Curriculum change in Australia and Ireland: a comparative study of recent reforms

References

• Alexander, R. (2010). The perils of policy: Success, amnesia and collateral damage in systemic educational reform. March: University of Melbourne. Dean’s Lecture Series, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2008). Globalisation and curriculum. In M. Connolly (Ed.), The sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 282–305). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland. (2013). Press release Tuesday 29 October: ASTI responds to junior cycle reform proposals. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Secondary Teachers in Ireland. (2015). Teachers’ Voice: Report of ASTI Consultation with Teachers on the Junior Cycle Reform Document “A Framework for Junior Cycle”. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Atweh, B., & Singh, P. (2011). The Australian curriculum: Continuing the national conversation. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority. (2012). Curriculum development process, Version 6. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). The SHape of the Australian Curriculum. Version 4.0. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). Revised DRAft Australian curriculum: Work studies, years 9-10. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). Draft changes to Australian Curriculum F-10 Consultation report. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2014). Review of the Australian curriculum: Final report. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2018). Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2013a). Knowledge, judgement and the curriculum: On the past, present and future of the idea of the Practical. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 684–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2013b). Responsive or responsible? Democratic education for the Global Networked Society. Policy Futures in Education, 11(6), 734–745.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. (2011). National Curriculum: A Political-Educational Tangle. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 259–280. doi: 10.1177/0004944111055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassinader, N. (2016). Transnationalism in the Australian Curriculum: New horizons or destinations of the past? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 327–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolahan, J. (2018). Irish education: History and structure. Dublin: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Coolahan, J. E. (1994) Report on the National Education Convention. Dublin: Convention Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in Context. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. E. (1990). The Changing curriculum, perspectives on the junior certificate. Dublin: O’Brien Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (2001). Constructing a Long spoon for comparative education: Charting the career of the ‘New Zealand model’. Comparative Education, 37(4), 493–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (2010). Globalization and curriculum. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 312–317). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills [DES]. (2012). A framework for junior cycle. Dublin: DES.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills [DES]. (2015). Framework for junior cycle. Dublin: DES.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills [DES]. (2016). Strategy statement and action plan for education (2016-2019). Dublin: DES.
   Google Scholar
• Ditchburn, G. M. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Finding the hidden narrative? Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, K. (2007). Australia’s adoption of outcomes based education: A critique. Issues in Educational Research, 17(2), 183–206.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (2000). Lisbon European Council: Presidency conclusions. Press release, European Council, 24 March.
   Google Scholar
• Ferriter, D. (2015, April 4). Failure to reverse Junior Cert history plan is inexcusable. Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• Ferriter, D. (2018, May 5). President is right – History should be core Junior Cert subject. Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T., & Knipe, S. (2016). Policy reform: Testing times for teacher education in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(4), 358–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, T. (2001). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J., & Farrell, L. (2014). Remaking the professional teacher: Authority and curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 634–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J. (2010). Curriculum in context: Partnership, power and praxis in Ireland. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J. (2012). The professional knowledge base and practice of Irishpost-primary teachers: What is the research evidence telling us? Irish Educational Studies, 31(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J., & Donnabháin, Ó. D. (2009). Strategic planning and accountability in Irish education. Irish Educational Studies, 28(1), 27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. (1990). Studying curriculum: towards a social constructionist perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(4), 299–312. doi: 10.1080/0022027900220401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. F. (2014). Context, curriculum and professional knowledge. History of Education, 43(6), 768–776. doi: 10.1080/0046760X.2014.943813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (1998). Education act. Dublin: Stationery Office
   Google Scholar
• Granville, G. (2004). Politics and partnership in curriculum planning in Ireland. Curriculum and ideology (pp. 67–100). (C. Sugrue, ed.). Dublin: Liffey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (1999). Education and globalization in Europe and East Asia: Convergent and divergent trends. Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris‐Hart, C. (2010). National curriculum and federalism: The Australian experience. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(3), 295–313.
   Google Scholar
• Helsby, G., & McCulloch, G. (1996). Teacher professionalism and curriculum control. In I. F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives. (pp. 56–74) London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, J. (2015a, May 16). History teachers criticize union stance on junior cycle subjects. Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, J. (2015b, August 28). TUI group recommends accepting junior cycle reform plan Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, A. (2011). Entry to higher education in Ireland in the twenty-first century. Dublin: Higher Education Authority and the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, T., Creese, B., & Gonzalez, A. (2015). Aligned instructional systems: Australia. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers, G. (2011). The transition year programme in Ireland: Embracing and resisting a curriculum innovation. Curriculum Journal, 22(1), 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. (1992). School-based curriculum development as a policy option for the 1990s: An Australian perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(2), 180–195.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. (1991). Educational historiographical meta-analysis: Rethinking methodology in the 1990s. Qualitative Studies in Education, 4(3), 231± 245.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. (2009). Respecting local, cultural contexts for assessment practice in an era of globalization. In E. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 77–94). United States of America, New York: Springer Publishing Company, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, R, Bonell, CP, Jones, HE, Pouliou, T, Murphy, SM, Waters, E, Komro, KA, Gibbs, LF, Magnus, D, & Campbell, R. (2014). The who health promoting school framework for improving the health and well‐being of students and their academic achievement. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews, Art. No.: CD008958 4. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008958.pub2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2008). Making Curriculum. In M. F. Connelly (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction (pp. 7–24). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2018). The Australian curriculum: A critical interrogation of why, what and where to? Curriculum Perspectives, 38, 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & McGregor, G. (2014). Two contrasting Australian Curriculum responses to globalisation: What students should learn or become. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 90–110.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, A. (2001). Curriculum as policy: Some implications of contemporary policy studies for the analysis of curriculum policy, with particular reference to post-primary curriculum policy in the Republic of Ireland. Curriculum Journal, 12(2), 149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2006). Teaching after the Market. In L. Weis, C. McCarthy, & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Ideology, curriculum, and the new sociology of education (pp. 115–144). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2010). Will the australian national curriculum up the intellectual ante in classrooms? curriculum perspectives. 30 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhail, A., Halbert, J., & O’Neill<, H. (2018). The development of assessment policy in Ireland: A story of junior cycle reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreevy, R. (2018, May 1). President voices fears about teaching of history in schools at book launch. The Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, P. (2015, April 8). Teacher threatens ‘hunger strike’ if forced to assess students. Two standing ovations for English teacher’s speech in which she says tutors are at war. The Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., & Collins, U. (1994). A new approach to in-career development for teachers in Ireland. Bournemouth: Hyde.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on  Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2018). Early career teachers in Australia: A critical policy historiography. Journal of Education Policy, 33(2), 262–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney-Simmie, G. (2014). The Neo-liberal turn in understanding teachers’ and school leaders’ work practices in curriculum innovation and change: A critical discourse analysis of a newly proposed reform policy in lower secondary education in the Republic of Ireland. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 13(3), 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (1989). Official perceptions of curriculum in Irish second-level education. In D. G. Mulcahy & D. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Irish educational policy, process and substance (pp. 77–98). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NCCA]. (2009). Leading and supporting change in schools. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NCCA]. (2010a). Innovation and identity. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NCCA]. (2010b). Key skills initiative: Phase three. Stories from the learning site. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NCCA]. (2011). Junior cycle developments: Summary of consultation findings. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NCCA]. (2018). Report of the review of the early enactment of Junior Cycle English. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment [NCCA]. (1989). A guide to the junior certificate. Dublin: NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Board of Studies (n.d.). Retrieved from http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-areas/english-year-10/english-k-10/outcomes/table-of-objectives-and-outcomes
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, C. (2017, May 15). New well-being classes will begin for first year students from September. Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D. (1992). Cultural strangers and educational change: The OECD report investment in education and Irish educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 7(5), 445–469.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Synergies for better learning. an international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/synergies-for-better-learning.htm
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (1991). Reviews of national policies for education: Ireland. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2009). creating effective teaching and learning environments: First RESUlts from TALIS. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., & Lingard, B. (2007). Globalisation, education policy and politics. In B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The routledge falmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 65–82). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polesel, J., Rice, S., & Dulfer, N. (2014). The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: A teacher perspective from Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 640–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. (2002). Global discourses and national reconstruction: The impact of globalization on curriculum policy. The Curriculum Journal, 13(1), 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Sinnema, C. (2014). Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 50–75.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Studies Authority. (2015). Year 8 English. In Australian curriculum in Queensland. Brisbane: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Teachers’ Union. (2015). QTU Policy 2015 – 2017 as adopted by Conference 2015. Booklet C: Curriculum. Milton: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T., & Jenkings, K. N. (2010). Document analysis. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 380–385). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2016). Who’s steering the ship? National curriculum reform and the re-shaping of Australian federalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 833–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C., & O’Connor, K. (2015). National agendas in global times: Curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA since the 1980s. Journal of Education Policy, 30(5), 609–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 1–16. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.779791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbeck, M. (1981). Curriculum Issues in Australia, 1970‐1990: Contexts, policies and practices. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 11, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, E. (2009). Junior Cycle Education: Insights from a longitudinal study of students. ESRI Research Bulletin, 4/1.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Teachers’ Union of Ireland. (2012). Junior cycle developments minister unwisely and prematurely departs from earlier proposals on assessment. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Teaching Council. (2016). Code of professional conduct. Maynooth: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Teodoro, A., & Estrela, E. (2010). Curriculum policy in Portugal (1995–2007): Global agendas and regional and national reconfigurations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(5), 621–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited (AITSL). (2011). Professional standards for teacher. Carlton South: Education Council.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, P. (2015). Junior cycle reform: A way forward. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/english/curriculum/f-10
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2017). Transnational curriculum standards, curriculum reforms and classroom practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, J. (2014). An education – How an outsider became in insider – And learned what really goes on in Irish government. Dublin: Penguin Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J., & Klenowski, V. (2018). Classroom assessment practices and teacher learning: An Australian perspective. In M. Hill & H. Jiang (Eds.), Teacher learning with classroom assessment: Perspectives from Asia Pacific (pp. 19–37). Singapore: Springer Varlag.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, C. (2017). Curriculum policy reform in an era of technical accountability: ‘fixing’ curriculum, teachers and students in English schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Young, M., eds. (2010). Globalisation, knowledge and curriculum. European Journal of Education, 45. Special Issue.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar