Advancing citizenship through language arts education: conceptions of rhetoric in Scandinavian national curricula

References

• Andrews, R. (2019). The importance of rhetoric and argumentation in schools. Education & Democracy, 28(2, special issue), 77–92. https://www.oru.se/globalassets/oru-sv/forskning/forskningsmiljoer/hs/humus/utbildning-och-demokrati/2019/nr-2/richard-andrews---the-importance-of-rhetoric-and-argumentation-to-schools-in-england.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachen ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2018). The art of rhetoric (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwill, J. M. (1998). Rhetoric reclaimed, Aristotle and the liberal arts tradition. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken, J. (2019). The integration of rhetoric into existing school subjects. Utbildning & Demokrati, 28(2), 93–108. www.oru.se/globalassets/oru-sv/forskning/forskningsmiljoer/hs/humus/utbildning-och-demokrati/2019/nr-2/jonas-bakken—the-integration-of-rhetoric-into-existing-school-subjects.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. B. (1991). Isocrates and Plato on rhetoric and rhetorical education. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 21(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02773949109390909
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2005). Skriving som grunnleggende ferdighet og som nasjonal prøve – ideologi og strategier. In A. J. Aasen & S. Nome (Eds.), Det nye norskfaget (pp. 161–188). Fagbokforlaget
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2012). Becoming world-wise: An educational perspective on the rhetorical curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(6,Special Issue), 815–826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.730285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Børne- og undervisningsministeriet. (2017). Dansk A – Stx August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Børne- og undervisningsministeriet. (2019). Dansk Fælles Mål.
   Google Scholar
• Brummett, B. (2012). Taking a metaperspective on rhetorical education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(6,Special Issue), 809–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.730284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicero, M. T. (1967). De oratore (Reprint.). Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, R. (2013). How rhetorical theories of genre address common core writing standards. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(3), 215‒222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick, N. (2014). Rhetoric and Dewey’s experimental pedagogy. In B. Jackson & G. Clark (Eds.), Trained capacities: John Dewey, rhetoric, and democratic practice (Vol. 2014, pp. 177–192). University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education, an introduction to the philosophy of education. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. (1998). Rhetoric as a course study. College English, 61(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkeskoleloven. (2017). LBK nr 1396 af 28/ 09/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins, E. V. (2004). Logos and power in Isocrates and Aristotle. University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. (2004). Teaching rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 34(3), 39–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940409391289
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, D. L. (2016). The paramount importance of experience and situations in Dewey’s democracy and education. Educational Theory, 66(1–2), 73–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, C. (2019). Theme introduction. Utbildning & Demokrati, 28(2), 5–15. https://www.oru.se/globalassets/oru-sv/forskning/forskningsmiljoer/hs/humus/utbildning-och-demokrati/2019/nr-2/claire-milne-hogarth---theme-introduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isocrates. (1929a). Against the sophists. In G. Norlin (Ed.), Isoctrates: Vol. II (pp. 159–177). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isocrates. (1929b). Antidosis. In G. Norlin (Ed.), Isocrates: Vol. II (pp. 179–365). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, T. J., & Miller, T. (2005). Civic humanism, a postmortem?. In R. Graff, A. E. Walzer, & J. M. Atwill (Eds.), The viability of rhetorical tradition (pp. 141–157). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, C. (2016). Student-driven imitation as a means to strengthening rhetorical agency—or, propelling Quintilian’s chapter on imitation into today’s teaching. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 19(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2016.1186579
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67–78). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2012). A short history of writing instruction, from ancient Greece to modern America. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Opplæringslova. (1998). Lov om grunnskolen og den vidaregåande opplæringa (LOV-1998-07-17-61). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1998-07-17-61
   Google Scholar
• Quintilian. (1998). Institutio oratoria (H. E. Butler, Trans.; Vols. 1–1–4). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rives, A., & Olsen, A. W. (2015). Where’s the rhetoric? Exposing the (mis)alignment in the common core state writing standards. Journal Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, K., & Soetaert, R. (2012). Revisiting the rhetorical curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(6), 723‒725. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.730280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS. (2010). Skollag. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011a) . Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011b) . Kommentarmaterial till ämnesplan i svenska.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2011c) . Ämnesplan i svenska.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2019) . Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet.
   Google Scholar
• Terrill, R. (2011). Mimesis, duality, and rhetorical education. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 41(4), 295–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2011.553765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2019). Læreplan i norsk. (NOR01-06). https://www.udir.no/lk20/nor01-06
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (2011). The genuine teachers of this art, rhetorical education in antiquity. University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, A. E. (2005). Teaching ‘political wisdom’ Isocrates and the tradition of Dissoi Logoi. In R. Graff, A. E. Walzer, & J. M. Atwill (Eds.), The viability of the rhetorical tradition (pp. 113–124). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zappen, J. P. (2012). US and Russian traditions in rhetoric, education and culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(6), 745‒760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.730281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar