1,634
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Vygotsky’s perezhivanies with Dewey’s occupations: Improving integration of teaching and assessing via creative learning units

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 598-618 | Received 04 May 2023, Accepted 27 Jul 2023, Published online: 10 Aug 2023

References

  • Abbott-Chapman, J., Martin, K., Ollington, N., Venn, A., Dwyer, T., & Gall, S. (2014). The longitudinal association of childhood school engagement with adult educational and occupational achievement: Findings from an Australian national study. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3031
  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruickshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged Edn ed.). Addison Wesley Longman, Incorporated.
  • Au, W. (2018). A Marxist education: Learning to change the world. Haymarket Books.
  • Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
  • Biesta, G. (2019). Should teaching be re(dis)covered? Introduction to a symposium. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38(5), 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09667-y
  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. In Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company, Inc.
  • Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 14–25). Routledge.
  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 181–197). Routledge.
  • Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022
  • Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1903). Interest as related to will. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Houghton Mifflin Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/14633-000
  • Dewey, J. (1915). Splitting up the school system. New Republic, 2(April 17), 283–284.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. The Macmillan Company.
  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/14663-000
  • Dewey, J. (1937). Charles Sanders Peirce. New Republic, 89(February 3), 415–416.
  • Dewey, J. (1938a). Experience and education. Collier Books.
  • Dewey, J. (1938b). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
  • Ediger, M. (1996). Sequence and scope in the curriculum. Education, 117(1), 58–60.
  • English, N., Robertson, P., Gillis, S., & Graham, L. (2022). Rubrics and formative assessment in K-12 education: A scoping review of literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101964. Article 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964
  • Gredler, M., & Shields, C. (2004). Does no one read Vygotsky’s words? Commentary on Glassman. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002021
  • Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.007
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  • Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. State University of New York Press.
  • Higgins, C. (2005). Dewey’s conception of vocation: Existential, aesthetic, and educational implications for teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500048502
  • Huebner, D. (1967). Curriculum as concern for man’s temporality. Theory into Practice, 6(4), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405846609542083
  • Joughin, G. (2009). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education: A critical review. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 13–27). Springer Netherlands.
  • Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958 (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203339985
  • Kliebard, H. M. (2006). Dewey’s reconstruction of the curriculum. In D. T. Hansen (Ed.), John Dewey and our educational prospect (pp. 113–127). SUNY Press.
  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind Culture and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
  • Moss, J., Godinho, S. C., & Chao, E. (2019). Enacting the Australian curriculum: Primary and secondary teachers’ approaches to integrating the curriculum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n3.2
  • Nardo, A. (2021). Exploring a Vygotskian theory of education and its evolutionary foundations. Educational Theory, 71(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12485
  • Newman, S., & Latifi, A. (2021). Vygotsky, education and teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1831375
  • Nichols, S. L., & Dawson, H. S. (2012). Assessment as a context for student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 457–477). Springer US.
  • Nungesser, F. (2017). The evolution of pragmatism. European Journal of Sociology, 58(2), 327–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975617000121
  • Quay, J., Miller, L., Browning, D., & Brodie McKenzie, A. (2022). Dewey’s education through occupations as being-doing-knowing: An introduction to teacher planning with creative learning units. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(5), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2070716
  • Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
  • Reese, W. J. (2001). The origins of progressive education. History of Education Quarterly, 41(1), 1–24.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. (2016). Perezhivanie in the light of the later Vygotsky’s Spinozist turn. Mind Culture and Activity, 23(4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186197
  • Sabornie, E. J., & Espelage, D. L. (2023). Introduction to the Third Edition. in Sabornie, E. J., & Espelage, D. L., Eds. (3rd, pp. Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275312-2.
  • Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind Culture and Activity, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306
  • Stetsenko, A. (2011). Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf, & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, development and education: Cultural, historical, anthropological perspectives (pp. 25–40). Springer Netherlands.
  • Stetsenko, A. (2016). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2/3), 119–145.
  • Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.
  • Verenikina, I. (2004). From theory to practice: What does the metaphor of scaffolding mean to educators today? Outlines Critical Practice Studies, 6(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v6i2.2140
  • Veresov, N. N. (2017a). ZBR and ZPD: Is there a difference? Cultural-Historical Psychology, 13(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2017130102
  • Veresov, N. (2017b). The concept of perezhivanie in cultural-historical theory: Content and contexts. In M. Fleer, F. G. Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky’s legacy (pp. 47–70). Springer Singapore.
  • Veresov, N. (2021). Cultural-historical theory and the dialectics of lower and higher psychological functions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09647-3
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1993a). From addresses, reports, etc. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 2 – The fundamentals of defectology (J. E. Knox & C. B. Stevens, Trans.) (pp. 292–301). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1993b). The collective as a factor in the development of the abnormal child. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 2 – The fundamentals of defectology (J. E. Knox & C. B. Stevens, Trans.) (pp. 191–208). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1993c). Defectology and the study of the development and education of abnormal children. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 2 – The fundamentals of defectology (J. E. Knox & C. B. Stevens, Trans.) (pp. 164–170). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). Cultivation of higher forms of behavior. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 4 – The history of the development of higher mental functions (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 221–229). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). Development of arithmetic operations. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 4 – The history of the development of higher mental functions (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 149–152). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). Development of interests at the transitional age. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 5 – Child psychology (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 3–28). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997d). Conclusion; further research; development of personality and world view in the child. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 4 – The history of the development of higher mental functions (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 241–251). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997e). Genesis of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 4 – Child psychology (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 187–206). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998a). The problem of age. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 5 – The history of the development of higher mental functions (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 97–119). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998b). The crisis at age seven. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 5 – Child psychology (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 289–296). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1998c). Development of interests at the transitional age. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 5 – Child psychology (M. J. Hall, Trans.) (pp. 3–28). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2011). The dynamics of the schoolchild’s mental development in relation to teaching and learning (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Journal of Cognitive Education & Psychology, 10(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.10.2.198
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2019a). The subject matter of pedology. In L. S. Vygotsky’s pedological works: Volume 1 – Foundations of pedology (D. Kellogg & N. Veresov, Trans.) (pp. 1–20). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2019b). The problem of the environment in pedology. In L. S. Vygotsky’s pedological works: Volume 1 – Foundations of pedology (D. Kellogg & N. Veresov, Trans.) (pp. 65–84). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2021a). The crisis at age three and the crisis at age seven. In L. S. Vygotsky’s pedological works: Volume 2 – The problem of age (D. Kellogg & N. Veresov, Trans.) (pp. 201–227). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2021b). The structure and dynamics of age. In L. S. Vygotsky’s pedological works: Volume 2 – The problem of age (D. Kellogg & N. Veresov, Trans.) (pp. 39–46). Springer.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2021c). The crisis at seven years. In L. S. Vygotsky’s pedological works: Volume 2 – The problem of age (D. Kellogg & N. Veresov, Trans.) (pp. 229–242). Springer.
  • Woods, K., & Griffin, P. (2013). Judgement-based performance measures of literacy for students with additional needs: Seeing students through the eyes of experienced special education teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(3), 325–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.734777
  • Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260
  • Yan, Z., & Boud, D. (2022). Conceptualising assessment-as-learning. In Z. Yan & L. Yang (Eds.), Assessment as learning: Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement (pp. 11–24). Routledge.