Reframing curriculum for religious education

References

• Alberts, W. (2007). Integrative religious education in Europe. Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110971347
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, W. (2017). Reconstruction, Critical Accommodation or Business as Usual? Challenges of Criticisms of the World Religions Paradigm to the Design of Teaching Programmes in the Study of Religions. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 29(4–5), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, K. H. (2012). Didactics, didactic models and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 986–990). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1833
   Google Scholar
• Autio, T. (2014). The internationalization of curriculum research. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 17–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. P. (2021). The commission on religious education, worldviews and the future of religious education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 70(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2021.1871590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. P. (2023). Religion and worldviews: The triumph of the secular in religious education. Ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003264439
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. (2019). Crisis, Controversy and the Future of Religious Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., Aldridge, D., Hannam, P., & Whittle, S. (2019) Religious Literacy: A way forward for Religious Education? A Report Submitted to the Culham St Gabriel’s Trust. https://www.reonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Religious-Literacy-Biesta-Aldridge-Hannam-Whittle-June-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Hannam, P. (2021). Introduction. In H. Biesta (Ed.), Religion and education: The forgotten dimensions of religious education (pp. 1–7). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. and Hannam, P. (Eds.), (2021). Introduction. Religion and Education: The Forgotten Dimensions of Religious Education (pp. 1-7). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Big Ideas for RE. (2022) ‘What are Big Ideas for RE?’ https://bigideasforre.org/what-are-big-ideas-for-re/
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, M., & Chater, M. (Eds.), (2018). We Need to Talk about Religious Education: Manifestos for the Future of RE. Jessica Kingsley Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, M. (Ed). (2020). Reforming religious education: Power and knowledge in a worldviews curriculum. John Catt Educational Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallard, Y., & Bosch, M. (2014). Didactic transposition in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 170–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_48
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, N. (2013). The introductory course: less is better. In C. I. Lehrich & I. Lehrich (Eds.), On teaching religion: Essays by Jonathan Z. Smith (pp. 11–19). Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, J. C., Lundie, D., Davis, R. A., Baumfield, V., Barnes, L. P., Gallagher, T., Lowden, K., Bourque, N., & Wenell, K. J. (2013). Does religious education work?: A multi-dimensional investigation. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cooling, T. (2020). Worldview in religious education: Autobiographical reflections on the commission on religious education in England final report. British Journal of Religious Education, 42(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1764497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoRE. (2018). Commission on religious education final report. Religion and worldviews: The way forward. A National Plan for RE. https://www.commissiononre.org.uk/final-report-religion-and-worldviews-the-way-forward-a-national-plan-for-re/
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, C., & Robinson, D. (Eds.), (2016). After Worlds Religions, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015). Content, Joseph Schwab and German Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1090628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2020). Knowledge, Content, Curriculum and Didaktik: Beyond Social Realism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2021, December). Powerful knowledge, transformations and Didaktik/curriculum thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 47(6), 1652–1674. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, S. (2011). The only freedom i can see: Imprisoned queer writing and the politics of the unimaginable. In Smith & Stanley (Eds.), Captive genders: Transembodiment and prison industrial complex (pp. 169–184). AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. (2008). Meditaciones anti-cartesianas: sobre el origen del anti-discurso filosófico de la modernidad. Tabula Rasa, 9(9), 153–198. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.344
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. (2022). The ‘essential’ guide to big ideas for RE. https://bigideasforre.org/the-essential-guide-to-big-ideas-for-re/
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R., & Freathy, G. (2013). RE-searchers: A dialogic approach to RE in primary schools‘. Resource, 36, 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/13501
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. (2018). Continuing the dialogue: Curriculum, didaktik and theories of knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1537377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, N., & Kenklies, K. (2022). Continental pedagogy & curriculum. In R. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education ((4th ed., pp. 245–255). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.03028-1
   Google Scholar
• Führding, S. (2017) Method and theory in the study of religion: Working Papers from Hannover
   Google Scholar
• Gafney, W. (2017). Womanist Midrash: A reintroduction to the women of the Torah and the throne. Presbyterian Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G., Seymour, O., & Wright, K. (2019) Religion and worldviews in a broad and balanced curriculum: A practical tool https://www.reonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/RE-in-a-Balanced-Curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G., & Wright, K. (2018). Re–dressing the balance. In Castelli, M. & Chater, M. (Eds), We need to talk about religious education (pp. 101–113). Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmitt, M. (2000). Pedagogies of Religious Education. McCrimmon Publishing Co Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political-economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004
   Google Scholar
• Hlabangane, N. (2021). The underside of modern knowledge: An epistemic break from western science. In M. Steyn & W. Mpofu (Eds.), Decolonising the human: Reflections from Africa on difference and oppression (pp. 164–185). Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann S. (2015). Klafki’s model of Didakik analysis and lesson planning in Teacher Education. In Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 197–206). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horlacher, R. (2016). The educated subject and the German concept of Bildung. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814667
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2002). Holding complexity and searching for meaning: Teaching as reflective practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110086975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2003). Approaching educational research from the tradition of critical-constructive Didaktik. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360300200171
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (1997). Religious education: An interpretive approach. Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2019). 50 years on: The Shap working party on world religions in education and its publications. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 40(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2019.1575113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. (2008). RS based RE in Public Schools: A must for a secular state. Numen, 55(2–3), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852708X283023
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. (2019). ‘Jensen’s scientific approach’ to Religion education. To Religion Education CEPS Journal, 9(4), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.707
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2015). Didaktik analysis and the core of preparation of instruction. In Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–160). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kueh, R. (2020). Disciplinaryhearing: Making the case for the disciplinary in religion and worldviews. In M. Chater (Ed.), Reforming RE: Power and knowledge in a worldviews curriculum (pp. 131–147). John Catt Educational Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, D. (2019). Toward a theory of pedagogical reduction: Selection, simplification, and generalization in an age of critical education. Educational Theory, 68(4–5), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, D. (2020). Religion, reductionism and pedagogical reduction. In Gert Biesta & Patricia Hannam (Eds.), Religion and education: The forgotten dimensions of religious education (pp. 48–65). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446397_005
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, D. (2021). Reduction without reductionism: Re-imagining religious studies and religious education. Implicit Religion, 23(3), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.43225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions: Or, How European Universalism was preserved in the language of Pluralism. Chicago University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922621.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. A., & Meyer, H. (2007). Wolfgang Klafki. Eine Didaktik für das 21. Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T. (2014). Debating human rights – universal or relative to culture?, DevelopmentEducation.Ie. Available at: https://developmenteducation.ie/blog/2014/02/11/debating-human-rights-universal-or-relative-to-culture/ (Accessed: 16 June)
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2021). Research review series: Religious education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-review-series-religious-education/research-review-series-religious-education
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, K. (2022). Conceptualising religion and worldviews for the school. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003193944
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, J. L. (2015). Does religious education promote good community relations? Journal of Beliefs & Values, 36(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2015.1021125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchard, J. L., Kelly, L., & Winstanley, C. (2020). Head’ and ‘heart’ work: Re-appraising the place of theory in the ‘academic dimension’ of pre-service teacher education in England. Studia paedagogica, 25(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2020-2-7
   Google Scholar
• Phase One of the RE Review for England. (2013); https://www.natre.org.uk/uploads/Free%20Resources/2013%20Review%20of%20Religious%20Education%20in%20England.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2014). Introduction. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 17–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M., & Dinham, A. (2015). Re for Real: The future of teaching and learning about religion & belief. Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. Z. (2013). The Introductory Course: Less Is Better In I. L. Christopher (Ed.), On Teaching Religion: Essays by Jonathan Z. Smith. New York, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199944293.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Stones, A., & Fraser-Pearce, J. (2022). Epistemic literacy as an aim for religious education and implications for teacher education. In B. Hudson, C. Olin-Scheller, M. Stolare, & N. Gericke (Eds.), International perspectives on knowledge and quality: Implications for innovation in teacher education policy and practice (pp. 87–107). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350178434.0014
   Google Scholar
• Theos. (2021) ‘Nobody stands nowhere’ https://www.reonline.org.uk/news/nobody-stands-nowhere/
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D. (2008). The knowledge of science and the knowledge of the classroom: Using the Heidelberg Catechism (1563) to examine overlooked connections. In Emidio Campi, Simone De Angelis, Anja-Silvia Goeing, & Anthony Grafton (Eds.), Scholarly knowledge: Textbooks in early Modern Europe (pp. 75–85). Librarie Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M. (2005). School Didactics and Learning. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203304778
   Google Scholar
• Wagenschein, M. (2015). Teaching to Understanding in Westbury. In I. Hopmann, S., & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 161–175). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I. (2015). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might Didaktik teach curriculum? In Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2015). (Eds) Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2018). The weakness of “powerful knowledge”. London Review of Education, 16(2), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.2.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.1002112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2016). Bringing teaching back in: The Norwegian NOU The school of the future in light of the Allgemeine Didaktik theory of Wolfgang Klafki. Nordic Journal of Pedagogy & Critique, 2(0), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.17585/ntpk.v2.268
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.764505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2015, September 1). Unleashing the power of knowledge for all. Spiked. Online. www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/unleashing-the-power-of-knowledge-for-all/17374
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Revista De Educacion, 1, 229–250.
   Google Scholar