Visible and socially-just pedagogy: implications for mathematics teacher education

References

• Adler, J. (1999). The dilemma of transparency: Seeing and seeing through talk in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/749629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (2009). Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Kings College London.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/749717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., Altendorf, L., & Kent, G. (2011). Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom: When elitism, sexism and culture collide. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.595551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (1984). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H. Steiner (Ed.), Theory of mathematics education (pp. 110–119). Institut fur Didaktik der Mathematik der Universitat Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970-1990. Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.131
   Google Scholar
• Cockcroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, T. (2013). Towards a mathematics for human rights and social justice. In A. Coles, R. Barwell, T. Cotton, J. Winter, & L. Brown (Eds.), Teaching secondary mathematics as if the planet matters (pp. 73–83). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2019). ITT core content framework. DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, B. (2011). Direct instruction in mathematics: Issues for schools with high indigenous enrolments: A literature review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n5.5
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. (2013). Resisting reductionism in mathematics pedagogy. The Curriculum Journal, 24(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.828630
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. (2018). Developing mathematical fluency: Comparing exercises and rich tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9788-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootenboer, P. (2013). The praxis of mathematics teaching: Developing mathematical identities. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.759131
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Marks, R., & Brown, M. (2017). Improving mathematics in Key Stages Two and Three: Guidance report. Education Endowment Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., & Marks, R. (2009). Mathematical ‘ability’ and identity: A sociocultural perspective on assessment and selection. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & S. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 31–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2018). Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality in school mathematics. London Review of Education, 16(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, R. (2016). The elephant in the room: Equity, social class, and mathematics. In P. Ernest, B. Sriraman, & N. Ernest (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Theory, practice and reality (pp. 127–146). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, R., Gates, P., & Roper, V. (2014). Structural exclusion through school mathematics: Using Bourdieu to understand mathematics as a social practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9468-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093284
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 253–291). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K. (2015). Critical reflection as a framework for transformative learning in teacher education. Educational Review, 67(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.839546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, S. T. (2004). Decoding mathematics instruction: A critical examination of an invisible pedagogy. In J. Muller, B. Davies, & A. Morais (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein (pp. 91–122). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2009a). Questioning the mathematics curriculum: A discursive approach. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 97–106). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2009b). Understanding practices in mathematics education: Structure and text. In Marianna Tzekaki, Maria Kaldrimidou, & Haralambos Sakonidis (Eds.), Psychology of mathematics education (pp. 49–64). International group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education - in search for theories in mathematics education: PME 33, Thessaloniki, Greece, July 19-24, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is mathematics T.I.R.E.D.? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920301852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OFSTED. (2012). Mathematics: Made to measure. The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, B. (2014). Using the construct of the Didactic contract to understand student transition into university mathematics education. Policy Futures in Education, 12(5), 646–657. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.5.646
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. (2012). Problematizing the didactic triangle. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0395-0
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1972). The psychology of learning mathematics. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (2011). An invitation to critical mathematics education. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Lee, V., & Newmann, F. (2001). Intruction and achievement in Chicago schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving – What do we mean by collaborative metacognition? Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straehler-Pohl, H., & Gellert, U. (2013). Towards a Bernsteinian language of description for mathematics classroom discourse. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.714250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, M. (2006). Collaborative learning in mathematics: A challenge to our beliefs and practices. National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
   Google Scholar
• Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 5–23). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vorholter, K. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive group strategies for modelling. ZDM, 51(4), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01055-7
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Choudhury, S. (2016). Mathematics capital in the educational field: Beyond Bourdieu. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1141113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. (2016). Social justice in the mathematics classroom. London Review of Education, 14(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.14.2.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. (2017). Critical relationships between teachers and learners of school mathematics. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1285345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. (2019). Visible pedagogy and challenging inequity is school mathematics. Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 11). Utrecht: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P., Fejzo, A., & Carvalho, T. (2020). Challenging inequity in mathematics education by making pedagogy more visible to learners. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1775320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar