Are plants living beings? Biases in the interpretation of landscape features by pre-service teachers

References

• Alanazi, F. H. 2018. “Saudi Children’s Taxonomic Knowledge of Animal Species.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 17 (3): 395–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. 2013. “A Brief History of Landscape Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, edited by P. Howard, I. Thompson, and E. Waterton, 12–22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aramburu, F. 2000. Medio Ambiente Y Educación. Madrid: Summary.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, M. R. 2008. “Sensory Perception, Rationalism and Outdoor Environmental Education.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 17 (1): 6–12. doi:10.2167/irgee225.0.
   Google Scholar
• Babai, R., R. Sekal, and R. Stavy. 2010. “Persistence of the Intuitive Conception of Living Things in Adolescence.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (1): 20–26. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9174-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajo Bajo, M. J. 2001. “El paisaje en el currículum de Educación Primaria, dentro del Área del Conocimiento del Medio Natural, Social y Cultural.” Aula 13: 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Balding, M., and K. J. Williams. 2016. “Plant Blindness and the Implications for Plant Conservation.” Conservation Biology 30 (6): 1192–1199. doi:10.1111/cobi.12738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman, C. R., N. S. Barman, M. L. Cox, K. B. Newhouse, and M. J. Goldston. 2000. “Students’ Ideas about Animals: Results from a National Study.” Science and Children 38 (1): 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, O. 2001. “Landscape Ecology – Towards a Unified Discipline?” Landscape Ecology 16: 757–766. doi:10.1023/A:1014412915534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. F. 1981. “When Is an Animal, Not an Animal?” Journal of Biological Education 15 (3): 213–218. doi:10.1080/00219266.1981.9654381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkowitz, D., and K. Kohler. 2010. “Perception of Biodiversity—The Impact of School Gardening.” In Urban Biodiversity and Design, edited by N. Müller, P. Werner, and J. G. Kelcey, 425–440. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bierema, A. M. K., and R. S. Schwartz. 2015. “Undergraduate Biology Students’ Interpretations of the Term ‘animal’.” Anthrozoös 28 (3): 371–383. doi:10.1080/08927936.2015.1052269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonet Pla, M. T., R. Pena Vila, and J. Ribas Vilàs. 2004. “El paisaje como recurso educativo en el marco de la educación para la participación.” Didáctica geográfica, 2ª Época 6: 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, C. 2013. “Landscapes as Contexts for Learning.” In International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education, edited by R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, and A. Wals, 275–283. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., and C. Ku. 1998. “Aboriginal Children’s Alternative Conceptions of Animals and Animal Classification.” Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 8 (2): 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Corraliza, J. A., S. Collado, and L. Bethelmy. 2012. “Nature as a Moderator of Stress in Urban Children.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 38: 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.347.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. 1985. “Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10 (1): 45–62. doi:10.2307/622249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention. Florence, Italy: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado Huertos, E. 2015. “El paisaje en la formación de maestros, un recurso educativo de alto interés para la educación primaria.” TABANQUE Revista Pedagógica 28: 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., and L. Tornabene. 2012. “Preservice Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions of Outdoor Settings as Learning Environments.” Environmental Education Research 18 (5): 643–664. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.640749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2011. “Plants Have a Chance: Outdoor Educational Programmes Alter Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Plants.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 537–551. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.545874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, M. 2007. “La evolución de las ideas de los niños sobre los seres vivos.” PhD Diss., Universidade da Coruña.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Ortiz, A. 1993. “Reflexiones acerca del contenido ‘paisaje’ en los ‘currícula’ de la Enseñanza Obligatoria.” Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado 16: 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Ortiz, A. 2001. “El paisaje como tema transversal en el diseño curricular base (D.C.B.) de la educación obligatoria. La montaña como objeto de estudio.” Biblio 3W. Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales 267.
   Google Scholar
• González Bernáldez, F. 1981. Ecología y paisaje. Madrid: Blume.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. L., Jr, K. H. Redford, and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2014. “The Complementary Niches of Anthropocentric and Biocentric Conservationists.” Conservation Biology 28 (3): 641–645. doi:10.1111/cobi.12296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. 2006. Árboles bosques de vida. Fichero de actividades. Seville.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, M. 2000. El paisaje y su sombre. Viareggio, Italy: IdeaBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Liceras Ruiz, A. 2003. Observar e interpretar el paisaje. Estrategias didácticas. Granada: Grupo Editorial Universitario.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2002. “The Influence Of an Educational Program on Children's Perception Of Biodiversity.” The Journal Of Environmental Education 33 (2): 22-31. doi:10.1080/00958960209600805.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann‐Matthies, P. 2005. ‘Loveable’mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: how children's interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature.International journal of science education 27 (6): 655-677
   Google Scholar
• Marín Martínez, N. 2005. La enseñanza de las ciencias en educación infantile. Granada: Grupo editorial universitario.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, R., and R. García. 2013. “La enseñanza del paisaje en la Educación Infantil en España.” Paper presented at the III encontro CITCEM, Paisagem- (I) Materialidade, Centro de Investigaçao Transdisciplinar, Facultade de Letras, Universidade de Porto, Porto, Portugal, November 21-24.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Losada, C., S. García-Barros, and M. Garrido. 2014. “How Children Characterise Living Beings and the Activities in Which They Engage.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (4): 201–210. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.849281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mérida Serrano, R., J. Torres-Porras, and J. Alcántara Manzanares. 2017. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales en Educación Infantil. Madrid: Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Rybråten, S., M. Skår, and H. Nordh. 2017. “The Phenomenon of Walking: Diverse and Dynamic.” Landscape Research 1–13. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1400527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, M. A. 1999. Didáctica multisensorial de las ciencias: Un nuevo método para alumnos ciegos, deficientes visuales, y también sin problemas de visión. Vol. 40. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., and N. Wax. 1989. “Children’s Conceptions of Plants as Living Things.” Human Development 32 (2): 88–94. doi:10.1159/000276367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanwick, C. 2002. Landscape Character Assessment – Guidance for England and Scotland. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tema, B. O. 1989. “Rural and Urban African Pupils’ Alternative Conceptions of ‘animal.’.” Journal of Biological Education 23 (3): 199–207. doi:10.1080/00219266.1989.9655068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønnessen, M. 2018. “The Search Image as Link between Sensation, Perception and Action.” Biosystems 164: 138–146. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Porras, J., J. Alcántara, J. C. Arrebola, S. J. Rubio, and M. Mora. 2017. “Trabajando El Acercamiento a La Naturaleza De Los Niños Y Niñas En El Grado De Educación Infantil.” Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación De Las Ciencias 14 (1): 258–270. doi: 10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2017.v14.i1.19.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, C. 2014. An Approach to Landscape Character Assessment. London: Natural England.
   Google Scholar
• Vega Navarro, A. 2007. “Ideas, conocimientos y teorías de niños y adultos sobre las relaciones Sol-Tierra-Luna. Estado actual de las investigaciones.” Revista de Educación 342: 475–500.
   Google Scholar
• Villarroel, J. D. 2013. “Environmental Judgment in Early Childhood and Its Relationship with the Understanding of the Concept of Living Beings.” SpringerPlus 2 (1): 87. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villarroel, J. D., and G. Infante. 2014. “Early Understanding of the Concept of Living Things: An Examination of Young Children’s Drawings of Plant Life.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (3): 119–126. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.837406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldau, P. 2013. Animal Studies: An Introduction. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 1999. “Preventing Plant Blindness.” The American Biology Teacher 61: 84–86. doi:10.2307/4450624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Plant Blindness.” Plant Science Bulletin 47: 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaza, S., R. Olgana, and E., . Ö. Yılmaztekinc. 2016. “Nature Connectedness and Landscape Preferences of Turkish Preservice Preschool Teachers.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (15): 8120–8142.
   Google Scholar
• Yorek, N., M. Sahin, and H. Aydin. 2009. “Are Animals ‘more Alive’than Plants? Animistic-anthropocentric Construction of Life Concept.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 5 (4): 369–378. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75287.
   Google Scholar
• Zoido, F. 2012. “El paisaje un concepto útil para relacionar estética, ética y política.” Scripta Nova: Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales 16: 1–38.
   Google Scholar