1,443
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher adaptation of document-based history curricula: results of the Reading Like a Historian curriculum-use survey

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Avery, P. G., & Simmons, A. M. (2001). Civic life as conveyed in United States civics and history textbooks. International Journal of Social Education, 15(2), 105–130.
  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—Or might be—The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.
  • Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.
  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1975). The concept of curriculum potential. Curriculum Theory Network, 5(2), 151–159.
  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Brown, M., & Edelson, D. C. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? (Design Brief). Evanston, IL: Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.
  • Calderon, D. (2014). Speaking back to manifest destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 24–36.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363–401). New York: Macmillan Publishers.
  • Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). Retrieved June 3, 2018.
  • Connelly, F. M. (1972). The functions of curriculum development. Interchange, 3(2–3), 161–177.
  • Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
  • Deng, Z. (2011). Revisiting curriculum potential. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(5), 538–559.
  • DeWitt, S. W., Patterson, N., Blankenship, W., Blevins, B., DiCamillo, L., Gerwin, D., … Saye, J. (2013). The lower-order expectations of high-stakes tests: A four-state analysis of social studies standards and test alignment. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(3), 382–427.
  • Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.
  • Evans, R. W. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children? New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Feistritzer, E. C. (2011). Profile of teachers in the United States. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
  • Fogo, B. (2015). The making of California’s history-social science standards: Enduring decisions and unresolved issues. The History Teacher, 48(4), 737–775.
  • Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403–421.
  • Harris, R., & Graham, S. (2018). Engaging with curriculum reform: Insights from English history teachers’ willingness to support curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–19.
  • Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. Research paper. MET Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
  • Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500.
  • Leming, J. S. (1991). Teacher characteristics and social studies education. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 222–236). New York: MacMillan Publishers.
  • Marino, M. P. (2011). High school world history textbooks: an analysis of content focus and chronological approaches. The History Teacher, 44(3), 421–446.
  • Milner, H. R., IV. (2013). Scripted and narrowed curriculum reform in urban schools. Urban Education, 48(2), 163–170.
  • Monte-Sano, C., De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2014). Implementing a disciplinary-literacy curriculum for US history: Learning from expert middle school teachers in diverse classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 540–575.
  • Nash, G. B., Crabtree, C. A., & Dunn, R. E. (2000). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: Vintage.
  • Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492.
  • O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84.
  • Ormond, B. M. (2016). Curriculum decisions: The challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5), 599–619.
  • Reisman, A. (2012a). Reading Like a Historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112.
  • Reisman, A. (2012b). The ‘document-based lesson’: Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233–264.
  • Reisman, A., & Fogo, B. (2016). Contributions of educative document-based curricular materials to quality of historical instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 191–202.
  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
  • Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
  • Ross, E. W. (Ed.). (2014). Social studies curriculum: The purposes, problems, and possibilities. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501–522.
  • Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
  • Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., & Johnson, T. S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34(3), 187–213.
  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–370). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.
  • Taie, S., & Goldring, R. (2017). Characteristics of public elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2015–16 National Teacher and Principal Survey first look (NCES 2017-072). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017070
  • Wineburg, S., & Martin, D. (2009). Tampering with history: Adapting primary sources for struggling readers. Social Education, 73(5), 212–216.
  • Wiswall, M. (2013). The dynamics of teacher quality. Journal of Public Economics, 100, 61–78.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.