REFERENCES
- Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Baker, L., & Zimlin, L. (1989). Instructional effects on children's use of two levels of standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 340–346. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.340
- Bentz, J.L., & Fuchs, L.S. (1996). Improving peers' helping behavior to students with learning disabilities during mathematics peer tutoring. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 202–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511207
- Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
- Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
- Cohen, P.A., Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002237
- Connor, C., McDonald Morrison, F.J., & Petrella, J.N. (2004). Effective reading comprehension instruction: Examining child x instruction interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 682–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.682.
- Cook, W.L., & Kenny, D.A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405
- Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.D., Roehler, L.R., & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170536
- Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2007). Increasing strategic reading comprehension with peer-assisted learning activities. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 175–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001174
- Gold, A., Mokhlesgerami, J., Rühl, K., Schreblowski, S., & Souvignier, E. (2004). Wir werden Textdetektive (Lehrmaterial und Arbeitsheft) [We will become text detectives, teaching material and workbook]. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
- Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
- Greenwood, C.R. (1991). Classwide peer tutoring: Longitudinal effects on the reading, language, and mathematics achievement of at-risk students. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7, 105–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0748763910070203
- Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J.C., & Hall, R.V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.371
- Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H. … & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
- Kendeou, P., Van den Broek, P., White, M.J., & Lynch, J. (2007). Comprehension in preschool and early elementary children: Skill development and strategy interventions. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies. Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 27–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Kenny, D.A. (1996). Models of nonindependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407596132007
- Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
- Kreft, I.G. G., & DeLeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modelling. London, UK: Sage.
- Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D.A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Structural Equation Modelling, 18, 595–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
- Lenhard, W., & Schneider, W. (2006). ELFE 1–6: Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässler [ELFE 1–6: A reading comprehension test for children in grades one to six]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
- Mathes, P.G., Torgesen, J.K., & Allor, J.H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002371
- McMaster, K.L., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C.A., White, M.J., Kendeou, P., Rapp, D.N., Bohn-Gettler, K., & Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 100–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
- Mullis, I.V. S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report. Progress in international reading literacy study in primary school in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read, an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children's reading comprehension. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- O'Shea, L.J., & Sindelar, P.T. (1983). The effects of segmenting written discourse on the reading comprehension of low- and high-performance readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 458–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747380
- Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
- Paris, S.G., Cross, D.R., & Lipson, M.Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239–1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
- Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 84, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D.L., Elliot-Faust, D., & Miller, G. (1985). Children's use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can't be taught. In M. Pressley, & C.J. Brained (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 1–47). New York, NY: Springer.
- Pressley, M., Johnson, C.J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J.A., & Kurita, J.A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461599
- R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer program]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical computing. . Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
- Richter, T., Isberner, M.-B., Naumann, J., & Neeb, Y (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 415–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.764879
- Rohrbeck, C.A., Ginsburg-Block, M.D., Fantuzzo, J.W., & Miller, T.R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
- Roscoe, R.D., & Chi, M.T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920
- Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004479
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org
- Samuels, S.J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20194790
- Spörer, N., Brunstein, J.C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19, 272–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003
- Topping, K. (1987). Peer tutored paired reading: Outcome data from ten projects. Educational Psychology, 7, 133–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341870070206
- Topping, K.J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631–645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
- Topping, K.J., Peter, C., Stephen, P., & Whale, M. (2004). Cross-age peer tutoring of science in the primary school: Influence on scientific language and thinking. Educational Psychology, 24, 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000146449
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2012). International standard classification of education. ISCED 2011. . Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.15220/978-92-9189-123-8-en
- Van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards of coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R.F. Lorch, Jr., & E.J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983): Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Van Keer, H., & Vanderlinde, R. (2010). The impact of cross-age peer tutoring on third and sixth graders’ reading strategy awareness, reading strategy use, and reading comprehension. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5, 33–45. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/middle-grades-research-journal.html
- Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J.P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 291–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.73.4.291-329
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Webb, N.M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–40. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
- Webb, N.M., & Palincsar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
- Yuill, N.M., & Oakhill, J.V. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 33–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350020105/.