References
- Alviar-Martin, T., & Baildon, M. (2016). Context and curriculum in two global cities: A study of discourses of citizenship in hong kong and singapore. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(58), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2140
- Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Houghton Mifflin.
- Central News Agency (2015). Ke-gang wei-tiao zheng-yi zhe-xie yun-ti ni bu nen bu zhi (You should understand this curriculum revision controversy). http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201507245020-2.aspx
- Connelly, F. M. (1972). The functions of curriculum development. Interchange, 3(2–3), 161–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137642
- Delanty, G. (2000). Citizenship in a global age: Society, culture, politics. Issues in society. Open University Press.
- Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. University of Chicago Press.
- Elliott, J., & Norris, N. (2012). Curriculum, pedagogy and educational research: The work of Lawrence Stenhouse. Routledge.
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
- Faulks, K. (1998). Citizenship in modern Britain. Edinburgh Univ Press.
- Gellner, E. (1988). Nations and nationalism. Basil Blackwell.
- Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720601133405
- Grant, S. G., Swan, K., & Lee, J. (2017). Inquiry-Based Practice in Social Studies Education: Understanding the Inquiry Design Model. Routledge.
- Herczog, M. M. (2013). The links between the C3 Framework and the NCSS National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies. Social Education, 77(6), 331–333. https://www.socialstudies.org/system/files/publications/articles/se_7706331.pdf
- Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1992). Amid behavioural and behaviouristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler Rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(6), 533–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027920240602
- Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1995). Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027950270108
- Hung, C. Y. (2015). From regime change to paradigm shift: A philosophical perspective on the development of Taiwan’s citizenship curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 65–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.07.008
- Hung, C. Y. (2018). Educators as transformative intellectuals: Taiwanese teacher activism during the national curriculum controversy. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2018.1435973
- Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Rinehart & Winston.
- James, M. (2012). An alternative of the objectives model: The process model for the design and development of the curriculum. In J. Elliott & N. Norris (Eds.), Curriculum, Pedagogy and Educational Research: The work of Lawrence Stenhouse (pp. 61–83). Routledge.
- Kliebard, H. M. (1971). Bureaucracy and curriculum theory. In Freedom, bureaucracy and schooling. V. F. Haubrich (ed.). Washington: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 74–93).
- Macdonald, J. B. (1975). Curriculum and human interests. In F. W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 283–294). McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
- Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press.
- McKernan, J. (2008). Curriculum and imagination: Process theory, pedagogy and action research. Routledge.
- McLaughlin, T. (1992). Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 21(3), 235–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724920210307
- Mills, S. (1997). Discourse: The new critical idiom. Routledge.
- Peters, R. S. (2007). Education as initiation. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), Philosophical analysis and education, 87-111. Humanities Press.
- Peters, R. S., Woods, J., & Dray, W. H. (1973). Aims of education: A conceptual inquiry. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 11–57). Oxford Unviersity Press.
- Pinar, W. F. (1978). The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027780100303
- Pinar, W. F. (2017). The curriculum studies reader (5th edition). In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (pp. 167–175). Routledge.
- Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (Vol. 17). Peter Lang.
- Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. Prentice Hall, Inc.
- Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., & Friedman, T. (2016). Becoming citizens in a changing world. Amsterdam.
- Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/442881
- Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/443100
- Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann.
- Taipei Times. (2015). Students launch new movement. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2015/08/02/2003624443
- Taiwan Ministry of Education. (1956). Zhong-Xue Ke-Cheng Biao-Zhun (High School Curriculum Standards). TMOE.
- Taiwan Ministry of Education. (1983). Gao-Ji Zhong-Xue Ke-Cheng Biao-Zhun (Senior High School Curriculum Standards). TMOE.
- Taiwan Ministry of Education. (2009). Pu-Tong Gao-Ji Zhong-Xue Gong-Min yu She-Hui Ke Ke-Cheng Gang-Yao Bu-Chong Shuo-Min (The Supplementary Illustration of the Senior High School Civics and Society Curriculum). TMOE.
- Taiwan Ministry of Education. (2018). 12-Nian Guo-Min Ji-Ben Jiao-Yu Ke-Cheng Gang-Yao - She-Hui Ling-Yu (12-year basic education curricula - social studies domain). TMOE.
- Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.