Mercury distribution and mobility at the abandoned Puhipuhi mercury mine, Northland, New Zealand

References

• ANZECC, ARMCANZ 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra. Pp. 1–103.
   Google Scholar
• ARC 2001. Background concentrations of inorganic elements in soils from the Auckland region. ARC Technical Publication. http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/council/documents/ ( accessed 29 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Baldi F 1988. Mercury pollution in the soil and mosses around a geothermal plant. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 38: 111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit JM, Gilmour CC, Heyes A, Mason RP, Miller CL 2003. Geochemical and biological controls over methylmercury production and degradation in aquatic ecosystems. ACS Symposium Series 835: 262–297. 10.1021/bk-2003-0835.ch019
   Google Scholar
• Benoit JM, Gilmour CC 1999. Sulfide controls on mercury speciation and bioavailability to methylating bacteria in sediment. Environmental Science and Technology 33: 951–951. 10.1021/es9808200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher M 2010. The Puhipuhi Mercury Mine history and site description. http://www.doc.govt.nz/conservation/historic/by-region/northland/whangarei/puhipuhi-mercury-mines ( accessed 26 April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Christie T, Brathwaite B 1995. Mineral commodity report 8—Mercury. New Zealand Mining 17: 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chrystall L, Rumsby A 2009. Mercury inventory for New Zealand 2008. Technical Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Environment. Auckland, Pattle Demalore Partners Ltd. 136 p.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau GC, Bartha R 1985. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 50: 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craw D, Chappell D, Black A 2002. Surface run‐off from mineralised road aggregate, Puhipuhi, Northland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 36: 105–116. 10.1080/00288330.2002.9517074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craw D, Chappell D, Reay A 2000. Environmental mercury and arsenic sources in fossil hydrothermal systems, Northland, New Zealand. Environmental Geology 39: 875–887. 10.1007/s002549900068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey HA, van Moort JC 1986. Current mercury deposition at Ngawha Springs, New Zealand. Applied Geochemistry 1: 75–93. 10.1016/0883-2927(86)90039-9
   Google Scholar
• DeGraff JV, Rogow M, Trainor P 2007. Approaches to contamination at mercury mill sites: Examples from California and Idaho. Reviews in Engineering Geology 17: 115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Eller PM, Cassinelli ME 1994. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. Cincinnati, OH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrar HT 1925. The geology of the Whangarei–Bay of Islands subdivision, Kaipara division. By authority WAG Skinner. Wellington, Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguli PM 2000. Mercury speciation in drainage from the New Idria mercury mine, California. Environmental Science and Technology 34: 47–73. 10.1021/es991364y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour CC, Riedel GS, Ederington MC, Bell JT, Gill GA, Stordal MC 1998. Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40: 327–345. 10.1023/A:1005972708616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosar M, Teršič T 2012. Environmental geochemistry studies in the area of Idrija mercury mine, Slovenia. Environ Geochem Health 34(1): 27–41. 10.1007/s10653-011-9410-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JE, Theodorakos PM, Bailey EA, Turner RR 2000. Distribution, speciation, and transport of mercury in stream-sediment, stream-water, and fish collected near abandoned mercury mines in southwestern Alaska, USA. The Science of the Total Environment 260(1–3): 21–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JE, Crock JG, Fey DL 2002a. Environmental geochemistry of abandoned mercury mines in West-Central Nevada, USA. Applied Geochemistry 17: 1069–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JE, Crock JG, Lasorsa BK 2002b. Mercury methylation at mercury mines in the Humboldt River Basin, Nevada, USA. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 2: 143–149. 10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JE 2003. Leaching, transport, and methylation of mercury in and around abandoned mercury mines in the Humboldt River Basin and surrounding areas, Nevada. US Geological Survey Bulletin 15.
   Google Scholar
• Gray JE, Greaves IA, Bustos DM, Krabbenhoft DP 2003. Mercury and methylmercury contents in mine-waste calcine, water, and sediment collected from the Palawan Quicksilver Mine, Philippines. Environmental Geology 43(3): 298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JE, Plumlee GS, Morman SA, Higueras PL, Crock JG, Lowers HA et al. 2010. In vitro studies evaluating leaching of mercury from mine waste calcine using simulated human body fluids. Environmental Science and Technology 44: 4782–4788. 10.1021/es1001133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson J 1944. Cinnabar at Puhipuhi and Ngawha, North Auckland. NZ Journal of Science and Technology 26: 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggins FE, Brooks RR 1973. Natural dispersion of mercury from Puhipuhi, Northland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 7: 125–132. 10.1080/00288330.1973.9515459
   Google Scholar
• Kocman D, Kanduč T, Ogrinc N, Horvat M 2010. Distribution and partitioning of mercury in a river catchment impacted by former mercury mining activity. Biogeochemistry 104: 183–201. 10.1007/s10533-010-9495-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabbenhoft DP, Engstrom D, Gilmour C, Harris R, Hurley JP and Mason RP 2007. Monitoring and evaluating trends in sediment and water indicators. In: Harris R, Krabbenhoft DP, Mason R, Murray MW, Reash R, and Saltman T eds. Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination: indicators of change. Webster, NY: SETAC. Pp. 47–86.
   Google Scholar
• Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG 2001. NIST Chemistry webbook. NIST standard reference database No. 69.
   Google Scholar
• Lodenius M 1981. Regional distribution of mercury in Hypogymnia physodes in Finland [air pollution]. Ambio 10.
   Google Scholar
• McLean JE, Bledsoe BE 1992. Behaviour of metals in soils (EPA Ground Water Issue, EPA 540-S-92-018: 25 p.). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health 2013. Guidelines for drinking-water quality management for New Zealand 2013. 3rd edition. Wellington, Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro A, Biester H, Mendoza JL, Cardellach E 2005. Mercury speciation and mobilization in contaminated soils of the Valle del Azogue Hg mine (SE, Spain). Environmental Geology 49: 1089–1101. 10.1007/s00254-005-0152-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northland Regional Council 2002. Groundwater. In: Northland Regional Council State of the Environment Report 2002. Pp. 115–137.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien J 1946. Mines Statement. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives Pp 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Olson ML, DeWild JF 1999. Techniques for the collection and species-specific analysis of low levels of mercury in water, sediment, and biota. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report. Pp. 99–4018.
   Google Scholar
• Olund SD 2004. Methods for the preparation and analysis of solids and suspended solids for total mercury. Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu G, Feng X, Wang S, Shang L 2005. Mercury and methylmercury in riparian soil, sediments, mine-waste calcines, and moss from abandoned Hg mines in east Guizhou province, southwestern China. Applied Geochemistry 20: 627–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimondi V, Gray JE, Costagliola P, Vaselli O, Lattanzi P 2012. Concentration, distribution, and translocation of mercury and methylmercury in mine-waste, sediment, soil, water, and fish collected near the Abbadia San Salvatore mercury mine, Monte Amiata district, Italy. The Science of the Total Environment 414: 318–327. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytuba JJ 2000. Mercury mine drainage and processes that control its environmental impact. The Science of the Total Environment 260: 57–71. 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00541-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytuba JJ 2003. Mercury from mineral deposits and potential environmental impact. Environmental Geology 43(3): 326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scudder BC, Chasar LC, Wentz DA, Bauch NJ, Brigham ME, Moran PW et al. 2009. Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998–2005. Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5109.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel FR ed. 2002. Environmental geochemistry of potentially toxic metals. Berlin, Springer. 218 p.
   Google Scholar
• Steinnes E 2013. Mercury. In: Alloway BJ ed. Heavy metals in soils: trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability. 3rd ed. Berlin, Springer. Pp. 411–428.
   Google Scholar
• Stetson SJ, Gray JE, Wanty RB, Macalady DL 2009. Isotopic variability of mercury in ore, mine-waste calcine, and leachates of mine-waste calcine from areas mined for mercury. Environmental Science and Technology 43: 7331–7336. 10.1021/es9006993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaya M, Joeng JY, Ishihara N, Serita F, Kohyama N 2006. Field evaluation of mercury vapor analytical methods: comparison of the “double amalgam method” and ISO 17733. Industrial Health 44: 287–287. 10.2486/indhealth.44.287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullrich SM, Tanton TW, Abdrashitova SA 2001. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 31: 241–293. 10.1080/20016491089226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP 2013. Minamata convention on mercury—text and annexes. United Nations Environment Programme. Pp. 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA 2001. Mercury update: impact on fish advisories. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Fact Sheet. Pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA 2013. Mercury—Law and Regulations, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/hg/regs.htm ( accessed 11 September 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Vaselli O, Higueras P, Nisi B, María Esbrí J, Cabassi J, Martínez-Coronado A et al. 2013. Distribution of gaseous Hg in the Mercury mining district of Mt. Amiata (Central Italy): A geochemical survey prior the reclamation project. Environmental Research 125: 179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb PC 1940. Mines Statement. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives. Pp. 1–102.
   Google Scholar
• Webb PC 1941. Mines Statement. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives. Pp. 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederhold JG, Smith RS, Siebner H, Jew AD, Brown GE, Bourdon B et al. 2013. Mercury isotope signatures as tracers for Hg cycling at the New Idria Hg mine. Environmental Science and Technology 47: 6137–6145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeaple DS 1972. Mercury in bryophytes (moss). Nature 235: 229–230. 10.1038/235229a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R, Feng X, Wang J, Bao Z, Yu B, Chen J 2013. Mercury isotope variations between bioavailable mercury fractions and total mercury in mercury contaminated soil in Wanshan Mercury Mine, SW China. Chemical Geology 336: 80–86. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar