Engaging seventh-grade students in prediction-observation-explanation of plant absorbance/transport phenomena: impact on relational conceptual changes and scientific inquiry abilities

References

• Akçay, S. 2017. “Prospective Elementary Science teachers’ Understanding of Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration in the Context of Multiple Biological Levels as Nested Systems.” Journal of Biological Education 51 (1): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1170067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W., T. H. Sheldon, and J. Dubay. 1990. “The Effects of Instruction on College nonmajors’ Conceptions of Respiration and Photosynthesis.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (8): 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apedoe, X. S. 2008. “Engaging Students in Inquiry: Tales from an Undergraduate Geology Laboratory-Based Course.” Science Education 92 (4): 631–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsy, H. I., A. P. B. Prasetyo, and B. Subali. 2019. “Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy with Group Investigation Effect on students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Learning Achievement.” Journal of Primary Education 9 (1): 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ayvacı, H. Ş. 2013. “Investigating the Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy on Teaching Photoelectricity Topic.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 12 (5): 548–564. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banawi, A., W. Sopandi, A. Kadarohman, and M. Solehuddin. 2019. “Prospective Primary School teachers’ Conception Change on States of Matter and Their Changes Through Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy.” International Journal of Instruction 12 (3): 359–374. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12322a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M., and M. Carr. 1989. “Teaching and Learning About Photosynthesis. Part 1: An Assessment in Terms of students’ Prior Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 11 (1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrutia, O., and J. R. Díez. 2021. “7 to 13-Year-Old students’ Conceptual Understanding of Plant Nutrition: Should We Be Concerned About Elementary teachers’ Instruction?” Journal of Biological Education 55 (2): 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1679655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., and K. Ryoo. 2008. “Teaching Science as a Language: A “Content-First” Approach to Science Teaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (5): 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. L., P. R. Pan, Y. T. Sung, and K. E. Chang. 2013. “Correcting Misconceptions on Electronics: Effects of a Simulation-Based Learning Environment Backed by a Conceptual Change Model.” Educational Technology & Society 16 (2): 212–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., and R. D. Roscoe. 2002. “The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change.” In Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by Limon M. and L. Mason, 3–27. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and J. Osborne. 2008. “Students’ Questions: A Potential Resource for Teaching and Learning Science.” Studies in Science Education 44 (1): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çıngıl Barış, Ç. 2022. “The Effect of the ‘Predict-Observe-Explain (POE)’ Strategy in Teaching Photosynthesis and Respiration Concepts to Pre-Service Science Teachers.” Journal of Biological Education 58 (2): 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2047097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinici, A., and Y. Demir. 2013. “Teaching Through Cooperative POE Tasks: A Path to Conceptual Change. The Clearing House.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues & Ideas 86 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2012.712557.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, C. 2004. “Ensuring Validity and Reliability in Phenomenographic Research Using the Analytical Framework of a Structure of Awareness.” Qualitative Research Journal 4 (2): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., A. Ayas, and M. Niaz. 2012. “Investigating the Effectiveness of a POE-Based Teaching Activity on students’ Understanding of Condensation.” Instructional Science 40 (1): 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., and D. F. Treagust. 2003. “Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., H. A. Schweingruber, and A. W. Shouse. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J. 2021. “Variation Theory of Learning Depiction. Machine Learning in Hybrid Science Pedagogical Spaces. Secondary Methods Course Package.”
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., S. Chacko, O. Kaya, K. Koya, and D. L. Ebenezer. 2010. “The Effects of Common Knowl- Edge Construction Model Sequence of Lessons on Science Achievement and Relational Conceptual Change.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., and O. N. Kaya. 2022. “Scientific Inquiry Rubric. Modified Machine Learning in Hybrid Science Pedagogical Spaces. Secondary Methods Course Package.”
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., O. N. Kaya, and D. L. Ebenezer. 2011. “Engaging Students in Environmental Research Projects: Perceptions of Fluency with Innovative Technologies and Levels of Scientific Inquiry Abilities.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (1): 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., O. N. Kaya, and D. Kassab. 2020. “High School Students’ Reasons for Their Science Dispositions: Community-Based Innovative Technology-Embedded Environmental Research Projects.” Research in Science Education 50 (4): 1341–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9735-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J., and T. Sutherland. 2024. “Variation Theory of Learning Depiction. Modified. Machine Learning in Hybrid Science Pedagogical Spaces. Secondary Methods Course Package.”
   Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, J. V., and P. J. Gaskell 1995. “Relational Conceptual Change in Solution Chemistry.” Science Education 79 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen, Y., and R. Stavy. 1988. “Students’ Understanding of Photosynthesis.” The American Biology Teacher 50 (4): 208–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, J. P., M. D. Gall, and W. Borg. 1999. Applying Educational Research: A Practical Guide. 4th ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Haysom, J., and M. Bowen. 2010. Predict, Observe, Explain: Activities Enhancing Scientific Understanding. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, V., and U. Shah. 2017. “A Phenomenographic Study of lecturers’ Conceptions of Using Learning Technology in a Pakistani Context.” Learning, Media and Technology 42 (2): 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1154074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. S., J. C. Chen, J. C. Hong, P. H. Chen, C. C. Lu, and S. Y. Chen. 2017. “A Five-Stage Prediction-Observation-Explanation Inquiry-Based Learning Model to Improve students’ Learning Performance in Science Courses.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13 (7): 3393–3416. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00735a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-Y., C.-C. Tsai, and J.-C. Liang. 2011. “Facilitating preschoolers’ Scientific Knowledge Construction via Computer Games Regarding Light and Shadow: The Effect of the Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) Strategy.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20 (5): 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9298-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsson, J., J. Schoult, and R. Saljo. 2002. “Map Reading versus Mind Reading: Revisiting children’s Understanding of the Shape of the Earth.” In Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, edited by M. Limon and L. Mason, 77–99. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., N. B. Songer, and S.-Y. Lee. 2007. “Evidentiary Competence: Sixth graders’ Understanding for Gathering and Interpreting Evidence in Scientific Investigations.” Research in Science Education 37 (1): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9014-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kala, N., F. Yaman, and A. Ayas. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Predict–Observe–Explain Technique in Probing students’ Understanding About Acid–Base Chemistry: A Case for the Concepts of pH, pOH and Strength.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11 (3): 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9354-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamustafaoglu, S., and R. Mamlok-Naaman. 2015. “Understanding Electrochemistry Concepts Using the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 11 (5): 923–936. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1364a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M., and D. F. Treagust. 2001. “Constructivism as a Referent in the Design and Development of a Computer Program Using Interactive Digital Video to Enhance Learning in Physics.” Australian Journal of Educational Technology 17 (1): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1773.
   Google Scholar
• Köse, S., B. Coştu, and O. F. Keser. 2003. “Determination of students’ Misconceptions in Science: Activities Through POE Method.” Pamukkale University Journal of Education 13 (1): 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., P. C. Blumenfeld, R. W. Marx, K. M. Bass, J. A. Fredricks, and E. Soloway. 1998. “Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 7 (3&4): 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., and C. M. Czerniak. 2007. Teaching Children Science in Elementary and Middle School Classrooms: A Project-Based Approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Latifah, S., I. Irwandani, A. Saregar, R. Diani, O. Fiani, W. Widayanti, and U. A. Deta. 2019. “How the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Learning Strategy Remediates students’ Misconception on Temperature and Heat Materials?” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1171:12051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012051.
   Google Scholar
• Liew, C., and D. Treagust. 1998. “The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in Diagnosing students’ Understanding of Science and in Identifying Their Levels of Achievement.” Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 13–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED420715.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, C., and D. Marshall. 2003. “Reflection and Phenomenography: Towards Theoretical and Educational Development Possibilities.” Learning & Instruction 13 (3): 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00002-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, C. C., J. C. Hong, and C. W. Tsai. 2008. “The Promotion of pupil’s Science Achievement and Scientific Inquiry Ability Through the Use of ‘5 Why’ Scaffolding Strategies—‘How to Make Bread’ Module as a Teaching Example.” Chinese Journal of Science Education 16 (4): 395–413.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, M. R., and S. Hsi. 2015. “Science-Relevant Curiosity Expression and Interest in Science: An Exploratory Study.” Science Education 99 (1): 70–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A. T., and J. R. Staver. 1995. “Peer Collaboration and Concept Development: Learning About Photosynthesis.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32 (1): 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybeck, L., F. Marton, H. Stromdahl, and A. Tulberg. 1988. “The Phenomenography of the “Mole Concept” in Chemistry.” In Improving Learning: New Perspectives, edited by P. Ramsden, 81–108. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography—Describing Conceptions of the World Around Us.” Instructional Science 10 (2): 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and A. B. M. Tsui. 2004. Classroom Discourse and the Space of Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W., Ed. 1998. The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and J. Krajcik. 2008. “Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of teachers’ Instructional Practices on Student Learning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (1): 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. 2022. Standards for the Preparation of High School (7-12) Science Teachers. Lansing, MI: HS Science Teacher Preparation Standards (michigan.gov). https://www.michigan.gov/mde/-/media/Project/Websites/mde/educator_services/prep/standards/HS_Science_Teacher_Preparation_Standards.pdf?rev=cc6a0c7226b94c78a81b47fff2f69122&hash=398961EB0190C07472D28B34664A7232.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, J. M., and J. Clement. 1999. “Use of a Computer Simulation to Develop Mental Simulations for Understanding Relative Motion Concepts.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (9): 921–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., B. C. Heddy, S. Jones, G. Taasoobshirazi, and M. Johnson. 2018. “Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning: Introducing the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change.” International Journal of Educational Psychology 7 (2): 151–195. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. “A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K–12 Science Education Standards.” In Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC: National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Özay, E., and H. Öztaş. 2003. “Secondary students’ Interpretations of Photosynthesis and Plant Nutrition.” Journal of Biological Education 37 (2): 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özden, S. 2020. “A Predict-Observe-Explain Cycle to Promote College students’ Scientific Explanations.” The School Science Review 102 (379): 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. 2009. “Student Interest Generated During an Inquiry Skills Lesson.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (2): 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson, and W. A. Gertzog. 1982. “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change.” Science Education 66 (2): 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207.
   Google Scholar
• Rybska, E., S. D. Tunnicliffe, and Z. A. Sajkowska. 2017. “Children’s Ideas About the Internal Structure of Trees: Cross-Age Studies.” Journal of Biological Education 51 (4): 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. 2018. “Analyzing Complex Systems: A Granular Approach.” Journal of Systems Engineering 5 (2): 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jse.2018.12345.
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., Y. Eisen, and D. Yaakobi. 1987. “How Students Aged 13-15 Understand Photosynthesis.” International Journal of Science Education 9 (1): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq, V. N., L. A. J. Stefan, A. C. Butcher, and D. J. A. Heylings. 1998. “Developing a New Approach to the Assessment of Project Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (3): 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230301.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., Z. Mthembu, and A. L. Chandrasegaran. 2014. “Evaluation of the Predict-Observe- Explain Instructional Strategy to Enhance students’ Understanding of Redox Reactions.” In Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom, edited by I. Devetak and S. Glažar, 265–286. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4366-3_14.
   Google Scholar
• Uke, I. 2022. Enacting a Photosynthesis and Cellular Learning Sequence in a Seventh Grade Class- room: Research into A Relational Conceptual Change Inquiry. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University, Wayne State University.
   Google Scholar
• Uke, I., J. Ebenezer, and O. N. Kaya. 2024. “Seventh-Grade Students’ Relational Conceptual Change and Science Achievement: Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration Duo.” Research in Science Education 54 (4): 707–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10156-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waheed, T., and A. M. Lucas. 1992. “Understanding Interrelated Topics: Photosynthesis at age 14+.” Journal of Biological Education 26 (3): 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. T., and R. F. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., Y. Kuo, K. Wu, H. Jen, and S. Hsu. 2018. “Learning Benefits of Secondary School students’ Inquiry-Related Curiosity: A Cross-Grade Comparison of the Relationships Among Learning Experiences, Curiosity, Engagement, and Inquiry Abilities.” Science Education 102 (5): 917–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P.-H., and H.-K. Wu. 2020. “Constructing a Model of Engagement in Scientific Inquiry: Investigating Relationships Between Inquiry-Related Curiosity, Dimensions of Engagement, and Inquiry Abilities.” Instructional Science 48 (1): 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09503-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar