501
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Practical and reconstructing Chinese pedagogics

Pages 652-667 | Published online: 17 Oct 2013

References

  • Alexander, R. (2008) Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. In K. Hall, P. Murphy and J. Soler (eds), Pedagogy and practice: culture and identities (Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications), 3–27.
  • Biesta, G. (2011) Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: a comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 175–192.
  • Bo. Y. H. (2011) 叶澜“生命.实践”教育学创建的思想路径 [The ideological path of Ye Lan’s ‘life-practice’ pedagogics]. Theoretical Front in Higher Education, 2011 (9), 19–28.
  • Cha, Y. L. (1986) 控制论, 信息论, 系统论与教育科学 [Cybernetics, Information Theory, Systems Theory and Educational Sciences]. (Chengdu: Sichuan Province Academy of Social Sciences Press).
  • Cheng, K. M. (1991) Challenging the north-south paradigm: educational research in East Asia. In G. Miron and K. Sorensen (eds), Strengthening Educational Research in Developing Countries. (Stockholm: Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences), 135–140.
  • Connelly, F. M. (2009) Being practical with Schwab: Research and teaching in the foothills of curriculum. In Proceedings of The Practical: An East-West Curriculum Dialogue (Beijing: Capital Normal University), 103–109.
  • Connelly, M. F. (2013) Joseph Schwab, curriculum, curriculum studies and educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45 (5), 622–639.
  • Connelly, M. and Xu, S. J. (2008) The landscape of curriculum and instruction: diversity and continuity. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He and J. Phillion (eds), Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications), 514–533.
  • Connelly, M. F. and Xu, S. (2010) An overview of research in curriculum inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker and P. Peterson (eds), International Encyclopaedia of Education. 3rd ed. (Oxford: Elsevier), 323–333.
  • Curran, T. D. (2005) Educational Reform in Republican China: The Failure of Educators to Create a Modern Nation. (Lewiston, ME: New York Edwin Mellen Press).
  • Deng, Z. (2011) Bringing curriculum studies and Pädagogik together: reconciling two competing traditions. Chinese Education and Society, 44(4), 9–24.
  • Deng, Z. (2012) Constructing Chinese didactics: (re)discovering the German didactics tradition. Jahrbuch für Allgemeine Didaktik (JfAD—Yearbook for General Didactics), 2, 108–128.
  • Deng, Z. (2013) On developing Chinese didactics: a perspective from the German Didaktik tradition. Paper presented at 57th Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society (CIES) (New Orleans, LA).
  • Ding, G. (2001) Nationalization and internationalization: two turning points in China’s education in the twentieth century. In G. Peterson, R. Hayhoe and Y. Lu (eds), Education, Culture, & Identity in Twentieth-Century China. (Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong Press), 161–186.
  • Ding, G. (2008) 教育学学科问题的可能性解释 [A possible interpretation of pedagogic disciplinary Issues]. Educational Research, 2008(2), 3–6.
  • Gundem, B. B. (2000) Understanding European didactics. In B. Moon, M. Ben- Peretz and S. Brown (eds), Routledge International Companion to Education. (London: Routledge), 235–262.
  • Hayhoe, R. (2006) Portraits of Influential Chinese Educators. (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong and Dordecht, Springer).
  • Hopmann, S. and Gundem, B. B. (1998) Conclusion–Didaktik meets curriculum: Toward a new agenda. In B. B. Gundem and S. Hopmann (eds), Didaktik and/or Curriculum: An International Dialogue. (New York, NY: Peter Lang), 331–354.
  • Huang, X. L. and Liu, L. (2009) 我们需要怎样的课程改革 [What kind of curriculum reform do we need?]. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 2009(7), 10–16.
  • Klafki, W. (1998) Characteristics of critical-constructive Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem and S. Hopmann (eds), Didaktik and/or Curriculum: An International Dialogue. (New York, NY: Peter Lang), 307–330.
  • Klafki, W. (2000) Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (eds), Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition. (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 139–159.
  • Künzli, R. (2013). Memorizing a memory: Schwab’s the Practical in a German context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45 (5), 668–683.
  • Li, L. H. and Zhong, W. J. (2005) 西方女性主义教育学及其在中国的实践 [Western Feminist pedagogics and its practice in China]. Jiangxi Educational Research, 2005(6), 7–12.
  • Liu, H. M. and Lin, D. (2008) Difficulties and outlets: on paradigm of China’s pedagogy. Frontiers of Education in China, 3(2), 163–177.
  • Lu, J. (2001). On the indigenousness of Chinese pedagogy. In R. Hayhoe and J. Pan (eds), Knowledge across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue among Civilizations (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong), 249–253.
  • Pinar, W. (2007) Intellectual Advancement through Disciplinarity: Verticality and Horizontality in Curriculum Studies. (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers).
  • Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. and Taubaum, P. M. (1995) Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. (New York, NY: Peter Lang).
  • Qiao, J. P. (1985) 信息科学与物理教学 [Information science and physics teaching]. Physics Teacher, 6, 5–8.
  • Qu, B. K., Zheng, J. Z. and Cheng, L. (2006) 中国教育学科的百年求索 [A review of the 20th century history of pedagogics in China. Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 3–11.
  • Reid, W. A. (1984) Curriculum, community, and liberal education: a response to the Practical 4. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1), 103–111.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1969) College Curriculum and Student Protest. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  • Schwab, J. J. (1978) The practical: Arts of eclectic. In J. J. Schwab, I. Westbury and N. J. Wilkof (eds), Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 322–364.
  • Schwab, J. J. (2013) [1970] The practical: a language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculumn Studies, 45 (5), 591–621.
  • Smith, D. G. and Gu, Y. S. (2000) 全球化与后现代敎育学 [Globalization and Postmodernist Pedagogics]. (Beijing: Educational Science Press).
  • Wang, C. S. (2004) 认真对待 ‘轻视知识’的教育思潮 [A critical reflection on the thought of “despising knowledge” in Chinese basic education]. Peking University Education Review, 2(3), 5–23.
  • Wang, C. S. (2008) ‘新课程理念’, ‘概念重建运动’ 与学习凯洛夫教育学 [‘The new curriculum rationale’, ‘Concept reconstruction movement’, and Kairov’s pedagogics]. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 28(7), 3–21.
  • Westbury, I. (1972) The character of a curriculum for a “practical” curriculum. Curriculum Theory Network, 10, 25–36.
  • Westbury, I. (2000) Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum? In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (eds), Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 15–39.
  • Westbury, I. (2007) Theory and theorizing in curriculum studies. In E. Forsberg (ed), Curriculum Theory Revisited, Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, Research Reports 7. (Uppsala: Uppsala University), 1–19.
  • Westbury, I. (2013). Reading Schwab’s “Practical” as an invitation to enquiry—Forty years on. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45 (5), 640–651.
  • Wraga, W. G. (2002) Recovering curriculum practice: continuing the conversation. Educational Researcher, 31 (6), 17–19.
  • Wraga, W. G. and Hlebowitsh, P. S. (2003) Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 425–437.
  • Wu, G. (1995) 教育学 的 练 结 [The end of pedagogics]. Educational Research, 7, 19–24.
  • Wu, Y. P. (2011) 学校深化素质教育研究——以 “新基础教育” 学校转型性变革研究为例[Research on deepening of quality education in schools: a case study of school transformation and reform of New Basic Education]. Basic Education, 8(1), 19–31.
  • Yang, R. (2005) Internationalisation, indigenisation and educational research in China. Australian Journal of Education, 49(1), 66–88.
  • Ye, L. (1999) 教育研究方法论初探 [Initial Research into Educational Methodology]. (Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press).
  • Ye, L. (2004) 中国教育学发展世纪问题的审视 [The development of pedagogics in China: a review of century-long issues]. Educational Research, 2004(7), 3–17.
  • Ye, L. (2009a) 基础教育改革与中国教育学理论重建研究 [Research on basic educational reform and the reconstruction of Chinese pedagogic theory]. (Beijing: Economic Science Press)).
  • Ye, L. (2009b) ‘New Basic Education’ and me. Frontiers of Education in China, 4(4), 558–609.
  • Ye, L. (2009c) The roles and functions of university professionals in the cooperative research with elementary and secondary schools—based on the fifteen years’ experiences and thinking of the ‘New Basic Education Research’. In The Proceedings of the Practical: An East-West Curriculum Dialogue (Beijing: Capital Normal University), 32–42.
  • Yu, Z. Y. (2009) 教学论理论范式的比较与超越: 以大陆地区为例 [The comparison and.transcendence of pedagogical theory paradigm: Mainland China as an example]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 35 (6), 62–67.
  • Zhang, H. (1996) 批判理论与批判教育学探析[An initial review on critical theory and critical pedagogy]. Global Education, 4, 8–13.
  • Zhang, W. J. (2000) 后现代女性主义教育学述评[A post-modern feminist review on pedagogy]. Comparative Educational Review, 2, 47–49.
  • Zhao, Y., Zhang, G. M., Yang, W. Z., Kirkland, D., Han, X. and Zhang, J. W. (2008) A comparative study of educational research in China and United States. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(1), 1–17.
  • Zhong, Q. Q. and You, B. H. (2004) 發霉的奶酪 [Mouldy cheese]. Global Education, 10, 5–9.
  • Zhou, Y. (2011) Reflections on modern China and the progressive power of educational studies. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(2), 167–181.
  • Zierer, K. (2011) Pedagogical eclecticism. Journal of Educational Thought, 45(1), 3–20.
  • 为 ‘生命·实践教育学派’ 的创建而努力. 叶澜教授访谈录 [Working toward the development of the ‘life-practice’ pedagogics school. An interview with Prof. Ye Lan] (2004) Educational Research, 25 (2), 33–37.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.