Science by Courses of Science Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22: 363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. 2006b. “Biological Knowledge is More Tentative Than Physics Knowledge: Taiwan High School .Adolescents' Views About the Nature of Biology and Physics.” Adolescence (San Diego): An International Quarterly Devoted to the Physiological, Psychological, Psychiatric, Sociological, and Educational Aspects of the Second Decade of Human Life 41 (164): 691–703.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ninth Grade Biology Curriculum. 2007. Turkish Ministry of Education. Turkey: Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Education. 2007. “2007 OKS istatistikleri. [2007 OKS statistics].” http://oks2007.meb.gov.tr/oks_ista.htm#2.
   Google Scholar
• Uno, G. E., and R. W. Bybee. 1994. “Understanding the Dimensions of Biological Literacy.” BioScience 44(8): 553–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, W., and H. Walberg. 1972. “A National Experiment in Curriculum Evaluation.” American Educational Research Journal 9: 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar