Response and responsibility: fabrication of the eco-certified citizen in Swedish curricula 1962–2011

References

• Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 17–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, S., & Östman, L. (2013). Globalisation and education for sustainable development: Emancipation from context and meaning. Environmental Education Research, 19, 477–498.10.1080/13504622.2012.709822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2011a). The ignorant citizen: Mouffe, Ranciére, and the subject of democratic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30, 141–153.10.1007/s11217-011-9220-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2011b). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-512-3
   Google Scholar
• Breiting, S., & Wickenberg, P. (2010). The progressive development of environmental education in Sweden and Denmark. Environmental Education Research, 16, 9–37.10.1080/13504620903533221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., & Kallós, D. (1997). Lessons from a comprehensive school system for curriculum theory and research: Sweden revisited after twenty years. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29, 407–430.10.1080/002202797183973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Mifflin: Houghton.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, M., & Olson, M. (2014). Citizenship in the making for a new millenium – Education and citizen formation in 21st century Sweden. Utbildning & Demokrati, 23, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., Senellart, M., & Davidson, A. I. (2007). Security, territory, population. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245075
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, D. (2014). Democratic education as a curricular problem: Historical consciousness and the moralizing limits of the present. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• González-Gaudiano, E. (2005). Education for sustainable development: Configuration and meaning. Policy Futures in Education, 3, 243–250.10.2304/pfie
   Google Scholar
• Gough, S., & Scott, W. (2006). Education and sustainable development: A political analysis. Educational Review, 58, 273–290.10.1080/00131910600748026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2006). Making up people. London Review of Books, 28, 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hasslöf, H., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Critical thinking as room for subjectification in Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research., 21, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursh, D., Henderson, J., & Greenwood, D. (2015). Environmental education in a neoliberal climate. Environmental Education Research, 21, 299–318.10.1080/13504622.2015.1018141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Governing ‘eco-certified children’ through pastoral power: Critical perspectives on education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 21, 173–182.10.1080/13504622.2013.879696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, P. (1991). Det oersättliga. En teknologietik [ In Swedish]. Stockholm: Symposion.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, B. (2013). Swedish environmental and sustainability education research in the era of post-politics? Utbildning & Demokrati, 22, 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kryger, N. (2004). Childhood and ‘new learning’ in a Nordic context. In H. Brembeck, B. Johansson, & J. Kampmann (Eds.), Beyond the competent child. Exploring contemporary childhoods in the Nordic welfare societies (pp. 127–152). Fredriksberg: Roskilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Læssøe, J. (2010). Education for sustainable development, participation and socio-cultural change. Environmental Education Research, 16, 39–57.10.1080/13504620903504016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.10.1086/ci.2004.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2000). A new kind of order: Swedish policy texts related to governance, social inclusion and exclusion in the 1990s. In S. Lindblad & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Public discourses on education governance and social integration and exclusion: Analyses of policy texts in European contexts (pp. 159–194). Uppsala: Department of Education, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2002). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets – And then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17, 687–697.10.1080/0268093022000032328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Ross, H. (2011). The global dimension in education and education for global citizenship: Genealogy and critique. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 443–456.10.1080/14767724.2011.605327
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M. (2012). Education for Y’all: Global neoliberalism and the case for a politics of scale in sustainability education policy. Policy Futures in Education, 10, 165–177.10.2304/pfie
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. (Ed.). (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Earth Island Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. (2000). Futures of the present: From performativity to prehension. In N. Brown, B. Rappert, & A. Webster (Eds.), Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science (pp. 21–39). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social Research, 66, 745–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Education [Skolöverstyrelsen]. (1969). Läroplan för grundskolan [Curriculum for the compulsory school]. Stockholm: Svenska utbildningsförlaget Liber.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Education [Skolöverstyrelsen]. (1980). Läroplan för grundskolan, Lgr 80 [Curriculum for the compulsory school, Lgr 80]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoll, K., Fejes, A., Olson, M., Dahlstedt, M., & Biesta, G. (2013). Opening discourses of citizenship education: A theorization with Foucault. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 828–846.10.1080/02680939.2013.823519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century. Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul. The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 3–34.10.3102/00028312041001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2007). Alchemies and governing: Or, questions about the questions we ask. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 64–83.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00240.x
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform. Science, education and making society by making the child. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2009a). Curriculum study, curriculum history, and curriculum theory: The reason of reason. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 301–319.10.1080/00220270902777021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2009b). Globalization as a system of reason: The historical possibility and the political in pedagogical policy and research. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108, 247–267.10.1111/ysse.2009.108.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Pykett, J. (2007). Making citizens governable? The Crick report as governmental technology. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 301–319.10.1080/02680930701269202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A., Gill, J., & Sears, A. (2010). The forming of citizens in a globalising world. In A. Reid, J. Gill, & A. Sears (Eds.), Globalization, the nation-state and the citizen: Dilemmas and directions for civics and citizenship education (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488856
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2010). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 271–303.10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal National Board of Education [Kungliga skolöverstyrelsen] (1962). Läroplan för grundskolan [Curriculum for the compulsory school]. Stockholm: Kungliga skolöverstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Schindel Dimick, A. (2015). Supporting youth to develop environmental citizenship within/against a neoliberal context. Environmental Education Research, 21, 390–402.10.1080/13504622.2014.994164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerville, J., Adkins, B., & Kendall, G. (2008). Community participation, rights, and responsibilities: The governmentality of sustainable development policy in Australia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 696–711.10.1068/c67m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund, L., & Öhman, J. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20, 639–659.10.1080/13504622.2013.833585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education [Skolverket]. (1994). Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet Lpo 94 [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, Lpo 94]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education [Skolverket]. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D. (2009a). Globalizing globalization: The neo-institutional concept of a world culture. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108, 29–48.10.1111/ysse.2009.108.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D. (2009b). Harmonizing the educational globe. World polity, cultural features, and the challenges to educational research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D. (2013). Pestalozzi and the educationalization of the world. New York, NY: Palgrave Pivot.10.1057/9781137346858
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D., Popkewitz, T. S., & Labaree, D. F. (2011). Schooling and the making of citizens in the long nineteenth century: Comparative visions. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• UNCED. (1993). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Public Information.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., Goeminne, G., & Vandenabeele, J. (2016). Revisiting the democratic paradox of environmental and sustainability education: Sustainability issues as matters of concern. Environmental Education Research, 1–21. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.966659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedin, T. (2013). Ideological continuity and discursive changes in the Swedish educational system. LIR Journal, 3, 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 58–80.10.1080/00220272.2013.812681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar