The way ahead for Finnish comprehensive school? Examining state-level school administrators’ theory of change

References

• Albright, J., Knezevic, L., & Farrell, L. (2013). Everyday practices of teachers of English: A survey at the outset of national curriculum implementation, 36, 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Daami, K., & Wallace, G. (2007). Curriculum reform in a global context: A study of teachers in Jordan. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 339–360. doi:10.1080/00220270601057790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alok, K. (2012). Anchors for educational reforms. International Journal of Educational Reform, 21, 276–291.
   Google Scholar
• Altinyelken, H. K. (2010). Curriculum change in Uganda: Teacher perspectives on the new thematic curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 151–161. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslantas, H. I. (2011, February). Evaluation of elementary school inspectors’ occupational helps and guidance to teachers about new curriculum. Educational Research and Reviews, 6, 215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basic Education Legislation 628/1998.
   Google Scholar
• Beane, J. A. (1995). Toward a coherent curriculum (1995 ASCD Yearbook). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bernelius, V. (2011). Osoitteenmukaisia oppimistuloksia?: kaupunkikoulujen eriytymisen vaikutus peruskoululaisten oppimistuloksiin Helsingissä [No english translation available of the name. Let's take this reference away from the reference list and from the text]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 76, 479–493.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2013). Knowledge, judgement and the curriculum: On the past, present and future of the idea of the practical. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 684–696. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.798839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbitt, J. (1972). The curriculum. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230244276
   Google Scholar
• Broadhead, P. (2001). Curriculum change in Norway: Thematic approaches, active learning and pupil cooperation—from curriculum design to classroom implementation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 19–36. doi:10.1080/00313830020023375
   Google Scholar
• Brundrett, M., & Duncan, D. (2011). Leading curriculum innovation in primary schools. Management in Education, 25, 119–124. doi:10.1177/0892020610387957
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkey: A case of primary school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3, 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, A. (2005). The “voice of the teacher” in curriculum development: A voice crying in the wilderness? South African Journal of Education, 25, 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. K. S. (2010). Teachers’ responses to curriculum policy implementation: Colonial constraints for curriculum reform. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9, 93–106. doi:10.1007/s10671-010-9082-5
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, P. M. (2011). Effects of school heads’ and teachers’ agreement with the curriculum reform on curriculum development progress and student learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 453–473.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, R. (1976). The utility of system models and developmental models for practitioners. In W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne, R. Chin, & K. E. Corey (Eds.), The planning of change (3rd ed., pp. 90–102). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, L. (2005). The making of South Africa’s national curriculum statement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 193–208.10.1080/0022027042000236163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 195–205.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Curriculum for Basic Education. (2004). Read 2015, December 12. Retrieved from http://oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1992). Curriculum stability and change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 216–245). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 121–153.10.1177/0013161X04269578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Stringfield, G., & Borman, S. (2000). School reform through a highly spesified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the core knowledge sequence. The Elementary School Journal 101, 167–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1959). Dewey on education. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2015, August). Expanding the objects from school to life: Educational research approaching crossroads. In R. Wegerif ( Chair), Interplay of teachers’ professional competencies, teaching actions and student learning. Symposium conducted at EARLI-conference, Limassol, Cypros.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, T., Ritchie, G., & Barker, M. (2008). A sociocultural analysis of mandated curriculum change: The implementation of a new senior physics curriculum in New Zealand schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 187–213.10.1080/00220270701313978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2015a). Curriculum 2016 web page. Retrieved April 24, 2015 from http://www.oph.fi/ops2016
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2015b). Web page. Retrieved May 25, 2015 from http://www.oph.fi/english/about_fnbe
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn’t. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 745–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu, D. (2008). Primary and secondary curriculum development in Afghanistan. Prospects, 37, 427–448. doi:10.1007/s11125-008-9058-x
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J., & Farrell, L. (2013). Remaking the professional teacher: Authority and curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 634–655. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.854410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glacer, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, E. T., & Lane, B. (2002). “We’re from the state and we’re here to help”: State-level innovations in support of high school improvement ( Paper 63). Faculty Publications, Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teachers College Record, 108, 1241–1265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00692.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harðarson, A. (2013). Equality and academic subjects. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 119–131.10.1080/00220272.2012.757806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable leadership and development in education: Creating the future, conserving the past. European Journal of Education, 42, 223–233.10.1111/ejed.2007.42.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2003). On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 459–478.10.1080/00220270305520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. (1992). Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesson, I. A., Lindblad, S., & Simola, H. (2002). An inevitable progress? Educational restructuring in Finland, Iceland and Sweden at the turn of the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 325–339.10.1080/0031383022000005706
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2004). The curriculum theory and practice (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2005). Alignment, high stakes, and the inflation of test scores ( Vol. CSE report). Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 104, 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, I. (2008). Evaluation of teachers for restructured elementary curriculum (grades 1 to 5). Education, 129, 205–258.
   Google Scholar
• Korotkov, D. L. (1998). The sense of coherence: Making sense out of chaos. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 51–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, D. (1973). Social change, educational theory and curriculum planning. London: Hodden and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Ni, Y. (2011). Impact of curriculum reform: Evidence of change in classroom practice in mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 71–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Merkens, H., Geppert, M., & Antal, D. (2001). Triggers of organizational learning during the transformation process in central European countries. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), The handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 242–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E. (2015). State-based curriculum-making: Approaches to local curriculum work in Norway and Finland. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 441–461. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1039067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Welfare. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.thl.fi/fi/web/thlfi-en
   Google Scholar
• Nevalainen, R., Kimonen, E., & Hämäläinen, S. (2001). Curriculum changes in the Finnish comprehensive school. The lessons of three decades. In E. Kimonen (Ed.), Curriculum approaches. Readings and activities for educational studies (pp. 123–141). Department of Teacher Education and Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What It is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297–321. doi:10.3102/01623737023004297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S. W. (2009). Why did principals and teachers respond differently to curriculum reform? Teacher Development, 13, 187–203.10.1080/13664530903335558
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., Li, Q., Li, X., & Zhang, Z.-H. (2011). Influence of curriculum reform: An analysis of student mathematics achievement in Mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 100–116. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.). (2012). Miracle of education. The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en
   Google Scholar
• Pahkin, K., Vanhala, A. & Lindström, K. (2007). Opettajien työssä jaksaminen ja jatkaminen—QPS Nordic-ADW—Monitoring Age Diverse Workforce. Helsinki: Opettajien Ammattijärjestö OAJ,Työterveyslaitos.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2011). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10833-010-9140-z
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Biesta, G. (Eds.). (2013). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2013). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active agents in school reforms? Journal of Educational Change, 13, 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ramparsad, R. (2005). A strategy for teacher involvement in curriculum development. South African Journal of Education, 21, 287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, J. M. (2007). An uncertain harvest: A case study of implementation of innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 97–121. doi:10.1080/00220270500532448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan, J., & Aldous, C. (2005). Relationships between the constructs of a theory of curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 313–336. doi:10.1002/tea.20054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenmund, M. (2000). OP-ED approaches to international comparative research on curricula and curriculum-making processes. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 599–606. doi:10.1080/00220270050116905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, A., Salmela, S., & Vilkkilä, J. (2014). Governing autonomy: Subjectivity, freedom, and knowledge in Finnish curriculum discourse. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011a). Finnish lessons. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011b). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 173–185. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
   Google Scholar
• Salmela-Aro, K., Kiuru, N., Pietikäinen, M., & Jokela, J. (2008). Does school matter? European Psychologist, 13, 12–23.10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 838–844.10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracaloğlu, S., Yılmaz, S., Çengel, M., Çöğmen, S., Karademir, Ç. A., & Kanmaz, A. (2010). Elementary teachers’ views about their roles in curriculum development and evaluation process: The case of Denizli. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2427–2434. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.349
   Google Scholar
• Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning. For better teaching and learning (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schiro, M. S. (2008). Curriculum theory. Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 949–965. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R. (2012). Goodbye conflict, hello development? Curriculum reform in Timor-Leste. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Ma, X. (2006). Does systemic change work? Curricular and instructional practice in the context of systemic change. Leadership and Policy in Schools 5, 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41, 455–470. doi:10.1080/03050060500317810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simola, H., Rinne, R., Varjo, J., & Kauko, J. (2013). The paradox of the education race: How to win the ranking game by sailing to headwind. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 612–633. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2013). Design research approach in the large scale educational innovations. In I. R. Haslam, S. K. Myint, & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Large scale reform and social capital building: The professional development imperative (pp. 70–92). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy Implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Toom, A., & Husu, J. (2012). Finnish teachers as ‘makers of the many’. Balancing between broad pedagogical freedom and responsibility. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6091-811-7
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitikka, E. (2009). Opetussuunnitelman mallin jäsennys. Sisältö ja pedagogiikka kokonaisuuden rakentajina. [Structuring of the Curriculum Design: Content and Pedagogy Constructing the Whole]. Helsinki:University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Soltis, J. F. (1997). Curriculum and aims. Columbia, SC: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio-cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 357–381. doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.563447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., Sheffield, R., Rénnie, L., & Venville, G. (2007). Looking back, looking forward: Re-searching the conditions for curriculum integration in the middle years of schooling. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34, 29–49. doi:10.1007/BF03216856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, H. N. (1990). Curriculum reform and the legitimation of educational objectives: The case of the Federal Republic of Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 16(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, L. (2008). Making curricula. Why do states make curricula, and how? In F. M. Conelly (Ed.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 45–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, C. (2013). Relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their willingness to implement curriculum reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 22, 252–270.
   Google Scholar