How prepared do students feel for the quantitative nature of a biological sciences degree?

References

• ACS & Schools, I. 2017. “Thriving at University: University Admissions Officer Report 2017.” [online]. Accessed August 28. https://www.acs-schools.com/sites/default/files/ 2019-02/ACS_ThrivingAtUniversity_Report_2017_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aikens, M. L., and E. L. Dolan. 2014. “Teaching Quantitative Biology: Goals, Assessments, and Resources.” Molecular Biology of the Cell 25 (22): 3478–3481. doi:10.1091/mbc.e14-06-1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. E., and M. L. Aikens. 2018. “Life Science Majors’ Math-Biology Task Values Relate to Student Characteristics and Predict the Likelihood of Taking Quantitative Biology Courses.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 19 (2). doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AQA. 2019a. “A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHY(7037) Specification.” https://filestore.aqa.org.uk/resources/geography/specifications/AQA-7037-SP-2016.PDF
   Google Scholar
• AQA. 2019b. “AS AND A-LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY AS (7181) A-LEVEL (7182).” https://filestore.aqa.org.uk/resources/psychology/specifications/AQA-7181-7182-SP-2015.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Barone, L., J. Williams, and D. Micklos. 2017. “Unmet Needs for Analyzing Biological Big Data: A Survey of 704 NSF Principal Investigators.” PLoS Computational Biology 13 (10). doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shlomo, Y., U. Fallon, J. Sterne, and S. Brookes. 2004. “Do Medical Students with A-level Mathematics Have a Better Understanding of the Principles behind Evidence-based Medicine?” Medical Teacher 26 (8): 731–733. doi:10.1080/01421590400016290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby, N. 1985. Curricular Discontinuity: A Study of the Transition in Mathematics from Sixth Form to University. University of Sussex Education Area.
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S.-J., and T. W. Robbins. 2012. “Decision-making in the Adolescent Brain.” Nature Neuroscience 15 (9): 1184. doi:10.1038/nn.3177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feser, J., H. Vasaly, and J. Herrera. 2013. “On the Edge of Mathematics and Biology Integration: Improving Quantitative Skills in Undergraduate Biology Education.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 12 (2): 124–128. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-03-0057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, F., I. C. Mammarella, A. Devine, S. Caviola, M. C. Passolunghi, and D. Szűcs. 2016. “Maths Anxiety in Primary and Secondary School Students: Gender Differences, Developmental Changes and Anxiety Specificity.” Learning and Individual Differences 48: 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell, E. R., E. Shawcross, and E. Keeling. 2019. “How Does a Vocational Qualification (BTEC) Prepare Students for a Degree in Biosciences at a Research Intensive University?” New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, no. 14. doi:10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3315.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Council for Qualifications. 2018. “TABLES – GCSE, Project and Entry Level Trends - UK, 2018.” [online]. Accessed 7 June 2020. https://www.jcq.org.uk/Download/examination-results/gcses/2018/other-results-information/gcse-project-and-entry-level-trends-summer-2018
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. 2011. “Are Our Students Prepared for University?” Bioscience Education 18 (1): 1–12. doi:10.3108/beej.18.3SE.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J., S. Park, A. Venkat, and A. Gopinath. 2015. “Quantitative Analysis of the Trends Exhibited by the Three Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences: Biophysics, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 16 (2): 198. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, P. E., B. Wong, and M. G. Berry. 2016. The Roehampton Annual Computing Education Report. London: University of Roehampton.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, J. B., A. H. Reid, and K. R. Yamamoto. 2010. “Integrated Biology and Undergraduate Science Education: A New Biology Education for the Twenty-first Century?” CBE—Life Sciences Education 9 (1): 10–16. doi:10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, W. 2015. Count Us In: Quantitative Skills for a New Generation.The British Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., P. Adams, and M. Goos. 2015. “The Influence of Undergraduate Science Curriculum Reform on Students’ Perceptions of Their Quantitative Skills.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (16): 2619–2636. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1096427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Y. Hodgson, and C. Varsavsky. 2013. “Factors Influencing Students’ Perceptions of Their Quantitative Skills.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 44 (6): 782–795. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.814814.
   Google Scholar
• Mogilner, A. 2016. “Quantitative Biology on the Rise.” Molecular Biology of the Cell 27 (22): 3377–3378. doi:10.1091/mbc.e16-09-0673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century. BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington, DC: National Academy, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, L., D. Putwain, L. Connors, and P. Hornby-Atkinson. 2013. “The Key to Successful Achievement as an Undergraduate Student: Confidence and Realistic Expectations?” Studies in Higher Education 38 (2): 285–298. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.585710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. OECD Skills Outlook 2015: Youth, Skills and Employability. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peduzzi, P., J. Concato, E. Kemper, T. R. Holford, and A. R. Feinstein. 1996. “A Simulation Study of the Number of Events per Variable in Logistic Regression Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49 (12): 1373–1379. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner, P., and R. Shamir. 2009. “Computing Has Changed Biology—biology Education Must Catch Up.” Science 325 (5940): 541–542. doi:10.1126/science.1173876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D., P. Sander, and D. Larkin. 2013. “Academic Self‐efficacy in Study‐related Skills and Behaviours: Relations with Learning‐related Emotions and Academic Success.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (4): 633–650. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2014. Vision for Science and Mathematics Education. London, England: Royal Society Science Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Shone, J. 1988. “Working at the Biology/mathematics Interface: Mathematical Modelling and Sixth Form Biology.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 19 (4): 501–509. doi:10.1080/0020739880190402.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq, V. N. 2002. “A Decline in Numeracy Skills among Bioscienceunder Graduates.” Journal of Biological Education 36 (2): 76–83. doi:10.1080/00219266.2002.9655805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq, V. N. 2008. “Defining the Problem: Mathematical Errors and Misconceptions Exhibited by First-year Bioscience Undergraduates.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 39 (7): 889–904. doi:10.1080/00207390802136511.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq, V. N., and N. Durrani. 2012. “Factors Influencing Undergraduates’ Self-evaluation of Numerical Competence.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 43 (3): 337–356. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.618552.
   Google Scholar
• Thwaites, B. 1972. The School Mathematics Project: The First Ten Years. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth, L. P., C. R. Runyon, J. M. Drake, and E. L. Dolan. 2017. “Do Biology Students Really Hate Math? Empirical Insights into Undergraduate Life Science Majors’ Emotions about Mathematics.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 16 (3): ar49. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers, P. 1994. “First Year University Science-revisited.” Research in Science Education 24 (1): 382–383. doi:10.1007/BF02356373.
   Google Scholar