Student groups evaluating their group work and learning of critical online reading

References

• Aguerri, J., Santisteban, M., & Miró-Llinares, F. (2022). The fight against disinformation and its consequences: Measuring the impact of “Russia state-affiliated media” on Twitter. Preprint, SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/b4qxt
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2015). Benefits, costs, and challenges of collaboration for learning and memory. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000025
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 16(3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bak
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzie, A., & Montasari, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the spread of mis- and disinformation. In R. Montasari (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and national security. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06709-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 773–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9421-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Stadtler, M., & Salmerón, L. (2018). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & Britt, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed., pp. 141–166). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Wineburg, S., Rapaport, A., Carle, J., Garland, M., & Saavedra, A. (2021). Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211017495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Durik, A. (2018). Representations and processes in multiple source use. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 17–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G., Pardales, M. J., & Damico, J. S. (2001). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspectives, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading Online, 4(9), 80–90. http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/cervetti/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Coscarelli, C., Maykel, C., & Forzani, E. (2015). Investigating criteria that seventh graders use to evaluate the quality of online information. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning – a model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1) , 25–36. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.72
   Google Scholar
• Earnest, M., Williams, J., & Aagaard, E. (2017). Toward an optimal pedagogy for teamwork. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(10), 1378–1381. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzani, E. (2018). How well can students evaluate online science information? Contributions of prior knowledge, gender, socioeconomic status, and offline reading ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(4), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzani, E. (2020). A three-tiered framework for proactive critical evaluation during online inquiry. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018. International Report. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.747947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.) (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas, & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 177–201). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, E. (2023). Examining and enhancing adolescents’ critical online reading skills. University of Jyväskylä. JYU Dissertations, 663. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-9654-3
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Marttunen, M., Räikkönen, E., González-Ibáñez, R., & Leppänen, P. H. (2020). Promoting sixth graders’ credibility evaluation of web pages: An intervention study. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., & Marttunen, M. (2021). Students’ abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts: The role of internet-specific epistemic justifications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., Toom, A., & Marttunen, M. (2023). Teaching sourcing during online inquiry - adolescents with the weakest skills benefited the most. Instructional Science, 51(1), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09597-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1-2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The Internet’s growing role in life’s major moments. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2006/04/19/the-internets-growing-role-in-lifes-major-moments/
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. L., & Huber, A. A. (2008). Structuring group interaction to promote thinking and learning during small group learning in high school settings. In R. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 110–131). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Kallunki, V., Mundy, D., Romero, M., Romeu, T., & Gouseti, A. (2023). Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 11(3), e3425. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Paavola, S., & Toom, A. (2023). Investigating the characteristics of knowledge-related learning assignments in upper-secondary school. Education Sciences, 13(5), 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilomäki, L., Vasileva, T., & Stefanova, S. (2020). Promoting knowledge practices in upper secondary schools: Case studies from Finland and Bulgaria. Research Papers in Education, 35(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S. H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Communication, 62(3), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertysova, K. (2018). Artificial intelligence and disinformation: How AI changes the way disinformation is produced, disseminated, and can be countered. Security and Human Rights, 29(1–4), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02901005
   Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., & Leu, D. J. (2019). Exploring the collaborative synthesis of information during online reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., Coiro, J., & Räikkönen, E. (2019). Students’ evaluation of information during online inquiry: Working individually or in pairs. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 42(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., Toom, A., Coiro, J., Hämäläinen, E., & Sormunen, E. (2022). Designing classroom practices for teaching online inquiry: Experiences from the field. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(4), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Marttunen, M., Hautala, J., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2018). Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen, A. M., & Mertens, G. E. (2019). “I'm always kind of double-check-ing”: Exploring the information-seeking identities of expert generalists. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakkala, M., & Ilomäki, L. (2015). A case study of developing ICT-supported pedagogy through a collegial practice transfer process. Computers & Education, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, H., & Smith, A. (2019). Implementing reflective group work activities in a large chemistry lab to support collaborative learning. Education Sciences, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New Literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., Salminen, T., & Utriainen, J. (2021). Student evaluations of the credibility and argumentation of online sources. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1929052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, S., & Byrne, V. L. (2020). Who is behind this? Preparing high school students to evaluate online content. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1795956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhaw, K., Schnackenberg, H., Sclater, J., & Abrami, P. C. (2003). From co-operation to collaboration: Helping students become collaborative learners. In A. Ashman & R. Gillies (Eds.), Co-operative learning (pp. 69–86). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in “post-fact” society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217701217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2019). PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2021/frameworks/
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein, B., Reynolds, K. A., & Wry, E. (2023). PIRLS 2021 international results in reading. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.tr2103.kb5342
   Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2022). Students evaluating and corroborating digital news. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1897876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2023a). OECD future education and skills 2030. OECD learning compass 2020. A series of concept notes. https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/e2030-learning_compass_2030-concept_notes?fr=xKAE9_zU1NQ
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posetti, J., & Bontcheva, K. (2020). Disinfodemic: Deciphering COVID-19 disinformation [Policy Brief]. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/disinfodemic
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A. (2008). Explanation giving and receiving in cooperative learning groups. In R. M. Gillies, A. F. Ashman & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 222–237). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. G. (2008). The use of pre-group instruction to improve student collaboration. In Proceedings of the Delta Pi Epsilon Conference (pp. 65–69). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=651c173f8b63cf60e3162f2c06c0320c087499cc#page=65
   Google Scholar
• Sormunen, E., Tanni, M., Alamettälä, T., & Heinström, J. (2014). Students’ group work strategies in source‐based writing assignments. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford History Education Group. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Executive summary. http://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934
   Google Scholar
• Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–330. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3069349 https://doi.org/10.5465/3069349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., Lim, D., & Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2018). Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar