Conceptual alignment between the somatic cell division curriculum, textbooks, instruction, and assessment in high school

References

• Anderson, L. W. 2002. “Curricular Alignment: A Re- Examination.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 255–260. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K., A. Porter, and J. Smithson. 2001. New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics and Science. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. 2002. “Cultural Reproductive of Social Class: Effects of Cultural Capital on Student Ability Test.” Korean Journal of Sociology 36 (4): 223–251.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H. H., J. B. Kahle, and F. G. Nordland. 1985. “An Investigation of High School Biology Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Some Suggestions for Teaching Genetics.” Science Education 69 (5): 707–719. doi:10.1002/sce.3730690512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M., and G. Barnett. 1999. “A Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association.” Human Communication Research 25 (4): 589–603. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00463.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M., and S. Connaughton. 2009. “Semantic Networks and Competition: Election Year Winners and Losers in U.S. Televised Presidential Debates, 1960–2004.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (1): 201–218. doi:10.1002/asi.20950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerton, S. 1985. “The Renaissance Development of the Scientific Illustration.” In Science and the Arts in the Renaissance, edited by J. Shirley and D. Horniger, 168–197. Washington, DC, USA: Folger Shakespeare Library.
   Google Scholar
• English, F. W. 1992. Deciding What to Teach and Test. California: Sage publication.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, F. N., J. Stewart, and W. L. Yarroch. 1982. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Important and Difficult Science Content.” Science Education 66 (4): 531–538. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660404.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., A. Porter, J. Smithson, and P. White. 1997. “Upgrading High School Mathematics Instruction: Improving Learning Opportunities for Low-achieving, Low-income Youth.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19 (4): 325–338. doi:10.3102/01623737019004325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L., N. M. Webb, and S. A. Zuniga. 2007. “Measurement Issues in the Alignment of Standards and Assessment.” Applied Measurement in Education 20 (1): 101–126. doi:10.1080/08957340709336732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H., and G. A. Barnett. 1994. “Cultural Differences in Organizational Communication: A Semantic Network Analysis 1.” Bulletin of Sociological Methodology 44 (1): 31–59. doi:10.1177/075910639404400104.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., S. Lim, Y. Kim, and K. Seo. 2015. “Analysis of Curriculum Alignment of ‘Cell and Continuity of Life’ Unit in Life Science l.„ Biology Education 43 (4): 445–454
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., D. Lee, and J. Lee. 2006. “Analysis of Conceptual Level and Organization on the Unit Related with Continuity of the Life in Middle School Science Textbook.” The Korean Journal of Biology Education 34 (3): 342–354.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., S. Lee, H. Kim, S. Lee, K. Kang, and S. Kim. 2002. “The Effect of a Teaching with Chromosome Model on the Understanding of Genetics.” Biology Education 30 (3): 282–288.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and H. Kang. 2009. “Analysis of Middle School Mathematics Textbooks and Evaluation Based on Curriculum Alignment.” The Journal of Curriculum Studies 27 (1): 111–139. doi:10.15708/kscs.27.1.200903.006.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and H. Kwon. 2016. “An Comparative Study of Articulation on Science Textbook Concepts and Extracted Concepts in Learning Objectives Using Semantic Network Analysis - Focus on Life Science Domain -.” Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 35 (3): 377–387. doi:10.15267/keses.2016.35.3.377.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., I. Park, and S. Lim. 2018. “Network Structure between Concepts of Units in the 2009 Revised Life Science Curriculum and Science Textbooks.” Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 18 (18): 29–49. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.18.29.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., S. Kim, W. Jeong, and K. Lee. 2001. “The Effect of Teaching - Learning Module of Heredity Based on Inquiry according to High School Students’ Cognitive Characteristics and Scientific Creativity.” The Korean Journal of Biology Education 29 (3): 220–229.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Y. Lee, and S. Lim. 2019. “A Concept Networks Analysis of the National Curriculum, Textbook, Teacher’s Instruction, and Assessment on Cell Division Unit of the High School Life Science I.” Biology Education 47 (3): 393–402.
   Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. C., A. J. Waarlo, and K. T. Boersma. 2005. “Design Criteria for Learning and Teaching Genetics.” Journal of Biological Education 39 (3): 108–112. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, A., N. Stephen, H. Joseph, and L. John. 2010. “Alignment of the Intended, Planned, and Enacted Curriculum in General and Special Education and Its Relation to Student Achievement.” The Journal of Special Education 44 (3): 131–145. doi:10.1177/0022466909341196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. 2007. “A Study on “Hakbeolism” and Class Conflict in Korea Society: Toward A Theorization of “Hakbeol” Capital.” Korean Journal of Sociology of Education 17 (4): 63–85. doi:10.32465/ksocio.2007.17.4.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2014. “A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Using the Language Network Analysis Methods.” Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 31 (4): 49–68. doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W., H. Kim, Y. Song, and S. Cho. 2016. Development of Diagnostic Items of Integrated Level for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessments (Records) at the School Field. Suwon: Gyeonggi Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., J. Leach, and C. Wood-Robinson. 2000. “Chromosome: The Missing Link–young People’s Understanding of Mitosis, Meiosis and Fertilization.” Journal of Biological Education 34 (4): 189–198. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. 2019. “An Analysis of Error Types of Solving the Cell Division Problem Based on Semantic Network Analysis.” Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 19 (11): 249–272. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.11.249.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S., B. Jang, J. Jeong, J. Lee, and Y. Kim. 2011. “An Analysis of Alignment between Instructional Objectives, Student’s Acquired Knowledge and Evaluation Items in ‘Stimulus and Reaction’ Unit in Science Class of Middle Schools.” The Korean Journal of Biology Education 39 (1): 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S., H. Hong, T. Lee, D. Kwon, and Y. Kim. 2014. “Analysis of Curriculum Alignment Index and Curriculum Contents Map of 8th Grade on ‘Digestion and Circulation’ Unit.” The Korean Journal of Biology Education 42 (1): 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S., and Y. Kim. 2015. “An Analysis of Articulation in Life Science Revision 2009 Curriculum with Semantic Network Analysis.” Biology Education 43 (1): 84–96. doi:10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.1.84.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and G. Fulmer. 2008. “Alignment between the Science Curriculum and Assessment in Selected NY State Regent Exams.” Journal of Science Educational and Technology 17 (4): 373–383. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9107-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Q., and E. Liu. 2012. “Alignment between High School Biology Curriculum Standard and the Standardised Tests of Four Provinces in China.” Journal of Biological Education 46 (3): 149–164. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.645855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. 1997. This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Min, H., and Y. Jeong. 1992. “A Survey on Middle School Student’s and Biology Teacher’s Cognition of Riological Concepts in the Unit of Continuity in the Life.” The Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 17 (1): 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. 2009. High School Science Curriculum Instruction Book. Chungbuk: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Paik, S., and J. Song. 2002. “Analysis of Differences of Explanation on Gas Pressure and Atmospheric Pressure in Science Textbooks.” Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 22 (2): 240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., and H. Cho. 1986. “Identification of Misconception of Genetic Concepts Held by High School Students and Suggestions for Teaching Genetics.” Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 6 (2): 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., S. Park, W. Lee, J. Kang, and Y. Lee. 2015. Curriculum, Instruction, Evaluation, Operation and Integration. Suwon: Gyeonggi Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., and J. L. Smithson. 2000. “Are Content Standards Being Implemented in the Classroom? A Methodology and Some Tentative Answers.” In From the Capital to the Classroom: Standards Based Reform in the States. One Hundredth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, edited by S. Fuhrman, 60–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C. 2002. “Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice.” Educational Researcher 31 (7): 3–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007003.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C. (2003, October). “Prospects for School Reform and Closing the Achievement Gap.” Paper presented at the Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference, New York City, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., and J. L. Smithson (2002). “Alignment of Assessment, Standards, and Instruction Using Curriculum Indicator Data.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., M. S. Polikoff, and J. Smithson. 2009. “Is There a De Facto National Intended Curriculum? Evidence from State Content Standards.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31 (3): 238–268. doi:10.3102/0162373709336465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., W. Seo, I. Um, S. Hong, K. Lee, and S. Noh. 2014. A Plan for Establishing Linkage of Curriculum, Class, and Evaluation Innovation. Suwon: Gyeonggi Institute of Education
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, S. A., A. Johnston, and S. Sowell. 2006. “Describing Teachers’ Conceptual Ecologies for the Nature of Science.” Science Education 90 (5): 874–906. doi:10.1002/sce.20153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, R. R. 1982. “Difficulties in Genetics Problem Solving.” The American Biology Teacher 44 (9): 525–527. doi:10.2307/4447599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, L. F. 1993. “Investigating Test Content and Curriculum Content Overlap to Assess Opportunity to Learn.” Journal of Negro Education 62 (3): 288–310. doi:10.2307/2295466.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, J., and J. Park. 2019. “Curriculum Framework Exploration for Implementation of Curriculum Alignment.” Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology 9 (7): 225–235.
   Google Scholar