Teacher involvement in curriculum design: need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise

References

• Agyei, D. D. (2012) Preparation of Pre-service Teachers in Ghana to Integrate Information and Communication Technology in Teaching Mathematics. (Enschede: University of Twente).
   Google Scholar
• Alayyar, G. M. (2011) Developing Pre-service Teacher Competencies for ICT Integration Through Design Teams. (Enschede: University of Twente).
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C. and Valanides, N. (2009) Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advance in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52, 154–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakah, M. A. B., Voogt, J. M. and Pieters, J. M. (2012) Advancing perspectives of sustainability and large-scale implementation of design teams in Ghana’s polytechnics: Issues and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 787–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. and Kelson, A. M. (1993) Problem-based Learning: A Total Approach to Education. (Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine). Available online at: http://wed.siu.edu/Faculty/bputnam/584/PBL%20Document.pdf, accessed June 5, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M. (1990) The Teacher-curriculum Encounter: Freeing Teachers From the Tyranny of Texts. (New York: State University of New York).
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, G. M. and Seixas, P. (1998) Subjects and disciplines: Asymmetries in a collaborative curriculum development project. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. (1999) Professionalism and teachers as designers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, K.F., King, R.A. and De Ruiter, J.A. (1991) Pedagogical content knowledge: A tentative model for teacher preparation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago).
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. J. (2009) Research in the midst of organized school reform: Versions of teacher community in tension. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 598–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, R.W., Davis, D.C., Calkins, D.E. and Gentili, K. (1995) Establishing engineering design competencies for freshman/sophomore students. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference (Atlanta).
   Google Scholar
• Crow, G. M. and Pounder, D. G. (2000) Interdisciplinary teacher teams: Context, design, and process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 216–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, C. (2011) CPD: Support strategies for professional learning, national initiatives and major curriculum reform. Improving Schools, 14(2), 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Da Ponte, J. P. (2012) A practice-oriented professional development programme to support the introduction of a new mathematics curriculum in Portugal. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 317–327.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A. and Krajcik, J. S. (2005) Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009) Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, W., Carey, L. and Carey, J. O. (1985) The Systematic Design of Instruction. (Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon).
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston, J. (1980) School-based Curriculum Development in Britain: A Collection of Case Studies. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
   Google Scholar
• Elizondo-Montemayor, L., Hernández-Escobar, C., Ayala-Aguirre, F. and Aguilar, G. M. (2008) Building a sense of ownership to facilitate change: The new curriculum. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T. (2009) Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Development of Pedagogical Design Capacity for Inquiry—An Activity-Theoretical Perspective. (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan).
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F. and Yoon, K. S. (2001) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, E. L. (1980) The independent learning in science model of school-based curriculum development. In J. Eggleston (ed), School-based Curriculum Development in Britain: A Collection of Case Studies. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 14–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, K. L. (2002) Instructional design tools: A critique and projections for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), 59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, K. L. and Branch, R. M. (2002) Survey of Instructional Development Models. 4th ed. (Syracuse: Syracuse University).
   Google Scholar
• Handelzalts, A. (2009) Collaborative Curriculum Design in Teacher Design Teams. (Enschede: University of Twente).
   Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L. (2003) The effects of instructional training on university teaching assistants. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(4), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., Ge, X. and Thomas, M. K. (2006) An investigation of development toward instructional design expertise. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(4), 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Havnes, A. (2009) Talk, planning and decision-making in interdisciplinary teacher teams: A case study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogveld, A. W. M. (2003) The Teacher as Designer of Competency-based Education. (Heerlen: Open University The Netherlands).
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M. (2004) Learning Together Leading Together: Changing Schools Through Professional Learning Communities. (New York: Teachers College Press).
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, T. (2009) Op weg naar een Instrument voor het Meten van Docentcompetenties voor het Ontwikkelen van Curricula [Towards an Instrument to Measure Teacher’s Competencies for the Development of Curricula]. (Enschede: University of Twente).
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. T. (1981) How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design. Instructional Science, 10, 363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, J. W. M. (1999) A relational approach to curriculum design. In J. J. H. Van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, N. Nieveen and T. Plomp (eds), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kessels, J. W. M. (2001) Learning in organisations: A corporate curriculum for the knowledge economy. Futures, 33(6), 497–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. and MacDonald, D. (2010) Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. and Yahya, K. (2007) Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., McNeill, K. L. and Reiser, B. J. (2007) Learning-goal-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. and Cranton, P. A. (2000) Exploring the scholarship of teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N. and Stiles, K. E. (1998) Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A. T. (2007) Research-based professional development: Teachers engaged in professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Lunenberg, M. (2002) Designing a curriculum for teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 25(2–3), 263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. (1990) Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, W. L. and Westbury, I. (1975) Stability and change: The public schools of Gary, Indiana, 1940–70. In W. A. Reid and D. F. Walker (eds), Case Studies in Curriculum Change: Great Britain and the United States. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1988) Case Study Research in Education. (San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. A. and Orey, M. A. (1991) Reconceptualizing the instructional design process: Lessons learned from cognitive science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago).
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., Handelzalts, A. and Homminga, S. (2005) Teacher design teams: A scenario for school-based curriculum innovation. Paper presented at the ECER (Dublin, Ireland).
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N. and Van der Hoeven, M. (2011) Building the curricular capacity of teachers: Insights from the Netherlands. In P. Picard and L. Ria (eds), Beginning Teachers: A Challenge for Educational Systems—CIDREE Yearbook 2011. (Lyon: ENS de Lyon, Institut français de l’Éducation), 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Odenthal, L. E. (2003) Op zoek naar Balans Een Onderzoek naar een Methode ter Ondersteuning van Curriculum Vernieuwing door Docenten [Searching for Balance: Researching Methods for Supporting Curriculum Renewal by Teachers]. (Enschede: University of Twente).
   Google Scholar
• Onderbouw-VO (2009) Blijvend in beweging. Vier jaar onderbouwontwikkeling. Monitor 2005–2008 [Staying in Movement. Four Years of Development: Yearly Evaluations 2005–2008]. (Zwolle: Onderbouw-VO).
   Google Scholar
• Parke, H. M. and Coble, C. R. (1997) Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1987) How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. 2nd ed. (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Peterat, L. (1993) Collaborating for change: Toward a global home economics education. Journal of Vocational Home Economics Education, 10(2), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005) Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (1991) Content knowledge and instructional practice in second language teacher education. In J. E. Alatis (ed), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991: Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art. (Georgetown: Georgetown University Press), 76–99.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C. and Foxon, M. (2001) Instructional design competences: The standards. 3rd ed. (Syracuse: Clearinghouse on Information & Technology Syracuse University).
   Google Scholar
• Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D. and Nelson, W. A. (2004) Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen (ed), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. 2nd ed. (Bloomington: Association for Educational Communications & Technology), 1099–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1973) The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81(4), 501–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seels, B. and Glasgow, Z. (1991) Survey of instructional design needs and competencies. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (Orlando, FL).
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987) Knowledge and teaching foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbeck, M. (1984) School-based Curriculum Development. (London: Harper & Raw).
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. (London: Heinemann Educational Books).
   Google Scholar
• Strijker, A. and Corbalan, G. (2011) Zoeken en Arrangeren met Leerlijnen [Searching and Arranging with Curricular Frameworks]. (Enschede: SLO).
   Google Scholar
• Thijs, A. and Van den Akker, J. J. H. (2009) Leerplan in Ontwikkeling [Curriculum in Development]. (Enschede: SLO).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. J. H. (2003) Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. J. H. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper and U. Hameyer (eds), Curriculum Landscapes and Trends. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., Van Veen, K. and Zwart, R. C. (2012) Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: a review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verloop, N. and Lowyck, J. (2003) Onderwijskunde: Een Kennisbasis voor Professionals [Educational Science: A Knowledge Base for Professionals]. (Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff BV).
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D. and Adams, A. (2008) A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D. F. (1975) Curriculum development in an art project. In W. A. Reid and D. F. Walker (eds), Case Studies in Curriculum Change: Great Britain and the United States. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 91–135.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, P. and Wilde, R. (2005) Developing a university course for online delivery based on learning objects: From ideals to compromises. Open Learning, 20(1), 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Fox, E. A., Wildemuth, B. M., Pomerantz, J. and Oh, S. (2006) Interdisciplinary curriculum development for digital library education. Digital Libraries: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities, 4312, 61–70.
   Google Scholar