593
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluation for equity: reclaiming evaluation by striving towards counter-hegemonic democratic practices

Pages 277-290 | Received 07 Dec 2020, Accepted 12 May 2021, Published online: 24 May 2021

References

  • Alkin, Marvin, and Christina Christie. 2004. “An Evaluation Theory Tree.” In Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences, edited by Marvin Alkin, 381–392. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bennett, Anna, Ryan Naylor, Kate Mellor, Matt Brett, Jenny Gore, Andrew Harvey, Richard James, Belinda Munn, Max Smith, and Geoff Whitty. 2015. The Critical Interventions Framework Part 2: Equity Initiatives in Australian Higher Education: A Review of Evidence of Impact.
  • Biesta, Gert. 2007. “Why “What Works” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research.” Educational Theory 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x.
  • Borrelli, Davide, Mihaela Gavrila, Emanuela Spanò, and Marialuisa Stazio. 2019. “Another University is Possible: Towards an Idea of Meridian University.” Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 11 (3): 16–39. doi:10.14658/pupj-ijse-2019-3-2.
  • Bradley, Denise, Peter Noonan, Helen Nugent, and Bill Scales. 2008. Review of Australian Higher Education, Final Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
  • Brisolara, Sharon, Denise Seigart, and Saumitra SenGupta. 2014. Feminist Evaluation and Research: Theory and Practice. New York: The Guidford Press.
  • Burke, Penny Jane. 2012. The Right to Higher Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Burke, Penny Jane. 2017. “Widening Access to Higher Education.” In Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, edited by Jung-Cheol Shin, and Pedro Teixeira, 58–64. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Burke, Penny Jane, Annette Hayton, and Jacqueline Stevenson. 2018. Evaluating Equity and Widening Participation in Higher Education, edited by Penny Jane Burke, Annette Hayton, and Jacqueline Stevenson. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
  • Burke, Penny Jane, and Yu-Ching Kuo. 2015. “Widening Participation in Higher Education: Policy Regimes and Globalizing Discourses.” In The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance, edited by Jeroen Huisman, Harry de Boer, David Dill, and Manuel Souto-Otero, 547–568. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Burke, Penny Jane, and Matt Lumb. 2018. “Researching and Evaluating Equity and Widening Participation: Praxis-Based Frameworks.” In Evaluating Equity and Widening Participation in Higher Education, edited by Penny Jane Burke, Annette Hayton, and Jacqueline Stevenson, 11–32. London: Trentham Books Limited.
  • Butler, Judith. 2011. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Campbell, Donald T. 1991. “Methods for the Experimenting Society.” American Journal of Evaluation 12 (3): 223–260. doi:10.1016/0886-1633(91)90039-Z.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
  • Connolly, Paul, Ciara Keenan, and Karolina Urbanska. 2018. “The Trials of Evidence-Based Practice in Education: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials in Education Research 1980–2016.” Educational Research 60 (3): 276–291. doi:10.1080/00131881.2018.1493353.
  • de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2015. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  • DESE. 2019. Performance-Based Funding for the Commonwealth Grant Scheme. Canberra: Department of Education, Skills and Employment. https://www.education.gov.au/performance-based-funding-commonwealth-grant-scheme.
  • DESE. 2020. Job Ready Graduate Discussion Paper. Higher Education Reform Package. Canberra: Department of Education, Skills and Employment.
  • Donaldson, Stewart I., Christina A. Christie, and Melvin M. Mark. 2009. What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Donaldson, Stewart I., and Robert Picciotto, eds. 2016. Evaluation for an Equitable Society. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Downing, Liam. 2017. “The Emerging Equity Evaluation Landscape in Higher Education.” Evaluation Journal of Australasia 17 (1): 19–29. doi:10.1177/1035719X1701700104.
  • Fetterman, David M., Liliana Rodríguez-Campos, and Ann P. Zukoski. 2017. Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches. Stanford, CA: Guilford Publications.
  • Fetterman, David M., and Abraham Wandersman, eds. 2005. Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Guilford Press.
  • Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Post socialist” Condition. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gale, Trevor, Sam Sellar, Stephen Parker, Robert Hattam, Barbara Comber, Deborah Tranter, and Dianne Bills. 2010. Interventions Early in School as a Means to Improve Higher Education Outcomes for Disadvantaged (Particularly Low SES) Students. Underdale: National Centre Student Equity in Higher Education.
  • Gibson-Graham, Julie Katherine. 2009. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: Univeristy of Minnesota Press.
  • Greene, Jennifer C. 2009. “Evidence as “Proof” and Evidence as “Inkling”.” In What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice? edited by Stewart I Donaldson, Christina A. Christie, and Melvin M. Mark, 153–167. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Haintz, Greer Lamaro, Sophie Goldingay, Renee Heckman, Tanya Ward, Rojan Afrouz, and Kelly George. 2018. “Evaluating Equity Initiatives in Higher Education: Processes and Challenges from One Australian University.” International Studies in Widening Participation 5 (1): 92–105.
  • Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Harrison, Neil, and Richard Waller. 2017. “Success and Impact in Widening Participation Policy: What Works and How Do We Know?” Higher Education Policy 30 (2 ): 141–160. doi:10.1057/s41307-016-0020-x.
  • House, Ernest R. 1993. Professional Evaluation: Social Impact and Political Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • House, Ernest, and Kenneth R. Howe. 1999. Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Kirkhart, Karen Eileen. 2016. “Equity, Privilege and Validity: Traveling Companions or Strange Bedfellows?” In Evaluation for an Equitable Society, edited by Stewart I Donaldson, Christina A. Christie, and Melvin M. Mark, 109–131. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • KPMG. 2015. Evaluation of Bridges to Higher Education Final Report. Sydney: Bridges to Higher Education.
  • Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Lumino, Rosaria, Dora Gambardella, and Emiliano Grimaldi. 2017. “The Evaluation Turn in the Higher Education System: Lessons from Italy.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 49 (2): 87–107. doi:10.1080/00220620.2017.1284767.
  • Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Mark, Melvin M. 2003. “Toward an Integrative View of the Theory and Practice of Program and Policy Evaluation.” In Evaluating Social Programs and Problems: Visions for the New Millennium, edited by Stewart I Donaldson, and Michael Scriven, 109–141. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Masalam, Hasriadi, Dip Kapoor, and Steven Jordan. 2016. “Decolonizing Participatory Action Research (PAR) in Asia.” In the Proceedings of the Asian Philosophical Association, 343–357. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
  • Mitchell, Timothy. 2008. “Rethinking Economy.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 39 (3): 1116–1121. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.022.
  • Naylor, Ryan. 2015. Understanding Evaluation for Equity Programs: A Guide to Effective Program Evaluation. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.
  • Neave, Guy. 2012. “The Evaluative State: A Formative Concept and an Overview.” In The Evaluative State, Institutional Autonomy and Re-Engineering Higher Education in Western Europe, 36–47. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230370227_3
  • O’Shea, Sarah Elizabeth, Valerie Harwood, Steven J. Howard, Ken Cliff, and Janine Delahunty. 2016. Evaluation Report 2015: Investigating the effectiveness of the In2Uni Year 12 University Preparation Program.
  • Olssen, Mark, and Michael A. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–345. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718.
  • Plumwood, Val. 2007. “A Review of Deborah Bird Rose’s Reports from a Wild Country: Ethics of Decolonisation.” Australian Humanities Review 42: 1–4.
  • Said, Edward. 1993. Culture & Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.
  • Schwandt, Thomas A. 2007. “Thoughts on Using the Notion of “Evidence” in the Controversy Over Methods Choice.” In Informing Federal Policies on Evaluation Methodology: Building the Evidence Base for Method Choice in Government Sponsored Evaluation, edited by George Julnes, and Debra Rogm, 111–127. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Smith, James A., Kim Robertson, and Fiona Shalley. 2018. Strengthening Evaluation in Indigenous Higher Education Contexts in Australia: Equity Fellowship Report. Perth: The National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.
  • Thrift, Nigel. 2004. “Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding Knowledges of Position.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22 (4): 175–190. doi:10.1068/d321t.
  • Wilkins, Peter and Jennifer de Vries. 2014. Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives. Perth: The National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.
  • Wood, Lesley, Mary McAteer, and Jack Whitehead. 2019. “How are Action Researchers Contributing to Knowledge Democracy? A Global Perspective.” Educational Action Research 27 (1): 7–21. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1531044.
  • Zacharias, Nadine. 2017. The Australian Student Equity Program and Institutional Change: Paradigm Shift or Business as Usual? Perth: The National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.