884
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The achievement ideology of Reading Wonders: a critical content analysis of success and failure in a core reading programme

References

  • Altbach, P. G., & Kelly, G. P. (1988). Textbooks and the Third World: An overview. In P. G. Altbach & G. P. Kelly (Eds.), Textbooks in the Third World: Policy, content, and context (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Garland.
  • Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Champaign, IL: The Center for the Study of Reading.
  • Anyon, J. (1979). Ideology and United States History Textbooks. Harvard Educational Review, 49(3), 361–386.
  • Augustine, N. R. (1997). A new business agenda for improving U.S. schools. Issues in Science and Technology, 13(3), 57–62.
  • Beck, L. (1984). Developing comprehension: The impact of the directed reading lesson. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 3–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Berger, K. S. (2003). The developing person: Through childhood and adolescence (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
  • Bertram, B. (1984). A new point of view on children’s stories. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 153–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Billman, C. (1977). McGuffey’s readers and Alger’s fiction: The gospel of virtue according to popular children’s literature. Journal of Popular Culture, 11(3), 614–619.
  • Biraimah, K. L. (1988). Gender and textbooks: An African case study. In P. G. Altbach & G. P. Kelly (Eds.), Textbooks in the Third World: Policy, content, and context (pp. 115–139). New York, NY: Garland.
  • Bohning, G. (1986). The McGuffey Eclectic Readers: 1836–1986. The Reading Teacher, 40(3), 263–269.
  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Bourdieu, P, & Passeron, J.C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London, UK: Sage.
  • Boutte, G. S. (2002). The critical literacy process: Guidelines for examining books. Childhood Education, 78(3), 147–152.
  • Braker-Walters, B. A. (2014, November 6). Informational text and the Common Core: A content analysis of three basal reading programs. Sage Open, 4(4).
  • Brenner, D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2010). If I follow the teachers’ editions, isn’t that enough? Analyzing reading volume in six core reading programs. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 347–363.
  • Brooks, W., & Browne, S. (2012). Towards a culturally situated reader response theory. Children’s Literature in Education, 43(1), 74–85.
  • Busch, F. (1972). Interest, relevance, and learning to read. In S. G. Zimet (Ed.), What children read in school: Critical analysis of primary reading textbooks (pp. 19–26). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
  • Business Roundtable (2017). Education and workforce. Retrieved from www.businessroundtable.org/issues/education-workforce
  • California Assessment of State Performance and Progress (2017). Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/ca/
  • Cambria, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2010). Motivating and engaging students in reading. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 16–29.
  • Carr, M. D., & Wiemers, E. E. (2016). The decline in lifetime earnings mobility in the U.S.: Evidence from survey-linked administrative data. Washington, DC: Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Retrieved at http://equitablegrowth.org/equitablog/the-decline-in-lifetime-earnings-mobility-in-the-u-s-evidence-from-survey-linked-administrative-data/
  • Cavanaugh, S. (2015, July 2). McGraw-Hill Education sells key assets of testing business to DRC. Retrieved from https://marketbrief.edweek.org/marketplace-K-12/mcgraw-hill_education_sells_bulk_of_testing_business_to_data_recognition_corp/
  • Center, Y., Freeman, L., & Robertson, G. (2001). The relative effect of a code-oriented and a meaning-oriented early literacy program on regular and low-progress Australian students in Year 1 classrooms which implement reading recovery. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48(2), 207–232.
  • Chadwick, J. A. (2012). Making characters come alive: Using characters for identification and engagement. The English Journal, 102(1), 34–39.
  • Colemen, D., & Pimentel, S. (2012). Revised publishers’ criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and literacy, 3–12. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/assets/Publishers_Criteria_for_3-12.pdf
  • Colton, D., & Covert, R. W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Corak, M.(2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102.
  • Croghan, M. J., & Croghan, P. (1980). Role models and readers: A sociological analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
  • deCharms, R., & Moeller, G. H. (1962). Values expressed in American children’s readers: 1850–1950. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(2), 136–142.
  • Deng, Z. (2011). Revisiting curriculum potential. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(5), 538–559.
  • Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102–126.
  • Dubay, C. (2016, June 28). The biggest educational publishers. Retrieved from https://bookscouter.com/blog/2016/06/the-biggest-textbook-publishers/
  • Duncan-Owens, D. (2010). Commercial reading programmes as the solution for children living in poverty. Literacy, 44(3), 112–121.
  • Dutro, E. (2010). What “hard times” means: Mandated curricula, class-privileged assumptions, and the lives of poor children. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(3), 255–291.
  • Edelsky, C., & Bomer, R. (2005). Heads they win; tails we lose. In B. Altwerger (Ed.), Reading for profit: How the bottom line leaves kids behind (pp. 11–20). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Ferreira, F. (2013). Can we increase mobility by reducing inequality? Retrieved at https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2013/02/13/can-we-increase-mobility-by-reducing-inequality
  • Fingertip Facts on Education in California (2017). Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/ceffingertipfacts.asp
  • Forest, D. E., Garrison, K., & Kimmel, S. C. (2015). “The university for the poor”: Portrayals of class in translated children’s literature. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–40.
  • Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 286–291.
  • Fry, E. B. (1989). Readability formulas: Maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32(4), 292–297.
  • Fulmer, S. M., D’Mello, S. K., Strain, A., & Graesser, A. C. (2015). Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 98–110.
  • Garan, E. M. (2005). Scientific flimflam: A who’s who of entrepreneurial research. In B. Altwerger (Ed.), Reading for profit: How the bottom line leaves kids behind (pp. 21–32). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Global Publishing Leaders (2016a, August 26). Global publishing leaders: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/71298-global-publishing-leaders-2016-mcgraw-hill-education.html
  • Global Publishing Leaders (2016b, August 26). Global publishing leaders: Pearson Plc. Retrieved from www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/71298-global-publishing-leaders-2016-pearson-plc.html
  • Graesser, A. C., & D’Mello, S. (2012). Moment-to-moment emotions during reading. The Reading Teacher, 66(3), 238–242.
  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulakowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-metrix: Providing multi-level analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234.
  • Henry, D. (2012, November 16). McGraw-Hill sells textbook unit to private equity. Retrieved at www.reuters.com/article/us-mcgrawhill-apollo-idUSBRE8AP0N12012126
  • Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191–209.
  • Hollindale, P. (1988). Ideology and the children’s book. Signal, 55, 3–22.
  • Huckin, T. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 78–92). Washington, DC: United States Information Agency.
  • Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report # 3. Champaign, IL: NCTE.
  • Hyona, J., Destefano, C., Hujanen, H., Lindeman, J., Poskiparta, E., D’Heurle, A., & Niemi, P. (1995). Primers as socializing agents in American and Finnish schools. Comparative Education Review, 39(3), 280–298.
  • Imada, T. (2012). Cultural narratives of individualism and collectivism: A content analysis of textbook stories in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(4), 576–591.
  • Jaeger, E. (2012). Open court reading: stories of success for unsuccessful readers. In (Eds.), The new politics of the textbook (pp. 87-106). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
  • Johnson, H., Mathis, J., & Short, K. G. (2016). Critical content analysis of children’s and young adult literature: Reframing perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jordan, N. L. (2005). Basal readers and reading as socialization. What are children learning? Language Arts, 82(3), 204–213.
  • Kalmus, V. (2004). What do pupils and textbooks do with each other? Methodological problems of research on socialization through educational media. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 469–485.
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kumar, N. (1989). The Indian textbook industry. In J. P. Farrell & S. P. Heyneman (Eds.), Textbooks in the developing world: Economic and educational choices (pp. 130–136). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Larrick, N. (1954). Try it on for fit. Library Journal, 79(8), 729–733.
  • Larrick, N. (1965). The all-white world of children’s books. Saturday Review, 48(7), 63–65, 84–85.
  • Lee, K. (2018). Developmental milestones for a nine-year-old. Retrieved from https://www.verywellfamily.com/child-development-nine-year-old-620731
  • Liu, Y. (2005). The construction of cultural values and beliefs in Chinese language textbooks: A critical discourse analysis. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(1), 15–30.
  • Lorimer, R., & Keeney, P. (1989). Defining the curriculum: The role of the multinational textbook in Canada. In S. deCastell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority, and criticism: Readings on the school textbook (pp. 170–183). London, UK: Falmer Press.
  • Lu, L. M. (2014). Power relations in creating and distributing official knowledge in children’s literature: Historical picture of Taiwan. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(5), 620–648.
  • Luke, A. (1991). The secular world: Catholic reconstructions of Dick and Jane. In M. W. Apple & L. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 166–190). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Luke, C., deCastell, S., & Luke, A. (1989). Beyond criticism: The authority of the school textbook. In S. deCastell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority, and criticism: Readings on the school textbook (pp. 245–260). London, UK: Falmer Press.
  • MacLeod, J. (2009). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspiration and attainment in a low-income neighborhood (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • May, W., Lantz, T., & Rohr, S. (1990, April). “Whose” content, context, and culture in elementary art and music textbooks? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston, MA.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1955). Some consequences of achievement motivation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: D. van Nostrand.
  • Mehliger, H. D. (1991). American textbook reform: What can we learn from the Soviet experience? In P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, & L. Weis (Eds.), Textbook in American society (pp. 145–160). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Metametrics (2017). Lexile-to-Grade Correspondence. Retrieved at http://www.lexile.com/about-lexile/grade-equivalent/grade-equivalentchart/
  • Murphy, S. (1991). Authorship and discourse types in Canadian basal reading programs. Reflections on Canadian Literacy, 9(3–4), 133–138.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of the Chief State School Officers (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf
  • Nelson, J., Perfetti, C., Liben, D., & Liben, M. (2011). Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade level and student performance. New York, NY: Student Achievement Partners.
  • Neumann, P. H. (1989). Publishing for schools in the Federal Republic of Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In J. P. Farrell & S. P. Heyneman (Eds.), Textbooks in the developing world: Economic and educational choices (pp. 115–129). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Neumann, P. H., & Cunningham, M. A. (1982). Mexico’s free textbooks: Nationalism and the urgency to education. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., Smith, M. L., Guilbert, S. M., Stange, D. M., Baker, J. J., & Weber, A. C. (2008). Learning to read scientific text: Do elementary school commercial reading programs help? Science Education, 92(5), 765–798.
  • Parsons, L. T. (2013). An examination of fourth graders’ aesthetic engagement with literary characters. Reading Psychology, 34(1), 1–25.
  • Pearson, P. D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2013). The state of the field: Qualitative analyses of text complexity. Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject, Inc.
  • Pennell, C. (2014). In the age of analytic reading: Understanding readers’ engagement with text. The Reading Teacher, 68(4), 251–260.
  • Reading First Advisory Committee (2008). Response to the Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/statement.pdf
  • Resnick, R. M. (2014). The current role of the core reading textbook. Retrieved from https://www.simbainformation.com/Content/Blog/2014/02/12/The-Current-Role-Of-The-Core-Reading-Textbook
  • Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • S & P Global-Who we-are (2016). Retrieved from https://www.spglobal.com/who-we-are/our-company
  • Shkedi, A. (2009). From curriculum guide to classroom practice: Teachers’ narratives of curriculum application. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(6), 833–854.
  • Shorish, M. M. (1988). Textbooks in revolutionary Iran. In P. G. Altbach & G. P. Kelly (Eds.), Textbooks in the Third World: Policy, content, and context (pp. 247–268). New York, NY: Garland.
  • Sipe, L. R. (1999). Children’s response to literature: Author, text, reader, context. Theory into Practice, 38(3), 120–129.
  • Spiegel, D. L. (1998). Reader response approaches and the growth of readers. Language Arts, 76(1), 41–48.
  • State of the K-12 market: Executive summary. (2015). Retrieved from www.ednetinsight.com/files/StateofK12Market2015_ExecSummary.pdf
  • Taxel, J. (1981). The outsiders of the American Revolution: The selective tradition in children’s fiction. Interchange, 12(2–3), 206–228.
  • Taylor, F. (2003). Content analysis and gender stereotypes in children’s books. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 300–311.
  • Treptoe, M. A., Burns, M. K., & McComas, J. J. (2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effect on students’ reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 159–166.
  • Tyson-Bernstein, H. (1988). A conspiracy of good intentions: America’s textbook fiasco. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
  • U.S. Department of Education (2017). Reading First state data profiles: Office of elementary and secondary education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/state-data/grantee-profiles.pdf
  • Unsworth, L., & Chan, E. (2009). Bridging multimodal literacies and national assessment programs in literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32(3), 245–257.
  • Wexler, P. (1982). Structure, text, and subject: A critical sociology of school knowledge. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Cultural and economic reproduction in education: Essays on class, ideology, and the State (pp. 275–303). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45.
  • Wilson, B. (2016). The extraordinary 9-year old. In D. C. Ray (Ed.), A therapist’s guide to child development: The extraordinary normal years (pp. 123–135). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wolf, W., King, M. C., & Huck, C. S. (1968). Teaching critical reading to elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(4), 435–498.
  • Wood, C. (2007). Yardsticks: Children in the classroom, ages 4–14 (3rd ed.). Turners Falls, MA: Center for Responsive Schools.
  • Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2017). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities. doi:10.1177/0022219416688170

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.