Do Reading Goals Make a Difference for Refutation Text Effectiveness?

References

• Aguilar, S. J., Polikoff, M. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2019). Refutation texts: A new approach to changing public misconceptions about education policy. Educational Researcher, 48(5), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19849416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Anspach, N. M., & Carlson, T. N. (2020). What to believe? Social media commentary and belief in misinformation. Political Behavior, 42(3), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9515-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2014). From covert processes to overt outcomes of refutation text reading: The interplay of science text structure and working memory capacity through eye fixations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 493–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9494-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asberger, J., Thomm, E., & Bauer, J. (2021). On predictors of misconceptions about educational topics: A case of topic specificity. PLOS One, 16(12), e0259878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, F., Diedenhofen, B., Ullrich, S., & Musch, J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2013). Metacognitive monitoring in university classes: Anticipating a graded vs. a pass-fail test affects monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 8(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9098-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensley, D. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Powell, L. A. (2014). A new measure of psychological misconceptions: Relations with academic background, critical thinking, and acceptance of paranormal and pseudoscientific claims. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette Sarrasin, J., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2019). Neuromyths and their origin among teachers in Quebec. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Ferguson, L. E. (2015). Beliefs about sources of knowledge predict motivation for learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Durik, A., & Rouet, J. F. (2022). Reading contexts, goals, and decisions: Text comprehension as a situated activity. Discourse Processes, 59(5–6), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2068345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. F. (2014). Scientific literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9274-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2020). Reducing interference from misconceptions: The role of inhibition in knowledge revision. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 782–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425–453). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruyckere, P., Kirschner, P. A., & Hulshof, C. D. (2015). Urban myths about learning and education. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deibl, I., & Zumbach, J. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about neuroscience and education—do freshmen and advanced students differ in their ability to identify myths? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 22(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725722114664
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dersch, A.-S., Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2022). Personalized refutation texts best stimulate teachers’ conceptual change about multimedia learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, M., Garaizar, P., & Vadillo, M. A. (2016). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 496. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero, M., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). An attempt to correct erroneous ideas among teacher education students: The effectiveness of refutation texts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 577738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futterleib, H., Thomm, E., & Bauer, J. (2022). The scientific impotence excuse in education—disentangling potency and pertinence assessments of educational research. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1006766
   Google Scholar
• Galesic, M. (2006). Dropouts on the web: Effects of interest and burden experienced during an online survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 22(2), 313–328.
   Google Scholar
• Grospietsch, F., & Lins, I. (2021). Review on the prevalence and persistence of neuromyths in education—where we stand and what is still needed. Frontiers in Education, 6, 665752. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-202110014837
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 116–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/747886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. D. (2016). Great myths of education and learning. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., Sullivan, K. A., & Gilmore, L. (2021). Neuromyths about learning: Future directions from a critical review of a decade of research in school education. Prospects, 52(1–2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09567-5
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Lyddy, F., & Lambe, S. (2013). Misconceptions about psychological science: A review. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J. (2001). Interaction effects in logistic regression, Quantitative applications in the social sciences (vol. 135). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A. (2023). Package ‘rstatix’ (version 0.7.2) [R package]. https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/rstatix/.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., & Van Boekel, M. (2019). Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach. Memory & Cognition, 47(1), 33–46. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). The Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Robinson, D. H., & McCrudden, M. T. (Eds.). (2019). Misinformation and fake news in education. IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51(5–6), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2018). When reality is out of focus: Can people tell whether their beliefs and judgments are correct or wrong? Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 147(5), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2009). The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902959986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2017). Reducing students’ misconceptions with refutational teaching: For long-term retention, comprehension matters. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000082
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, G., Vogel, S. E., & Grabner, R. H. (2020). Believing in neuromyths makes neither a bad nor good student‐teacher: The relationship between neuromyths and academic achievement in teacher education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassonde, K. A., Kendeou, P., & O'Brien, E. J. (2016). Refutation texts: Overcoming psychology misconceptions that are resistant to change. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000054
   Google Scholar
• Latini, N., Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Salmerón, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2011). 50 Great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T. (2006). Reading with purpose. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36(2), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2006.10850189
   Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 778–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithander, M. P., Geraci, L., Karaca, M., & Rydberg, J. (2021). Correcting neuromyths: A comparison of different types of refutations. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). How nonexperts understand conflicting information on social science issues. Journal of Media Psychology, 25(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T. (2012). Readers’ use of online discrepancy resolution strategies. Discourse Processes, 49(2), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.647618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menz, C., Spinath, B., Hendriks, F., & Seifried, E. (2024). Reducing educational psychological misconceptions: How effective are standard lectures, refutation lectures, and instruction in information evaluation strategies? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 10(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000269
   Google Scholar
• Menz, C., Spinath, B., & Seifried, E. (2020). Misconceptions die hard: Prevalence and reduction of wrong beliefs in topics from educational psychology among preservice teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00474-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. OECD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pieschl, S., Budd, J., Thomm, E., & Archer, J. (2021). Effects of raising student teachers’ metacognitive awareness of their educational psychological misconceptions. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(2), 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/147572572199622
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, A., Golke, S., & Wittwer, J. (2019). Refutation texts compensate for detrimental effects of misconceptions on comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy and support transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, A., Golke, S., & Wittwer, J. (2021). Counteracting detrimental effects of misconceptions on learning and metacomprehension accuracy: The utility of refutation texts and think sheets. Instructional Science, 49(2), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09535-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, A., Kollmer, J., Flick, L., Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2022). Refuting student teachers’ misconceptions about multimedia learning. Instructional Science, 50(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09568-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2023). Countering misinformation: Evidence, knowledge gaps, and implications of current interventions. European Psychologist, 28(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, L. (2021). Interventions to dispel neuromyths in educational settings—a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 719692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Jacobson, N. (2019). Zombie concepts in education: Why they won’t die and why you can’t kill them. In P. Kendeou, D. H. Robinson & M.T. McCrudden (Eds.), Misinformation and fake news in education (pp. 7–27). IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2008). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 377–394). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 10–26). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Södervik, I., Virtanen, V., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2015). Challenges in understanding photosynthesis in a university introductory biosciences class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9571-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterrett, D., Malato, D., Benz, J., Kantor, L., Tompson, T., Rosenstiel, T., Sonderman, J., & Loker, K. (2019). Who shared it? Deciding what news to trust on social media. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. K., & Kowalski, P. (2004). Naïve psychological science: The prevalence, strength, and sources of misconceptions. The Psychological Record, 54(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. K., & Kowalski, P. (2012). Students’ misconceptions in psychology: How you ask matters… sometimes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 62–77. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/2150.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, I., Sinatra, G. M., Muis, K. R., Danielson, R. W., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., & Chevrier, M. (2020). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomm, E., Gold, B., Betsch, T., & Bauer, J. (2021). When preservice teachers’ prior beliefs contradict evidence from educational research. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 1055–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G., & Kendeou, P. (2020). The effects of positive and negative emotional text content on knowledge revision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1326–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820913816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G., & Muis, K. R. (2015). Effects of text structure, reading goals and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(4), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). IAP.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of conceptual change (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. C., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2019). The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1653208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. (2014). Pädagogische Psychologie [Educational psychology] (12th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yeari, M., van den Broek, P., & Oudega, M. (2015). Processing and memory of central versus peripheral information as a function of reading goals: Evidence from eye-movements. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9561-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zengilowski, A., Schuetze, B. A., Nash, B. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2021). A critical review of the refutation text literature: Methodological confounds, theoretical problems, and possible solutions. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1861948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar