Plant visibility through mobile learning? Implementation and evaluation of an interactive Flower Hunt in a botanic garden

References

• Baird, J. Hugh, Reuven Lazarowitz, and Verl Allman. 1984. “Science Choices and Preferences of Middle and Secondary School Students in Utah.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21 (1): 47–54. doi:10.1002/tea.3660210106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balas, Benjamin, and Jennifer L. Momsen. 2014. “Attention ‘blinks’ Differently for Plants and Animals.” CBE Life Sciences Education 13 (3): 437–443. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-05-0080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balding, Mung, and Kathryn J. H. Williams. 2016. “Plant Blindness and the Implications for Plant Conservation.” Conservation Biology 30 (6): 1192–1199. doi:10.1111/cobi.12738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, Anne. 2005. “The Ability of A-level Students to Name Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (2): 63–67. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, Franz X. 1998. “The Influence of Short-term Outdoor Ecology Education on Long-term Variables of Environmental Perspective.” The Journal of Environmental Education 29 (4): 17–29. doi:10.1080/00958969809599124.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, Franz X., and Manfred G. Wilhelm. 1996. “Environmental Perspectives of Pupils: The Development of an Attitude and Behaviour Scale.” Environmentalist 16 (2): 95–110. doi:10.1007/BF01325101.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, Franz X., and Michael Wiseman. 2004. “Outdoor Ecology Education and Pupils’ Environmental Perception in Preservation and Utilization.” Sience Education International 15 (1): 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bozniak Eugene, C. 1994. “Challenges Facing Plant Biology Teaching Programs.” Plant Science Bulletin 40 (2): 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome S. 1960. “On Learning Mathematics.” The Mathematics Teacher 53 (8): 610–619.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Susan. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Charter, R. A. 2003. “Study Samples Are Too Small to Produce Sufficiently Precise Reliability Coefficients.” The Journal of General Psychology 130 (2): 117–129.10.1080/00221300309601280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cires, Eduardo, Yannick de Smet, Candela Cuesta, Paul Goetghebeur, Suzanne Sharrock, Douglas Gibbs, Sara Oldfield, Andrea Kramer, and Marie-Stéphanie Samain. 2013. “Gap Analyses to Support Ex Situ Conservation of Genetic Diversity in Magnolia, a Flagship Group.” Biodiversity and Conservation 22 (3): 567–590. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0450-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary, Renee, and James H. Wandersee. 2011. “Our Human-plant Connection.” Science Scope 34 (8): 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, Helen. 2013. “A Historical Overview of Mobile Learning: Toward Learner-centered Education.” Chap. 1. In Handbook of Mobile Learning, edited by Yu (Aimee) Zhang, 3–14. Florence: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, Helen, Diane Burke, Kristen H. Gregory, and Catharina Gräbe. 2016. “The Use of Mobile Learning in Science. A Systematic Review.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9597-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, Lee J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, Justin, Mark Rickinson, Kelly Teamey, Marian Morris, Mee Young Choi, Dawn Sanders, and Pauline Benefield. 2006. “The Value of Outdoor Learning: Evidence from Research in the UK and Elsewhere.” School Science Review 87 (320): 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, Katherine M. 1997. “Perceptions of the Environment While Exploring the Outdoors: A Case Study in Belize.” Environmental Education Research 3 (3): 327–344.10.1080/1350462970030306
   Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, Jana, and Pavol Prokop. 2010. “Development and Initial Psychometric Assessment of the Plant Attitude Questionnaire.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (5): 415–421. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9207-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, Jana, and Pavol Prokop. 2011. “Plants Have a Chance. Outdoor Educational Programmes Alter Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Plants.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 537–551. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.545874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feierabend, Sabine, Theresa Plankenhorn, and Thomas Rathgeb. 2015: JIM 2015 – Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12-19-Jähriger in Deutschland [Youth, Information, Multimedia. A Baseline Study About Media Handling of Young People Aged 12 to 19 in Germany]. Stuttgart: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (Mpfs).
   Google Scholar
• Freund, Philipp Alexander, Jörg-Tobias Kuhn, and Heinz Holling. 2011. “Measuring Current Achievement Motivation with the QCM. Short Form Development and Investigation of Measurement Invariance.” Personality and Individual Differences 51 (5): 629–634. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Eva-Maria, and Daniel C. Dreesmann. 2014. “Nutzpflanzen und Landwirtschaft in Schulbüchern.” [Crop Plants and Agriculture in Schoolbooks.] Journal für Didaktik der Biowissenschaften F 5: 58–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Eva-Maria, Cornelia Lechner-Walz, and Daniel C. Dreesmann. 2015. “Hands-on Crops! How Long-term Activities Improve Students’ Knowledge of Crop Species. A Pretest-Posttest Study of the Greenhouse Project.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10 (5): 737–755.
   Google Scholar
• Gatt, Suzanne, Sue Dale Tunnicliffe, Kurtsten Borg, and Katya Lautier. 2007. “Young Maltese Children’s Ideas About Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 41 (3): 117–122. doi:10.1080/00219266.2007.9656080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Brian C. 2014. “Reconfiguring Bruner. Compressing the Spiral Curriculum.” Phi Delta Kappan 95 (7): 41–44. doi:10.1177/003172171409500710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton-Ekeke, Joy-Telu. 2007. “Relative Effectiveness of Expository and Field Trip Methods of Teaching on Students’ Achievement in Ecology.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (15): 1869–1889. doi:10.1080/09500690601101664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, R. M. 1999. “What is a Spiral Curriculum?” Medical Teacher 21 (2): 141–143. doi:10.1080/01421599979752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, Andreas. 1993. “Die Entwicklung der Lernfreude vom Kindergarten bis zur 5. Klassenstufe.” [The Development of Learning Enjoyment from Kindergarten Until Fifth Grade]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 7 (2/3): 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hershey, David R. 2002. “Plant Blindness: ‘We have met the enemy and he is us’.” Plant Science Bulletin 48 (3): 78–84.
   Google Scholar
• International Agenda for Botanic Gardens in Conservation. 2012. Richmond: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Peter S. Wyse. 1999. “Experimentation on a Large Scale – An Analysis of the Holdings and Resources of Botanic Gardens.” Botanic Gardens Conservation International, UK. BGCNews 3 (3). https://www.bgci.org/resources/article/0080/.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, Sanna. 2001. “Shifting Research on Motivation and Cognition to an Integrated Approach on Learning and Motivation in Context.” In Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications, edited by Simone Volet and Sanna Järvelä, 3–14. London: Pergamon/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Ann, Kim Issroff, Eileen Scanlon, Gill Clough, and Patrick Mcandrew. 2006. “Using Mobile Devices for Learning in Informal Settings: Is It Motivating?” Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning Dublin. Barcelona, Spain: IADIS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Florian G., and Urs Fuhrer. 2003. “Ecological Behavior’s Dependency on Different Forms of Knowledge.” Applied Psychology 52 (4): 598–613. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchin, Ian M. 1999. “Educational Research – Investigating Secondary-school Girls’ Preferences for Animals or Plants: A Simple ‘head-to-head’ Comparison Using Two Unfamiliar Organisms.” Journal of Biological Education 33 (2): 95–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMK (Kultusministerkonferenz) Bonn – Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. 2015. “The Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany 2013/2014: A Description of the Responsibilities, Structures and Developments in Education Policy for the Exchange of Information in Europe.” https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Eurydice/Bildungswesen-engl-pdfs/dossier_en_ebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlleppel, Tammy, Jennifer Campbell Bradley, and Steve Jacob. 2002. “A Walk Through the Garden: Can a Visit to a Botanic Garden Reduce Stress?” Horttechnology 12 (3): 489–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuzer, Pia, and Daniel Dreesmann. 2016. “Museum Behind the Scenes – An Inquiry-based Learning Unit with Biological Collections in the Classroom.” Journal of Biological Education 51 (3): 261–272. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1217906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, Petra. 2005. “‘Loveable’ Mammals and ‘lifeless’ Plants. How Children’s Interest in Common Local Organisms Can be Enhanced Through Observation of Nature.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 655–677. doi:10.1080/09500690500038116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzanal, R. Fernández, L. M. Rodríguez Barreiro, and M. Casal Jiménez. 1999. “Relationship between Ecology Fieldwork and Student Attitudes Toward Environmental Protection.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (4): 431–453.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Richard E. 2009. Multimedia Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811678
   Google Scholar
• Meishar-Tal, Hagit, and Michal Gross. 2014. “Teaching Sustainability via Smartphone-enhanced Experiential Learning in a Botanical Garden.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM) 8 (1): 10–15. doi:10.3991/ijim.v8i1.3441.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Guy. 2012. “Mobile Practices in Everyday Life. Popular Digital Technologies and Schooling Revisited.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 770–782. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01352.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, Steve. 2014. “Science Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century.” The Science Teacher 81 (6): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelstaedt, Robin, Laura Sanker, and Beth VanderVeer. 1999. “Impact of a Week-long Experiential Education Program on Environmental Attitude and Awareness.” Journal of Experiential Education 22 (3): 138–148.10.1177/105382599902200306
   Google Scholar
• Naeimi, Maki, and Thomas Chow Voon Foo. 2014. “A Comparison of Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Iranian EFL University Students. Repeating versus Cooperating with Peers.” ELT 7 (7): 102–110. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n7p102.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, Eva, and Dawn Sanders. 2014. “Drawing Attention to the ‘green side of life’.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (3): 142–153. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.849282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, Sara. 2010. “Plant Conservation, Botanic Gardens and the International Agenda.” Proceedings of the 4th Global Botanic Gardens Congress. https://www.bgci.org/files/Dublin2010/papers/Oldfield-Sara.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, Bryan, Inmaculada Arnedillo Sánchez, and Brendan Tangney. 2006. “Designing Collaborative, Constructionist and Contextual Applications for Handheld Devices.” Computers and Education 46 (3): 294–308. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pergams, Oliver R. W., and Patricia A. Zaradic. 2006. “Is Love of Nature in the US Becoming Love of Electronic Media? 16-Year Downtrend in National Park Visits Explained by Watching Movies, Playing Video Games, Internet Use, and Oil Prices.” Journal of Environmental Management 80 (4): 387–393. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitman, Nigel C. A., and Peter M. Jorgensen. 2002. “Estimating the Size of the World’s Threatened Flora.” Science 298 (5595): 989. doi:10.1126/science.298.5595.989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, Pavol, Gaye Tuncer, and Júlia Chudá. 2007. “Slovakian Students’ Attitudes Toward Biology.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 3 (4): 287–295.
   Google Scholar
• Prokop, Pavol, Gaye Tuncer, and Radoslav Kvasničák. 2007. “Short-term Effects of Field Programme on Students’ Knowledge and Attitude Toward Biology: A Slovak Experience.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (3): 247–255. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, Falko, Regina Vollmeyer, and Bruce D. Burns. 2001. “FAM. Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktuller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen.” [A Questionnaire on Current Motivation in Specific Performance Situations]. Diagnostica 47 (2): 57–66. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickinson, Mark, Justin Dillon, Kelly Teamey, Marian Morris, Mee Young Choi, Dawn Sanders, and Pauline Benefield. 2004. A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. Shrewsbury: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Schussler, Elisabeth E., and Lynn A. Olzak. 2008. “It’s Not Easy Being Green: Student Recall of Plant and Animal Images.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (3): 112–119. doi:10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellmann, Daniela, and Franz X. Bogner. 2012. “Climate Change Education. Quantitatively Assessing the Impact of a Botanic Garden as an Informal Learning Environment.” Environmental Education Research 19 (4): 415–429. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.700696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, Mike, Dan Corlett, and Oliver Westmancott. 2002. “The Design and Implementation of a Mobile Learning Resource.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6 (3): 220–234. doi:10.1007/s007790200021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrigley, Robert L. 1990. “Attitude and Behavior are Correlates.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (2): 97–113. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, Marc J., Robert B. Powell, and Nicole M. Ardoin. 2008. “What Difference Does It Make? Assessing Outcomes From Participation in a Residential Environmental Education Program.” The Journal of Environmental Education 39 (4): 31–43. doi:10.3200/JOEE.39.4.31-43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strgar, Jelka. 2007. “Increasing the Interest of Students in Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (1): 19–23. doi:10.1080/00219266.2007.9656102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, John. 2005. “Defining Mobile Learning.” In Proceedings IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning, 261–266, Malta.
   Google Scholar
• Uno, Gordon E., and Rodger W. Bybee. 1994. “Understanding the Dimensions of Biological Literacy.” BioScience 44 (8): 553–557. doi:10.2307/1312283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, James H. 1986. “Plants or Animals: Which Do Junior High School Students Prefer to Study?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23 (5): 415–426.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, James H., and Elisabeth E. Schussler. 1998. “A Model of Plant Blindness.” Poster and paper presented at the 3rd Annual Associates Meeting of the 15° Laboratory, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Wandersee, James H., and Elisabeth E. Schussler. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Plant Blindness.” Plant Science Bulletin 47 (1): 219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Žoldošová, Kristina, and Pavol Prokop. 2006. “Education in the Field Influences Children’s Ideas and Interest toward Science.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 (3–4): 304–313. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9017-3.
   Google Scholar
• Zurita, Gustavo, and Miguel Nussbaum. 2004. “Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Using Wirelessly Interconnected Handheld Computers.” Computers and Education 42 (3): 289–314. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar