The effect of CKCM-oriented instruction on Grade 8 students’ conceptual understanding of sustainable development

References

• Abdurrahman, A., C. A. Setyaningsih, and T. Jalmo. 2019. “Implementating Multiple Representation-Based Worksheet to Develop Critical Thinking Skills.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 16 (1): 138–155. doi:10.12973/tused.10271a.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, M. R., E. Grzybowski-Bross, J. W. Renner, and E. A. Marek. 1992. “Understandings and Misunderstandings of Eighth Graders of Five Chemistry Concepts Found in Textbooks.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (2): 105–120. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afacan, Ö., and M. P. Demirci-Güler. 2011. “Sürdürülebilir Çevre Eğitimi Kapsamında Tutum Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması” [Developing Attitude Scale in the Context of Sustainable Environmental Education]. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya, April 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Akgün, A., Ü. Duruk, and H. Gülmez-Güngörmez. 2016. “Altıncı Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modeline Ilişkin Görüşleri” [Sixth Grade Students’ Views on Common Knowledge Construction Model]. Amasya Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi 5 (1): 184–202. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.3465.
   Google Scholar
• Aksan, Z., and D. Çelikler. 2019. “Recycling Awareness Education: Its Impact on Knowledge Levels of Science Teacher Candidates.” International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education 9 (2): 81–105.
   Google Scholar
• Atmaca, A. C., S. A. Kiray, and M. Pehlivan. 2019. “Development of a Measurement Tool for Sustainable Development Awareness.” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 6 (1): 80–91. doi:10.21449/ijate.518099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar, M., A. H. Johnstone, and R. G. Sutcliffe. 1999. “Investigation of Students’ Cognitive Structure in Elementary Genetics through Word Association Tests.” Journal of Biological Education 33 (3): 134–141. doi:10.1080/00219266.1999.9655653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajar-Sales, P. A., R. A. Avilla., and V. M. I. Camacho. 2015. “Predict-Explain-Observe-Explain (PEOE) Approach: Tool in Relating Metacognition to Achievement in Chemistry.” The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education 19 (7): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bakırcı, H. , Çalık, M. , Çepni, S. . 2017 The Effect of the Common Knowledge Construction Model-Oriented Education on Sixth Grade Students’ Views on the Nature of Science . Journal of Baltic Science Education 16 1 43–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakırcı, H., and Ö. Ensari. 2018. “The Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model on Academic Achievement and Conceptual Understandings of High School Students on Heat and Temperature.” Education and Science 43 (196): 171–188. doi:10.15390/EB.2018.7457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakırcı, H., and S. Çepni. 2012. “Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretimi Için Yeni Bir Model: Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modeli” [A New Model for Science and Technology Education: Common Knowledge Construction Model]. Paper presented at the X. National Congress on Science and Mathematics Education, Niğde, June 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bakırcı, H., S. Çepni, and H. Ş. Ayvacı. 2014. “Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin Öğretim Ortamında Uygulanabilirliği Konusunda Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri” [Science Teachers’ Opinions about Common Knowledge Construction Model]. Yüzüncü Yil University Journal of Education Faculty 12 (1): 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Bakırcı, H., S. Çepni, and M. Yıldız. 2015. “Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin Altıncı Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi: Işık Ve Ses Ünitesi” [The Effects of Common Knowledge Construction Model on the Sixth Grade Students’ Academic Achievement: Light and Sound Unit]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi 26: 182–204.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, B., F. Tochinai, and H. Kanemitsu. 2020. “Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Sustainable Development among Malaysian Undergraduates.” International Journal of Higher Education 9 (1): 44–51. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p44.
   Google Scholar
• Bayar, M. F. 2019. “The Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model on Science Process Skills and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students on Solar System and Eclipse.” Online Science Education Journal 4 (1): 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Benli-Özdemir, E. 2014. “Fen Öğretiminde Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin Ilköğretim Öğrencilerinin Bilişsel Ve Duyuşsal Öğrenmeleri Üzerine Etkilerinin Incelenmesi” [The Study on Impact of Common Knowledge Construction Model on the Cognitive and Affective Learning of Primary Education Students in Science Education]. PhD diss., Gazi University.
   Google Scholar
• Biernacka, B. 2006. “Developing Scientific Literacy of Grade Five Students: A Teacher-Researcher Collaborative Effort.” Phd diss., University of Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Bolstad, R., C. Eames, and M. Robertson. 2006. The State of Environmental Education in New Zealand: A Baseline Assessment of Provision in the Formal Sector in 2006. Wellington, New Zealand: WWF-New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M. 2013. “Sustainable Development, Environmental Education, and the Significance of Being in Place.” The Curriculum Journal 24 (2): 250–271. doi:10.1080/09585176.2013.792672.
   Google Scholar
• Çalik, M. . 2013 Effect of Technology-Embedded Scientific Inquiry on Senior Science Student Teachers’ Self-Efficacy . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 9 3 223–232 doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.931a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . 2009. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 7 4 651–676 doi:10.1007/s10763-008-9136-9 . Çalik, M. , Ayas, A. , Coll, R.K. Investigating the Effectiveness of an Analogy Activity in Improving Students’ Conceptual Change for Solution Chemistry Concepts
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalik, M. , Ayas, A. , Coll, R.K. . 2010 Investigating the Effectiveness of Teaching Methods Based on a Four-Step Constructivist Strategy . Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 1 32–48 doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9176-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalik, M. , Cobern, W.W. . 2017 A Cross-Cultural Study of CKCM Efficacy in an Undergraduate Chemistry Classroom . Chemistry Education Research and Practice 18 691–709 doi:10.1039/C7RP00016B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, M. , Bayçelebi, Z. . 2020 Developing and Implementing Prediction-Observation-Explanation Worksheets of Healthy Foods . Elementary Education Online 19 3 18–39 doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2020.735188
   Google Scholar
• Çalık, M. , Eames, C. . 2012 The Significance of National Context: A Comparison of Environmental Education in Turkey and New Zealand . Asia Pacific Education Researcher 21 3 423–433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, M. , Wiyarsi, A. . 2021 A Systematic Review of the Research Papers on Chemistry-Focused Socio-Scientific Issues . Journal of Baltic Science Education 20 3 360–372 doi:10.33225/jbse/21.20.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caymaz, B., and A. Aydin. 2021. “The Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model-Based Instruction on 7th Grade Students’ Academic Achievement and Their Views about the Nature of Science in the Electrical Energy Unit at Schools of Different Socio-Economic Levels.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 19 (2): 233–265. doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10054-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chichilnisky, G. 1997. “What Is Sustainable Development?” Land Economics 73 (4): 467. doi:10.2307/3147240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, H., and S. Vural. 2016. “Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin (OBYM), Sekizinci Sinif Düzeyindeki Üstun Yetenekli Ogrencilerin Kimya Dersine Yönelik Tutumlari Üzerine Etkisi” [The Effect of the Common Knowledge Construction Model on the 8th Grade Gifted Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry Course]. Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education Journal 13 (1): 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 2007. “Environmental Citizenship: Towards Sustainable Development.” Sustainable Development 15 (5): 276–285. doi:10.1002/sd.344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duruk, U., A. Akgün, and H. Gülmez-Güngörmez. 2021. “Exploring the Impact of Common Knowledge Construction Model on Students’ Understandings of Heat Transfer: Exploring the Impact of Common Knowledge.” International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 13 (1): 114–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J. V., and S. Connor. 1998. Learning to Teach Science: A Model for the 21 Century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J. V., and S. M. Haggerty. 1999. Becoming Secondary School Science Teachers: Preservice Teachers as Researchers. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Simon and Schuster/A Viacom Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., S. Chacko, and N. Immanuel. 2004. “Common Knowledge Construction Model for Teaching and Learning Science: Application in the Indian Context.” http://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-1/themes/jazlin_Ebnezer_finalpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., S. Chacko, O. N. Kaya, S. K. Koya, and D. L. Ebenezer. 2010. “The Effects of Common Knowledge Construction Model Sequence of Lessons on Science Achievement and Relational Conceptual Change.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 25–46. doi:10.1002/tea.20295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilks, I. 2015. “Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development–Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 11 (1): 149–158. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., and K. L. Kirchgasler. 2015. “Sustainability in Science Education? How the Next Generation Science Standards Approach Sustainability, and Why It Matters.” Science Education 99 (1): 121–144. doi:10.1002/sce.21137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, L. 2012. “Teacher and Student Responses to Interdisciplinary Aspects of Sustainability Education: What Do We Really Know?” Environmental Education Research 18 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.574209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyberg, P., and H. Löfgren. 2016. “Knowledge outside the Box – Sustainable Development Education in Swedish Schools.” Educational Research 58 (3): 283–299. doi:10.1080/00131881.2016.1207871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G., Z. Aksan., and D. Çelikler. 2015. “Mental Models Which Influence the Attitudes of Science Students Towards Recycling.” International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy 4 (1–2): 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Huckle, J., and A. E. J. Wals. 2015. “The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Business as Usual in the End.” Environmental Education Research 21 (3): 491–505. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1011084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İyibil, Ü. 2011. “A New Approach for Teaching ‘Energy’ Concept: The Common Knowledge Construction Model.” Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences 2 , no. Special Issue: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kadji-Beltran, C., A. Zachariou, and R. B. Stevenson. 2013. “Leading Sustainable Schools: Exploring the Role of Primary School Principals.” Environmental Education Research 19 (3): 303–323. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.692770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahriman-Öztürk, D., R. Olgan, and T. Güler. 2012. “Preschool Children’s Ideas on Sustainable Development: How Preschool Children Perceive Three Pillars of Sustainability with the Regard to 7R.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12 4 , no. : 2987–2995.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, M. F. 2013. “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması” [A Scale Development Study on the Attitudes of Sustainable Development]. Marmara Cografya Dergisi 28: 175–193.
   Google Scholar
• Keleş, Ö., and M. Aydoğdu. 2010. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ekolojik Ayak Izlerini Azaltma Yolları Konusundaki Görüşleri” [Science Teacher Candidates’ Views on Reducing Ecological Footprints]. Journal of Turkish Science Education 7 (3): 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Kiryak, Z. , Çalik, M. . 2018 Improving Grade 7 Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Water Pollution via Common Knowledge Construction Model . International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 6 1025–1046 doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9820-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2012. “Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): The Turn Away from ‘Environment’ in Environmental Education?” Environmental Education Research 18 (5): 699–717. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.658028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. 2018. “Teaching Sustainable Development Goals in the Netherlands: A Critical Approach.” Environmental Education Research 24 (9): 1268–1283. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1303819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, A., and T. Guler-Yildiz. 2017. “Assessing Preschools Using the Eco-Schools Program in Terms of Educating for Sustainable Development in Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 25 (4): 595–611. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2017.1331074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, E. 2014. “Education for Sustainability at a Primary School: From Silos to Systems Thinking.” Environmental Education Research 20 (3): 432–433. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.833593.
   Google Scholar
• Littledyke, M. 2008. “Science Education for Environmental Awareness: Approaches to Integrating Cognitive and Affective Domains.” Environmental Education Research 14 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/13504620701843301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybeck, L., F. Marton, H. Stromdahl, and A. Tullberg. 1988. “The Phenomenography of the ‘Mole Concept’ in Chemistry P. Ramsden .” In Chap. 5 In Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page 81–108 .
   Google Scholar
• Manteaw, B. 2020. “Education and Learning in Sustainable Development: Foregrounding an Emergent Discourse.” Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education 11 (2): 5–19. doi:10.2478/dcse-2020-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography-Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10: 177–200. doi:10.1007/BF00132516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, M. J. 2012. “Implementing Education for Sustainable Development in Schools: Learning from Teachers’ Reflections.” Environmental Education Research 18 (6): 765–782. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.665850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education. 2018. Turkish Science Curricula for Grades 3-8. Ankara: Head Council of Education and Morality.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, K., and T. Tal. 2013. “Education for Sustainability in Higher Education: A Multiple-Case Study of Three Courses.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (3): 140–149. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.821353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, V., T. Vukic, T. Maletaski, and M. Andevski. 2020. “Students’ Attitudes Towards Sustainable Development in Serbia.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 21 (4): 733–755. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, D., N. Gericke, and S. N. Chang-Rundgren. 2016. “The Effect of Implementation of Education for Sustainable Development in Swedish Compulsory Schools – Assessing Pupils’ Sustainability Consciousness.” Environmental Education Research 22 (2): 176–202. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1005057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwu, G. O. M., and W. C. Kyle Jr. 2011. “Increasing the Socio-Cultural Relevance of Science Education for Sustainable Development.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15 (3): 5–26. doi:10.1080/10288457.2011.10740715.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, O. 2007. “A New Environmental Education Perspective: Education for Sustainable Development.” Education and Science 32 (145): 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özden, B., and N. Yenice. 2020. “The Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model-Based Teaching on the Cognitive and Psychomotor Learning of 7th Grade Students.” Journal of Science Learning 4 (1): 31–40. doi:10.17509/jsl.v4i1.25607.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., and B. P. Hungler. 1999. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods (6th Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ransom, M., and M. Manning. 2013. “Teaching Strategies: Worksheets, Worksheets, Worksheets.” Childhood Education 89 (3): 188–190. doi:10.1080/00094056.2013.792707.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, F. 2002. “The Potential of Education for Sustainable Development for Reform in Schools.” Environmental Education Research 8 (1): 43–51. doi:10.1080/13504620120109646.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2009. “Socioscientific Issues in Science Education: Labels, Reasoning and Transfer.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 4: 697–703. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9133-x.
   Google Scholar
• Sasmaz-Ören, F., and Ü. Ormancı. 2012. “An Application about Pre-Service Teachers’ Development and Use of Worksheets and an Evaluation of Their Opinions about the Application.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12 (1): 263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Sayhan, H., S. Sayhan, and Ç. Öztürk-Demirbaş. 2013. “Ecological Footprints of Primary School Students and Recommendations to Diminish Them.” American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 13 (4): 521–530.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. 1972. “Some Aspects of the Correspondence between Content Structure and Cognitive Structure in Physics Instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (3): 225–234. doi:10.1037/h0032652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherren, K. 2005. “Balancing the Disciplines: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Sustainability Curriculum Content.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 21: 97–106. doi:10.1017/S0814062600000987.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. J., and P. A. Metz. 1996. “Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry through Microscopic Representations.” Journal of Chemical Education 73 (3): 233. doi:10.1021/ed073p233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, M., G. Corney, and A. Childs. 2003. “Teaching Sustainable Development in Primary Schools: An Empirical Study of Issues for Teachers.” Environmental Education Research 9 (3): 327–346. doi:10.1080/13504620303458.
   Google Scholar
• Tatlılıoğlu, E. 2019. “Analysis of Science Curriculum and Textbooks in Terms of Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study.” Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Tenam-Zemach, M., M. Kirchgessner, J. Pecore, L. Lai, and S. Hecht. 2014. “Development of an Innovative Method for Analyzing the Presence of Environmental Sustainability Themes and an Ecological Paradigm in Science Content Standards.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 41: 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Council for Environmental Education, 1998. Council for Environmental Education Agenda for Action 1998-2001: Shaping Education for the 21st Century. London: ERIC, pp.1–17
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. 2012. “Socio-Scientific Issues, Sustainability and Science Education.” Research in Science Education 42: 155–163. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9262-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005a. “What Is Education for Sustainable Development? 7 May 2021” https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005b. “UN Decade of ESD 7 May 2021.” https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd/un-decade-of-esd
   Google Scholar
• URL-1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INLyfernZQ4
   Google Scholar
• Weber, N. R., J. Strobel, M. A. Dyehouse, C. Harris, R. F. David, J. Fang, and I. Hua. 2014. “First-Year Students’ Environmental Awareness and Understanding of Environmental Sustainability through a Life Cycle Assessment Module.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (1): 154–181. doi:10.1002/jee.20032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennersten, L., H. Wanselin, S. Wikman, and M. Lindahl. 2020. “Interpreting Students’ Ideas on the Availability of Energy and Matter in Food Webs.” Journal of Biological Education 1–21. doi:10.1080/00219266.2020.1858935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., and R. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. London: Palmer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiyarsi, A., H. Pratomo, and E. Priyambodo. 2020. “Vocational High School Students’ Chemical Literacy on Context-Based Learning: A Case of Petroleum Topic.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 17 (1): 147–161. doi:10.36681/tused.2020.18.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. C., J. Ebenezer, and R. Boone. 2013. “Effects of an Intellectually Caring Model on Urban African-American Alternative High School Students’ Conceptual Change and Achievement in Chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14: 390–407. doi:10.1039/C3RP00021D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarime, M., G. Trencher, T. Mino, R. W. Scholz, L. Olsson, B. Ness, N. Frantszeskaki, and J. Rotmans. 2012. “Establishing Sustainability Science in Higher Education Institutions: Towards an Integration of Academic Development, Instutionalization, and Stakeholder Collaborations.” Sustainability Science: Bridging the Gap between Science and Society 7 (1): 101–113. doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0157-5.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, I., and H. Bakırcı. 2019. “The Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model Based Science Education on Entrepreneurship Skills of Secondary School Students.” International Journal of Progressive Education 15 (6): 134–150. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.9.
   Google Scholar
• Yurtbakan, E. , Çalık, M. , Güler, T. . 2021 Investigating Fourth Grade Students’ Conceptual Growth of the ‘Organic and Nonorganic Foods’ Subject: A Case of Common Knowledge Construction Model . Hacettepe University Journal of Education 36 3 544–561 doi:10.16986/HUJE.2020058881
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2014. “A Meta-Analysis Method to Advance Design of Technology-Based Learning Tool: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research to Understand Learning in Relation to Different Technology Features.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 23 (1): 145–159. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9460-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar