From concept to reality: the use and impact of 3D prints as academic tools for high school biology education

References

• Atif, Y., R. Benlamri, and J. Berri. 2003. “Learning Objects Based Framework for Self-Adaptive Learning.” Education and Information Technologies 8 (4): 345–368. doi:10.1023/B:EAIT.0000008676.64018.af.
   Google Scholar
• BrainPOP. 2017. Immune System. Retrieved from https://www.brainpop.com/health/bodysystems/immunesystem/
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, E., N. Comrie, M. Hofmann, S. McDonald, and A. Hurst. 2016. “Investigating the Implications of 3D Printing in Special Education.” ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8 (3): 1–28. doi:10.1145/2870640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, H. J. (2011). Object-based Learning in Higher Education: The Pedagogical Power of Museums. doi:10.18452/8697
   Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. H., and J. Reeve. 2015. “A Classroom-based Intervention to Help Teachers Decrease Students’ Amotivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 40: 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E. L., and D. A. Fittman. 1998. “Clarifying the Place of Essential Topics and Unifying Principles in High School Biology.” School Science and Mathematics 98 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17287.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-H., and P.-Y. Chu. 2018. “The Different Learning Outcomes of High School and College Students on a 3D-Printing STEAM Engineering Design Curriculum.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (6): 1047–1064. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., G. Knezek, S. den Lepcha, D. Dong, S. Liu, K. Wang, … H.-A. Yotchoum Nzia 2018. “Outcomes from Technology Enhanced Informal Learning Activities to Increase Middle School Students’ Interest in STEM.” Paper presented at the EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2018, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184353
   Google Scholar
• Çimer, A. 2012. What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students’ Views. Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 7, Trabzon, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, G. L., D. A. Donovan, and T. G. Chambers. 2016. “Increasing the Use of Student-Centered Pedagogies from Moderate to High Improves Student Learning and Attitudes about Biology.” CBE Life Sciences Education 15 (1): ar3–ar3. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-03-0062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, J., M. Pique, E. Getzoff, J. Huntoon, A. Gardner, and A. Olson. 2017. “A Self-Assisting Protein Folding Model for Teaching Structural Molecular Biology.” Structure 25 (4): 671–678. doi:10.1016/j.str.2017.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, S. C. F., and R. Simoes (2016. “Collaborative Use of Different Learning Styles through 3D Printing.” Paper presented at the 2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE). Vila Real, Portugal. 20–21 October
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo, P., I. M. Santos, L. Menano, and J. Thormann 2019. “Using 3D Printing for Curriculum Enhancement.” Paper presented at the EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2019, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/209987
   Google Scholar
• Ford, S., and T. Minshall. 2019. “Invited Review Article: Where and How 3D Printing Is Used in Teaching and Education.” Additive Manufacturing 25: 131–150. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francke, E., and B. Alexander. 2018. Educating the Millennial Learner: A Case of Collaborative Learning with Augmented Reality, 99–107,XV. Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited. Reading, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell, D. S., S. Dutta, C. Zardecki, M. Voigt, H. M. Berman, and S. K. Burley. 2015. “The RCSB PDB “Molecule of the Month”: Inspiring a Molecular View of Biology.” PLoS Biology 13 (5): e1002140. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A. D., S. N. Olof, M. J. Burke, J. P. K. Armstrong, E. A. Mikhailova, J. G. Nicholson, … H. Bayley. 2017. “High-Resolution Patterned Cellular Constructs by Droplet-Based 3D Printing.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 7004. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06358-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaysman, O., and D. Tubin. 2019. “Content Teaching: Innovative and Traditional Practices.” Educational Studies 45 (3): 342–356. doi:10.1080/03055698.2018.1446334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, P. W., B. R. Tabachnick, K. M. Zeichner, and J. Lemberger. 1999. “Educating Prospective Teachers of Biology: Findings, Limitations, and Recommendations.” Science Education 83 (3): 373–384. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199905)83:3<373::aid-sce6>3.0.CO;2-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D. M., S. D. Wiederman, and D. A. Saint. 2012. “Assessment Outcome Is Weakly Correlated with Lecture Attendance: Influence of Learning Style and Use of Alternative Materials.” Advances in Physiology Education 36 (2): 108–115. doi:10.1152/advan.00111.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. S., J. C. Chen, C. Y. Lin, P. W. Zhuo, and K. Y. Lin. 2019. “Using 3D Printing Technology with Experiential Learning Strategies to Improve Preengineering Students’ Comprehension of Abstract Scientific Concepts and Hands‐on Ability.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35 (2): 178–187. doi:10.1111/jcal.12319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakus, A. E. 2019. “Chapter 1 - an Introduction to 3D Printing—Past, Present, and Future Promise.” In 3D Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery, edited by M. Dipaola and F. M. Wodajo, 1–15, Elsevier. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., P. Katyal, X. Xie, M. P. Nicolas, E. M. Leung, D. M. Noland, and J. K. Montclare. 2019. “A ‘KAHOOT!’ Approach: The Effectiveness of Game-Based Learning for an Advanced Placement Biology Class.” Simulation & Gaming 1046878119882048. doi:10.1177/1046878119882048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keaveney, S., C. Keogh, L. Gutierrez-Heredia, and E. G. Reynaud (2016, 17–21 Oct. 2016). Applications for Advanced 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Printing Techniques for the Biological Sciences. Paper presented at the 2016 22nd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, G. 2010. “3D Printing Brings Designs to Life.” Tech Directions 70 (2): 17.
   Google Scholar
• Legault, L., I. Green-Demers, and L. Pelletier. 2006. “Why Do High School Students Lack Motivation in the Classroom? toward an Understanding of Academic Amotivation and the Role of Social Support.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (3): 567–582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H. A., Z. Y. Loo, S. J. Goldie, J. W. Adams, and P. G. McMenamin. 2016. “Use of 3D Printed Models in Medical Education: A Randomized Control Trial Comparing 3D Prints versus Cadaveric Materials for Learning External Cardiac Anatomy.” Anatomical Sciences Education 9 (3): 213–221. doi:10.1002/ase.1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loy, J. 2014. “eLearning and eMaking: 3D Printing Blurring the Digital and the Physical.” Education Sciences 4 (1): 108–121. doi:10.3390/educsci4010108.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, N., J. J. Cater Iii, and O. Varela. 2009. “Active versus Passive Teaching Styles: An Empirical Study of Student Learning Outcomes.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 20 (4): 397–418. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingming, L. 2019. Analysis of Modern Teaching Concept. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019). Moscow, Russia. April.
   Google Scholar
• Nancekivell, S. E., P. Shah, and S. A. Gelman. 2019. “Maybe They’re Born with It, or Maybe It’s Experience: Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Learning Style Myth.” Journal of Educational Psychology. No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. doi:10.1037/edu0000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, T. D., A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. T. Q. Nguyen, and D. Hui. 2018. “Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges.” Composites Part B: Engineering 143: 172–196. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quincy, B., and D. B. Jamika. 2014. MOTIVATE: Bringing Out the Fun with 3-D Printing and E-Textiles for Middle- and High-School Girls. American Society for Engineering Education Publications. Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/22848.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. M. 1987. “The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students.” TESOL Quarterly 21 (1): 87–111. doi:10.2307/3586356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rias, A.-L., C. Bouchard, F. Segonds, B. Vayre, and S. Abed. 2017. “Design for Additive Manufacturing: Supporting Intrinsic-Motivated Creativity.” In Emotional Engineering, edited by S. Fukuda, 99–116. Vol. 5. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, E. Q., and A. Wigfield. 2016. “STEM Motivation Interventions for Adolescents: A Promising Start, but Further to Go.” Educational Psychologist 51 (2): 146–163. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1154792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saga, Z., K. Qamar, and G. Trali. 2015. “Learning Styles-understanding for Learning Strategies.” Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 65 (5): 706–709. Retrieved from http://proxy.library.nyu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=110611800&site=eds-live
   Google Scholar
• Schelly, C., G. Anzalone, B. Wijnen, and J. M. Pearce. 2015. “Open-source 3-D Printing Technologies for Education: Bringing Additive Manufacturing to the Classroom.” Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 28: 226–237. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, L. 2018. “Object-based Learning, or Learning from Objects in the Anthropology Museum.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 40 (4): 282–304. doi:10.1080/10714413.2018.1532748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2016. “Active Learning in the Lecture Theatre Using 3D Printed Objects [Version 2; Peer Review: 2 Approved].” F1000Research 5 (61). doi:10.12688/f1000research.7632.2.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, R. F. 1999. “The Relationship between Learning Styles/Multiple Intelligences and Academic Achievement of High School Students.” The High School Journal 83 (2): 11–20. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40364506
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. S., E. G. Oliver, K. S. Cravens, and S. Oishi. 2017. “Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences.” Business Horizons 60 (1): 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratasys. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.stratasys.com
   Google Scholar
• Thingiverse. 2013-2017). “Infectious Pathogens; Antibody Modeling Kit.” 2019, 170.
   Google Scholar
• Tillinghast, R. C., M. T. Wright, R. D. Arnold, J. L. Zunino, T. L. Pannullo, S. Dabiri, … M. C. Gonzalez 2014. “Integrating Three Dimensional Visualization and Additive Manufacturing into K-12 Classrooms.” Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. 8–8 March. Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Trembach, S., and L. Deng. 2018. “Understanding Millennial Learning in Academic Libraries: Learning Styles, Emerging Technologies, and the Efficacy of Information Literacy Instruction.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 25 (3): 297–315. doi:10.1080/10691316.2018.1484835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. A. 2014. “Using a Kinesthetic Learning Strategy to Engage Nursing Student Thinking, Enhance Retention, and Improve Critical Thinking.” The Journal of Nursing Education 53 (6): 348–351. doi:10.3928/01484834-20140512-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, J., S. Wendt, and J. Beach (2015). 3D Printing: Tangible Applications in the K-12 Environment. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015, Las Vegas, NV, United States. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149980
   Google Scholar
• William, E., B. Erin, S. Gabrielle, and H. Amy. 2017. “Fabricating Engagement: Benefits and Challenges of Using 3D Printing to Engage Underrepresented Students in STEM Learning.” Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28347
   Google Scholar