Policy responses to the decline in the number of students choosing biology beyond compulsory school level in Mauritius

References

• Atchia, M. C. S. 2019. “Public Understanding of Science.” In Science Education: Visions of the Future, edited by B. Akpan. Abuja, Nigeria: Next Generation Education 335–349 .
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J. S. 1994. Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2011. How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barmby, P., P. M. Kind, and K. Jones. 2008. “Examining Changing Attitudes in Secondary School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (8): 1075–1093. doi:10.1080/09500690701344966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, P. 2005. “Voice and Agency of Teachers: Missing Link in the National Curriculum Framework”. Economic and Political Weekly 40: 4347–4356.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and S. Hogarth. 2009. “Would You Want to Talk to a Scientist at a Party? High School Students’ Attitudes to School Science and to Science.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (14): 1975–1998. doi:10.1080/09500690802425581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BERA. 2018. “Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, Fourth Edition”. Available at https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018-online
   Google Scholar
• Cavas, P. 2011. “Factors Affecting the Motivation of Turkish Primary Students for Science Learning.” Science Education International 22 (1): 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cerini, B., I. Murray, and M. J. Reiss 2003. “Student Review of the Science Curriculum: Major Findings.” Planet Science, Institute of Education, Science Museum, University of London, London, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18429.31206. Available at https://www.academia.edu/40836145/Student_Review_of_the_Science_Curriculum_Major_Findings
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., V. Braun, G. Terry, and N. Hayfield. 2019. “Thematic Analysis.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Health and Social Sciences, edited by P. Liamputtong, 843–860. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. 2004. “Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the Relationship between the Institutional Environment and the Classroom.” Sociology of Education 77 (3): 211–244. doi:10.1177/003804070407700302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. 1995. “The Hidden Variable: How Organizations Influence Teacher Responses to Secondary Science Curriculum Reform.” Theory into Practice 34 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1080/00405849509543651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R. 1989. ““The State and Education Policy”. Reviewed by C. D. Raab, M. David, and R. Levitas.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 11 (1): 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. 2010. The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Social Research Projects. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education: Open University Press, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Devetak, I., E. D. Lorber, M. Jurisevic, and S. A. Glazar. 2009. “Comparing Slovenian Year 8 and Year 9 Elementary School Pupils’ Knowledge of Electrolyte Chemistry and Their Intrinsic Motivation.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10 (4): 281–290. doi:10.1039/b920833j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. 2009. “The Link between Policy and Practice in Science Education: The Role of Research”. Science Education 93 (6): 1076–1095. doi:10.1002/sce.20349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2001. “Students as Radical Agents of Change.” Journal of Educational Change 2 (2): 123–141. doi:10.1023/A:1017949213447.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2014. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. fifth edition ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., and H. J. Walberg. 1995. Improving Science Education. Illinois: National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE).
   Google Scholar
• George, R. 2006. “A Cross-domain Analysis of Change in Students’ Attitudes toward Science and Attitudes about the Utility of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 571–589. doi:10.1080/09500690500338755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. 1999. “Paradigms and Research Methods”, Research Methods Forum, 4, Academy of Management, http://division.aomonline.org/rm/1999_RMD_Forum_Paradigms_and_Research_Methods.htm Accessed October 3 2009
   Google Scholar
• Goodwillie, S. 1993. Voices from the Future: Our Children Tell Us about Violence in America. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. E., G. A. Marcoulides, P. H. Oliver, and P. H. Oliver. 2009. “A Latent Curve Model of Parental Motivational Practices and Developmental Decline in Math and Science Academic Intrinsic Motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 729–739. doi:10.1037/a0015084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Z. R., and H. S. Lin. 2011. “An Investigation of Students’ Personality Traits and Attitudes toward Science.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (7): 1001–1028. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.524949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunma, V. 2002. “Secondary School Science and Technology in Mauritius.” Science & Education 11 (5): 497–577. doi:10.1023/A:1016541819731.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. 2000. “Putting Students at the Centre in Education Reform.” International Journal of Educational Change 1 (2): 155–172. doi:10.1023/A:1010024225888.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, F., and R. J. Murnane 2005. “How Computerized Work and Globalization Shape Human Skill Demands”. Paper presented at the Planning Meeting on 21st Century Skills, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2013. “The Impact of Research on Education Policy in an Era of Evidence-based Policy.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (2): 113–131. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.781515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, T., and F. Quinn. 2010. Choosing Science: Understanding the Declines in Senior High School Science Enrolments. Australia: National Centre of Science, ICT and Mathematics Education for Rural and Regional Australia (SiMERR A), University of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T., and F. Quinn. 2015. “Understanding Declining Science Participation in Australia: A Systemic Perspective.” In Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education, edited by E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, and J. Ryder, 153–168. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_10.
   Google Scholar
• Maulloo, A. K., and J. Naugah. 2017. “Upper Secondary Education in Mauritius: A Case Study.” https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/topics/education-skills/Broadening%20the%20curriculum/Mauritius-case-study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mauritius Research Council. 2001. “Thematic Working Group, Science and Technology Education: Final Report.”
   Google Scholar
• McQuillan, P. J. 2005. “Possibilities and Pitfalls: A Comparative Analysis of Student Empowerment.” American Educational Research Journal 42 (4): 639–670. doi:10.3102/00028312042004639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2016a. “National Curriculum Framework – NCF.” Ministry of Education and Human Resources, National Curriculum Framework Pre-Primary. http://www.gov.mu/portal/site/education
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2016b. “National Curriculum Framework – NCF”. Ministry of Education and Human Resources, National Curriculum Framework Primary, http://www.gov.mu/portal/site/education
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2016c. “National Curriculum Framework – NCF”. Ministry of Education and Human Resources. National Curriculum Framework Lower Secondary, http://www.gov.mu/portal/site/education
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2017. Inspiring Every Child. Mauritius: Ministry of Education and Human Resources, Tertiary Education, Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. 2005b. “The Political Implications of Positioning in Student Voice Activities”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal: Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. 2007. “Student Voice in School Reform: From Listening to Leadership.” In International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School, edited by D. Thiessen, and A. Cook-Sather. Dordrecht: Springer, 587-610. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3367-2.
   Google Scholar
• Naugah, J., M. J. Reiss, and M. Watts. 2020. “Parents and Their Children’s Choice of School Science Subjects and Career Intentions: A Study from Mauritius.” Research in Science and Technological Education 38 (4): 463–483. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1645107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugah, J., and M. Watts. 2013. “Girls and Science Education in Mauritius: A Study of Science Class Practices and Their Effects on Girls.” Research in Science and Technological Education 31 (3): 252–268. doi:10.1080/02635143.2013.833901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naugah, J. 2011. “Factors Affecting the Choice of Science Subjects among Girls at Secondary Level in Mauritius.” PhD Thesis, Brunel University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. 2004. Basics of Social Science Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nudzor, H. 2009. “What Is “Policy”, a Problem-solving Definition or a Process Conceptualisation?” Educational Futures 2 (1). https://educationstudies.org.uk/journal/ef/volume-2-1-2009/
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. “What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Programme for International Student Assessment” Volume I www.pisa.oecd.org
   Google Scholar
• Owen, S., D. Dickson, M. Stanisstreet, and E. Boyes. 2008. “Teaching Physics: Students’ Attitudes Towards Different Learning Activities.” Research in Science and Technology Education 26 (2): 113–128. doi:10.1080/02635140802036734.
   Google Scholar
• Pay Research Bureau Report. 2008. Review of pay and grading structures and conditions of service in the public sector (civil service, parastatal and other statutory bodies, local authorities and Rodrigues regional assembly) and the private secondary schools, Republic of Mauritius, https://prb.govmu.org/Pages/PRB%20Reports/PRB2008/PRB2008Main.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., and A. Hasni. 2014. “Interest, Motivation and Attitude Towards Science and Technology at K-12 Levels: A Systematic Review of 12 Years of Educational Research.” Studies in Science Education 50 (1): 85–129. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, R., G. Hayward, A. Hodgson, J. Johnson, E. Keep, A. Oancea, G. Rees, K. Spours, and S. Wilde. 2009. Education for All: The Future of Education and Training for 14–19 Years Old. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C., J. Osti, and E. Hummel. 2012. “Decline in Interest in Biology in Elementary School Pupils during One Generation.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 8 (3): 201–205. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2012.835a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rughooputh, S. 2003. “Small Island Challenges in Educational Reforms: The Case of Mauritius”. [ Online]. Available at: http://irfd.org/events/wfsids/virtual/papers/sids_rughooputh4.pdf Accessed June 30 2020
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, J., and I. Banner. 2011. “Multiple Aims in the Development of a Major Reform of the National Curriculum for Science in England.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (5): 709–725. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.485282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, J. 2017. “Navigating Tensions: Education Policy and the Science Teacher.” Brazilian Journal of Research in Science Education 17 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Semali, L. M., and K. Mehta. 2012. “Science Education in Tanzania: Challenges and Policy Responses.” International Journal of Educational Research 53: 225–239. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., and N. M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, M. R. 2016. “Policy-making Theory as an Analytical Framework in Policy Analysis: Implications for Research Design and Professional Advocacy.” Physical Therapy 96 (1): 101–110. doi:10.2522/ptj.20150032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. 1994. “A Policy Analysis of Higher Education Reforms in Australia in the Context of Globalisation.” Melbourne Studies in Education 35 (1): 39–72. doi:10.1080/17508489409556268.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. 2007. “Teacher Development against the Policy Reform Grain: An Argument for Recapturing Relationships in Teaching and Learning.” Teacher Development 11 (2): 221–236. doi:10.1080/13664530701414837.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, V. 2010. “A Classroom as Wide as the World.” In Curriculum 21: Essential Education for a Changing World, edited by H. H. Jacobs. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, M., and B. A. U. Levinson. 2001. “Policy As/in Practice – A Sociocultural Approach to the Study of Educational Policy.” In Policy as Practice, edited by M. Sutton, and B. A. V. Levinson. Westport: Ablex 1–22 .
   Google Scholar
• Thapar, R. 2005. “National Curriculum Framework and the Social Sciences.” Social Scientist 33 (388–389): 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Tiglner, P. 1990. “Avoiding Science in the Elementary School.” Science Education 74 (4): 421–431. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S., and G. Ireson. 2014. “Fifteen Pupils’ Positive Approaches to Primary School Science: When Does It Decline?”. Education Studies 36 (2): 119–141. doi:10.1080/03055690903148662.
   Google Scholar
• Vedder-Weiss, D., and D. Fortus. 2011. “Adolescents’ Declining Motivation to Learn Science: Inevitable or Not?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (2): 199–216. doi:10.1002/tea.20398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L. 2001. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysis of Education Policy and Practices”. In Crossing Borders: New Frontiers in Education Research, edited by. W. Shilton and R. Jeffery. Fremantle, Western Australia ed. Vol. 1. 22. Coldstream, Victoria, Australia: Australian Association for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmarth, S. 2010. “Five Socio-technology Trends that Change Everything in Teaching and Learning.” In Curriculum 21: Essential Education for a Changing World, edited by H. H. Jacobs. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 80–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., and M. Freney. 2007. “Collaborative Peer Review: A Model for Promoting Reflective Practice, Improving Quality of Feedback and Enhancing Learning Outcomes.” Proceedings of HERDSA 2007 International Conference: Enhancing Higher Education, Theory and Scholarship, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar