Tracing the moving ‘target’ in Didaktik of vocational classroom instruction

References

• Allais, S. (2014). Selling out education: National qualifications frameworks and the neglect of knowledge. Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Allais, S., & Shalem, Y. (2018a). Introduction. In S. Allais & Y. Shalem (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum, and preparation for work (pp. 1–12). Brill/Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Allais, S., & Shalem, Y. (2018b). When is vocational education educationally valuable? In S. Allais & Y. Shalem (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum, and preparation for work (pp. 13–29). Brill/Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Anttila, P., Kukkonen, P., Lempinen, P., Nordman-Byskata, C., Pesonen, K., Tuomainen, S., & Räisänen, A. (2010). We have evidence. How vocational skills demonstrations have been implemented in practice. Summary. The Finnish Education Evaluation Council. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/37809/1/978-951-39-3904-5_nro_48.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bagnall, R. G., & Hodge, S. (2018). Contemporary adult and lifelong education and learning: An epistemological analysis. In M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller, & P. Jarvis (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning (pp. 13–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bathmaker, A. M. (2013). Defining ‘knowledge’ in vocational education qualifications in England: An analysis of key stakeholders and their constructions of knowledge, purposes and content. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2012.755210
   Google Scholar
• Berg, G. (2018). Skolans statliga uppdrag [School’s national mission]. Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige, 23(5), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.15626/pfs23.5.03
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000[1996]). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rev Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlinger, S. (2012). Qualifications frameworks and learning outcomes: Challenges for Europe’s lifelong learning area. Journal of Education and Work, 25(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.687571
   Google Scholar
• Broady, D. (1983). Samband mellan arbetsliv och utbildning. Några aktuella vägar för forskningen. [Connection between worklife and education. Some current avenues for research]. In: Kan utbildning förändra arbetslivet? Stockholm: TCO, 113–178.
   Google Scholar
• Eklöf, A. (2013). A long and winding path: Requirements for critical thinking in project work. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklöf, A., Kullenberg, T., & Nilsson, L.-E. (2017). “It is great she is really checking she wants us to pass”: Facilitating student project work. In: Education in the crossroads of economy and politics: Role of research in the advancement of public good: Book of abstracts. Paper presented at 17th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, EARLI, Finland, Tampere. Tampere: University of Tampere
   Google Scholar
• Gerrevall, P., & Håkansson, J. (2005). Projektarbetet 100 poäng – Det första året [Project work 100 credits – The first year]. Pedagogisk kommunikation 5, Institutionen för pedagogik, Växjöuniversitet.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill 2008/09:199. Högre krav och kvalitet i den nya gymnasieskolan. [Higher demands and quality in the new upper secondary school]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Guile, D., & Unwin, L. (2019a). Introduction to the handbook. In D. Guile & L. Unwin (Eds..), The Wiley handbook of vocational education and training (pp. 1–16). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119098713.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Guile, D., & Unwin, L. (2019b). VET, expertise, and work. In D. Guile & L. Unwin (Eds..), The Wiley handbook of vocational education and training (pp. 17–40). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119098713.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Gy 2000:20. Projektarbete – Kursplan, betygskriterier och kommentarer [Project work – Syllabus, assessment criteria and commentary]. Skolverket 2001. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B., & Meyer, M. A. (2011). Introduction: Finding common ground beyond fragmentation. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 9–28). Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Janík, T., Slavík, J., Najvar, P., & Janíková, M. (2019). Shedding the content: Semantics of teaching burdened by didactic formalisms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1552719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, C. H., Olsen, O. J., & Persson Thunqvist, D. (Eds.). (2018). Vocational education in the Nordic countries: Learning from diversity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliedahl, J. (2015). The recontextualisation of knowledge: Towards a social realist approach to curriculum and didactics. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, (2015(1), 27008. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27008
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Maton, K. (2017). Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory on education: Rethinking field and knowledge structure. Onomázein: Revista De Lingüística, Filología Y Traducción De La Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, 1, 12–45. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.02
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K., & Howard, S. K. (2018). Taking autonomy tours: A key to integrative knowledge-building, LCT Centre Occasional Paper 1 ( June): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K., & Moore, R. (2010). Coalitions of the mind. In K. Maton & R. Moore (Eds.), Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education (pp. 1–13). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, M. (2019). Foundations of competence-based vocational education and training. In S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, R. Stuart (Eds.), Handbook of vocational education and training: Developments in the changing world of work (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_65-2
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). Qualifications systems. Bridges to lifelong learning.
   Google Scholar
• Österlind, E. (2008). Gymnasieskolans projektarbete ur elevperspektiv [Upper secondary project work from a student perspective]. Stockholms universitets förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Riquarts, K., & Hopmann, S. (1995). Starting a dialogue: Issues in a beginning conversation between Didaktik and the curriculum traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027950270102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay, S., & Steyn, D. (2016). Enabling knowledge progression in vocational curricula: Design as a case study. In K. Maton, S. Hood, & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in legitimation code theory (pp. 138–157). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skolinspektionen. (2017). Helhet i utbildningen på gymnasiets yrkesprogram [Holistic perspective on upper secondary vocational programmes].
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011). Curriculum for the upper secondary school. Statens skolverk. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2975
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2012). Upper secondary school 2011-An overall commentary, diploma goals and programme structures. Statens skolverk. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2801
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (11 January 2019). Introduktion till gymnasiearbetet för yrkesprogram [Introduction to the diploma project in upper secondary vocational programmes]. Statens skolverk. Accessed 2019, February 26, from https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/gymnasieskolan/laroplan-program-och-amnen-i-gymnasieskolan/gymnasiearbetet
   Google Scholar
• Svärdemo Åberg, E., Calissendorff, M., & Ståhle, Y. (2018). Förberedd för högskolestudier?: En studie av hur” vetenskapligt grundat arbetssätt” tar skriftspråklig form i svenska gymnasiearbeten inom samhällsvetenskapsprogrammet [Ready for higher education?: A study of how “scientifically based work methods” are expressed in writing in Swedish diploma projects in the social science programme]. Utbildning Och Lärande/Education and Learning, 12(2), 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum? In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. (2019). Knowledge, competence, and vocational education. In D. Guile & L. Unwin (Eds..), The Wiley handbook of vocational education and training (pp. 97–112). Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119098713.ch6
   Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.1002112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyszynska Johansson, M. (2018). Student experience of vocational becoming in upper secondary vocational education and training: Navigating by feedback. [Doctoral thesis]. Göteborgs universitet. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/56755
   Google Scholar