Testing a Model of Pretenure Faculty Members’ Teaching and Research Success: Motivation as a Mediator of Balance, Expectations, and Collegiality

References

• Aldersley, S. F. (1995). ‘Upward drift’ is alive and well: Research/doctoral model still attractive to institutions. Change, 27(5), 50–55. doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.9936448
   Google Scholar
• Amey, M. J. (1996). The institutional marketplace and faculty attrition. Thought and Action, 12, 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. (2010). Supporting faculty members across their careers. In K. J. Gillespie, D. L. Robertson, & Associates (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (pp. 363–378). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & McDaniels, M. (2007). Understanding new faculty: Background, aspirations, challenges, and growth. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 39–89). The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., & Cashin, W. E. (2012). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of research and literature (IDEA Paper No. 50). Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. Retrieved from http://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/IDEA%20Papers/IDEA%20Papers/PaperIDEA_50.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bess, J. L. (1997). Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Findstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 89–123. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2012). Research university STEM faculty members’ motivation to engage in teaching professional development: Building the choir through an appeal to extrinsic motivation and ego. Journal of Science Education Technology, 21, 558–570. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9346-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. (n.d.). About Carnegie classification. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/listings.php
   Google Scholar
• Cipriano, R. E., & Buller, J. L. (2012). Rating faculty collegiality. Change, 44(2), 45–48. doi:10.1080/00091383.2012.655219
   Google Scholar
• Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education. (2008). COACHE highlights report 2008. Cambridge, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education. (2010). The experience of tenure-track faculty at research universities: Analysis of COACHE Survey results by academic area and gender. Cambridge, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, V. M. (2007). Survey of changes in faculty retirement policies 2007. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/36818073-DDAE-4CFC-B158-41A1524D62E3/0/AAUP2007RetirementReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Self-determined teaching: Opportunities and obstacles. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively (pp. 57–71). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, P. L., & Gaston-Gayles, J. L. (2008). New faculty on the block: Issues of stress and support. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 17, 89–106. doi:10.1080/10911350802168878
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Research in Higher Education, 9, 199–242. doi:10.1007/BF00976997
   Google Scholar
• Frenet, C., Guay, F., & Senecal, C. (2004). Adjusting to job demands: The role of work self-determination and job control in predicting burnout. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 39–56. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00098-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, H. C., O’Connor, K. A., Good, A. J., Ledford, C. C., Peel, B. B., & Zhang, G. (2008). Building a support system toward tenure: Challenges and needs of tenure-track faculty in colleges of education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 16, 429–447. doi:10.1080/13611260802433791
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N. C., Perry, R. P., Chipperfield, J. G., Clifton, R. A., & Haynes, T. L. (2006). Enhancing primary and secondary control in achievement settings through writing-based attributional retraining. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 361–391. doi:10.1521/jscp.2006.25.4.361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., & Kollman, S. L. (2012). Motivational implications of faculty performance standards. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40, 724–751. doi:10.1177/1741143212456913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. L., & Kelly, D. G. (1996). Career satisfaction of physical therapy faculty during their pretenure years. Physical Therapy, 76, 1202–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. R. (2009). An empirical exploration of the occupational satisfaction of counselor educators: The influence of gender, tenure status, and minority status. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87, 55–61. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., Saldanha, N., & Deng, X. (2007). A mediation on mediation: Evidence that structural equation models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 140–154. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70020-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2010). Understanding the new majority of non-tenure track faculty in higher education: Demographics, experiences, and plans of action (ASHE Report Series). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lease, S. H. (1999). Occupational role stressors, coping, support, and hardiness as predictors of strain in academic faculty: An emphasis on new and female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 40, 285–307. doi:10.1023/A:1018747000082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechuga, V. M. (2012). Latino faculty in STEM disciplines: Motivation to engage in research activities. Journal of Latinos and Education, 11, 107–123. doi:10.1080/15348431.2012.659564
   Google Scholar
• Lechuga, V. M., & Lechuga, D. C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(2), 59–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, M., & Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1–17. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 603–641. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascret, N., Elliot, A. J., & Cury, F. (2015). The 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for teachers. Educational Psychology, 1–16. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1096324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., Chipperfield, J. G., & Perry, R. P. (1999). Self-perceptions of health: A prospective analysis of mortality, control, and health. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, P85–P93. doi:10.1093/geronb/54B.2.P85
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 28–53. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, A. E., & Zilberstein-Levy, R. (2006). Planning for academic excellence: Tenure and promotion considerations. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 537–554. doi:10.1080/03075070600922725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K., Green, H. C., Good, A. J., & Zang, G. (2011). Finding balance: A challenge for untenured faculty. International Education Studies, 4(4), 3–12. doi:10.5539/ies.v4n4p3
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, D. (1993). Work satisfaction and stress in the first and third year of academic appointment. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 453–471. doi:10.2307/2960052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, R. P., Clifton, R. A., Menec, V. H., Struthers, C. W., & Menges, R. J. (2000). Faculty in transition: A longitudinal analysis of perceived control and type of institution in the research productivity of newly hired faculty. Research in Higher Education, 41, 165–194. doi:10.1023/A:1007091104399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pifer, M. J., & Baker, V. L. (2013). Managing the process: The intradepartmental networks of early-career academics. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 323–337. doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9243-y
   Google Scholar
• Ponjuan, L., Conley, V. M., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 319–346. doi:10.1353/jhe.2011.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounder, J. S. (2007). Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytic framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education, 15, 178–191. doi:10.1108/09684880710748938
   Google Scholar
• Qudais, M. A., Al-Omari, A., & Smadi, R. (2009). The new faculty members’ concerns: The case of Jordanian universities. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(2), 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45, 285–309. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019591.74425.f1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthig, J. C., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2007). Academic optimistic bias: Implications for college student performance and well-being. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 115–137. doi:10.1007/s11218-006-9002-y
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43, 423–446. doi:10.1023/A:1015575616285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupnisky, R. H., Weaver-Hightower, M., & Kartoshkina, Y. (2015). Exploring and testing predictors of new faculty success: A mixed method study. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 368–390. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.842220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotman, C. A., & Brown, B. E. (2005). Faculty recruitment and retention: Concerns of early and mid-career faculty. TIAA-CREF Institute Research Dialogue, 86, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Trower, C. A., & Gallagher, A. S. (2008). Perspectives on what pre-tenure faculty want and what six research universities provide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Occupational outlook handbook, 2016–17 edition: Postsecondary teachers. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/postsecondary-teachers.htm
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002. doi:10.1348/096317909X481382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45, 139–176. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015693.38603.4c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar