Formulating ‘principles of procedure’ for the foreign language classroom: a framework for process model language curricula

References

• Alarcon Leiva, J., Hill, B., & Frites, C. (2014). Educación basada en competencias: hacia una pedagogía sin dicotomías [An education based on competences: Towards a pedagogy free of dychotomies]. Educaçao & Sociedade, 35, 569–586.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 7–33.10.1080/0305764042000183106
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (1986). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21 st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 25–45.10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. L. (2014). Democratizing didactic transposition: Negotiations between learners and their teacher in a secondary school. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 7, 1–26. doi:10.5294/laclil.2014.7.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Bobbit, J. F. (1920). The objectives of secondary education. In R. J. Gress (Ed.), Curriculum: Frameworks, criticism, and theory (pp. 135–144). Richmond, CA: McCrutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M. (2001). Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: What do teachers do? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 837–855.10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Downey, C., & Souza, A. (2013). Planning a competence-based curriculum: The case of four secondary schools in England. Curriculum Journal, 24, 335–350.10.1080/09585176.2012.731007
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, I, 1–47.10.1093/applin/I.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conselleria d’Educació. (2007, July 20). Retrieved January 20, 2015, from http://www.docv.gva.es/datos/2007/07/24/pdf/2007_9717.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (1991). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL – A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 4: Second and foreign language education(pp. 97–112). Philadelphia, PA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A. (2009). Language assessment in education: Tests, curricula, and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 90–100.10.1017/S0267190509090084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J., Early, M., & Stille, S. (2011). Frames of reference: Identity texts in perspective. In J. Cummins & M. Early(Eds.), Identity texts. The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools (pp. 21–43). London: Trentham & Institute of Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dautry, C.-L. (2004). Objectives in language teaching and learning. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 452–455). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Landsheere, V., & de Landsheere, G. (1975). Définir les objectifs de l’education [Defining objectives in education]. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). Giving voice to the students. What (de)motivates the in CLIL classes? In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning. From theory to practice (pp. 117–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., Muir, C., & Ibahim, Z. (2014). Directed motivational currents: Energising language learning by creating intense motivational pathways. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning. From theory to practice (pp. 9–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Education Development Center. (1972). Man: A course of study. Social Education, 36, 742–744.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. (1998). The curriculum experiment. Meeting the challenge of social change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. (2007). Reflecting where the action is. The selected works of John Elliott. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.10.1111/(ISSN)1473-4192
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P. (2009). Task-based language learning research: Expecting too much or too little? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 247–263.10.1111/(ISSN)1473-4192
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, S., & Elmore, R. F. (2004). Redesigning accountability systems for education. Columbia, SC: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking. Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• González-Bernal, M. I. (2008). Alcance y límites de un currículo basado en competencias [Range and limits of a competences-based curriculum]. Educación y Educadores, 11, 69–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2010). The branding of English and the culture of the new capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English language textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 31, 714–733.10.1093/applin/amq034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holme, R. (2003). Carrying a baby in the back: Teaching with an awareness of the cultural construction of language. In M. Byram & P. Grundy (Eds.), Context and culture in language teaching and learning (pp. 18–31). Clavedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Humanities Project. (1970). The humanities Project: An introduction. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Husch, D. (2007). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 493–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, O., & Dillon, K. (2008). Issues in heritage language learning in the United States. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger(Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and educaation. Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 143–156). Philadelphia, PA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2008). Applied linguistic theory and second/foreign language education. In N. van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 3–16). Philadelphia, PA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14, 99–112.10.1177/1362168809346520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee McKay, S. (2008). Sociolinguistics and language education. In N. van Deusen-Schol & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd edition, Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 17–28). New York, NY: Springer+Business Media LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. (2009). Process-oriented pedagogy: Facilitation, empowerment, or control? ELT Journal, 63, 246–254.10.1093/elt/ccn054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. D. Lambert& E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 191–196). Philadelphia, PA. : John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M. (2004). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 597–603). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. (2014). Motivation meets bilingual models. Goal-oriented behavior in the CLIL classroom. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning. From theory to practice (pp. 139–155). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing objectives for programmed instruction. Belmont, CA: Fearon.
   Google Scholar
• Male, B., & Waters,M. (2014). Designing the school curriculum. In A. Pollard (Ed.), Readings for reflective teaching in schools (pp. 214–216). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. (1997). Second language acquisition research: A resource for changing teachers' professional cultures?. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 80–93.10.1111/modl.1997.81.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKernan, J. (2007). The action inquiry seminar: Education in democratic classrooms. College Quarterly, 10(4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• McKernan, J. (2008). Curriculum and imagination. Process theory, pedagogy and action research. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam Webster Encyclopaedia. (2015, January 28). Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/concise/encyclopaedia%20britannica
   Google Scholar
• Moirano, M. C. (2012). Teaching the students and not the book: Addressing the problem of culture teaching in EFL in Argentina. Gist. Education and Learning Research Journal, 6, 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, D. (2004). Syllabus and curriculum design. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 590–594). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Í. (2007). Enhancing a process-oriented approach to literacy and language learning: The role of corpus consultation literacy. ReCALL, 19, 269–286.10.1017/S095834400700033X
   Google Scholar
• Perrenoud, P. (1999). Construir competencias desde la escuela [Building competences from school]. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T. (2008). Task-based instruction. In N. van Deusen-Schol & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd edition, Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 71–82). New York, NY: Springer+Business Media LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, J. F. (1765–1770). Kant in the classroom. Materials to aid the study of Kant’s lectures. Retrieved January 12, 2015, from http://www.manchester.edu/kant/lectures/lecturesListAccounts.htm#Braxein1
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J., & White, J. (2014). An aims-based curriculum illustrated by the teaching of science in schools. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 76–89.10.1080/09585176.2013.874953
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. (2013). The practical: A language for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 591–621.10.1080/00220272.2013.809152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawer, S. (2010). Communicative-based curriculum innovations between theory and practice: Implications for EFL curriculum development and student cognitive and affective change. The Curriculum Journal, 21, 333–359.10.1080/09585176.2010.506802
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286.10.1017/S0267190500003585
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780
   Google Scholar
• Skourtou, E., Kourtis-Kazoullis, V., & Cummins, J. (2006). Designing virtual learning environments for academic language development. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, & J.Hunsinger(Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 441–467). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-3803-7
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1981). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Stoks, G. L. (1996). Modern languages: Learning, teaching, assessment A common European framework of reference. Guide for curriculum developers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. (2013). OECD, ‘Key competencies’ and the new challenges of educational inequality. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 67–80.10.1080/00220272.2012.755711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D. (2013). Race to the top and leave the children behind. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 4–15.10.1080/00220272.2012.754946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. (2014). General language proficiency (GLP): Reflections on the ‘issues revisited’ from the perspective of a UK examination board. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11, 136–151.10.1080/15434303.2014.896366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instructio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Gunter, H. (2009). Students’ participation in school change: Action research on the ground. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 409–419). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857021021
   Google Scholar
• Ur, P. (2013). Language-teaching method revisited. ELT Journal, 67 (4), 468–474. doi:10.1093/elt/cct041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deusen-Scholl, N. (2008). Introduction to volume 4: Second and foreign language education. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and educaation. Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. xiii–ix). Philadelphia, PA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Els, T. (2004). Planning for foreign language teaching. In M. Byram (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 465–470). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Villacañas de Castro, L. S. (2013). Teaching English as a foreign language in accordance with Social-constructivist pedagogy. Tejuelo. Revista de Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura, 17, 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Villacañas de Castro, L. S. (2015a). ‘Why should I study English if I’m never going to leave this town?’ Developing alternative orientations to culture in the EFL classroom through CAR. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 37, 289–307.10.1080/10714413.2015.1065616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villacañas de Castro, L. S. (2015b). Critical pedagogy and Marx, Vygotsky and Freire: Phenomenal forms and educational action research. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 101–118.10.1080/00220272.2013.764505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar