Professional Development and Its Impact on Children in Early Childhood Education and Care: A Meta-Analysis Based on European Studies

References

• Ahsam, S., Shepherd, J., & Warren-Adamson, C. (2006). Working with pre-school practitioners to improve interactions. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 22(2), 197–217. doi: 10.1191/0265659006ct303oa
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, K. (2010). How does early childhood care and education affect cognitive development? An international review of the effects of early interventions for children from different social backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 140–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, F., Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L., & Masterov, D. V. (2006). Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation. In E. Hanushek, & F. Welsh (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 1, ch. 12, pp. 697–812). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014). Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: A cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 72, 68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta Gupta, N., & Simonsen, M. (2010). Non-cognitive child outcomes and universal high quality child care. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 109–132. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecalle, J., Labat, H., Le Cam, M., Rocher, T., Cros, L., & Magnan, A. (2015). Evidence-based practices to stimulate emergent literacy skills in kindergarten in France: A large-scale study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farran, D. C., & Hofer, K. G. (2013). Evaluating the quality of early childhood education programs. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed., pp. 426–437). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R. G., & Lont, A. (2007). Does training matter? A meta-analysis and review of caregiver training studies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 294–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasteiger, H. (2014). Professionalization of early childhood educators with a focus on natural learning situations and individual development of mathematical competencies: Results from an evaluation study. In C. Benz, B. Brandt, U. Kortenkamp, G. Krummheuer, S. Ladel, & R. Vogel (Eds.), A mathematics education perspective on early mathematics learning between the poles of instruction and construction (pp. 275–290). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, ÅM. (2017). Improving the odds: Identifying language activities that support the language development of preschoolers with poorer vocabulary skills. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research [ advance online publication]. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1258727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Jamil, F. M., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Enhancing teachers’ intentional use of effective interactions with children: Designing and testing professional development interventions. In R. C. Pianta (Ed.), Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 507–532). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrichs, L. F., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2014). Early science instruction and academic language development can go hand in hand: The promising effects of a low-intensity teacher-focused intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2978–2995. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.948944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, J., Martin-Forbes, P., Daley, D., & Williams, M. E. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of the impact of a teacher classroom management program on the classroom behavior of children with and without behavior problems. Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), 571–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Holm, A., & Bremberg, S. (2013). Effectiveness of a Danish early year preschool program: A randomized trial. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 115–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Iannone, R. L., Mantovani, S., Bove, C., Struczyk, M. K., & Wyslowska, O. (2015). Comparative review of professional development approaches. CARE project; Curriculum Quality Analysis and Impact Review of European Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). Retrieved from http://ecec-care.org/resources/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Jensen, P., & Rasmussen, A. W. (2017). Does professional development of preschool teachers improve childrens socio-emotional outcomes? Labour Economics, 45, 26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontopantelis, E., & Reeves, D. (2010). Metaan: Random-effects meta-analysis. Stata Journal, 10(3), 395–407. doi: 10.1177/1536867X1001000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melhuish, E., Ereky-Stevens, K., Petrogiannis, K., Ariescu, A., Penderi, E., Rentzou, K., … Leseman, P. (2015). A review of research on the effects of early childhood education and care (ECEC) upon child development. CARE project; Curriculum Quality Analysis and Impact Review of European Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). Retrieved from http://ecec-care.org/resources/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Montie, J. E., Xiang, Z., & Schweinhart, L. J. (2006). Preschool experience in 10 countries: Cognitive and language performance at age 7. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(3), 313–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pakarinen, E., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., Ahonen, T., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2011). Instructional support predicts children’s task avoidance in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 376–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perels, F., Merget-Kullmann, M., Wende, M., Schmitz, B., & Buchbinder, C. (2009). Improving self-regulated learning of preschool children: Evaluation of training for kindergarten teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 311–327. doi: 10.1348/000709908X322875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, D. R., & Diamond, K. E. (2010). Improving the outcomes of coaching-based professional development interventions. In S. B. Neuman, & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 295–307). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. R., Diamond, K. E., & Cockburn, M. K. (2013). Promising approaches to professional development for early childhood educators. In O. N. Saracho, & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed., pp. 385–392). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnau-Böse, M., & Fröhlich-Gildhoff, K. (2009). The promotion of resilience: A person-centered perspective of prevention in early childhood institutions. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 8(4), 299–318. doi: 10.1080/14779757.2009.9688495
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, R. E. (2015). An analytic study of the professional development research in early childhood education. Early Education and Development, 26(8), 1057–1085. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2015.1009335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., & Smith, D. (2009). The relationship between sample sizes and effect sizes in sytematic reviews in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 500–506. doi: 10.3102/0162373709352369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, P., Hemmeter, M. L., Meeker, K. A., Kinder, K., Pasia, C., & McLaughlin, T. (2012). Characterizing key features of the early childhood professional development literature. Infants & Young Children, 25(3), 188–212. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0b013e31825a1ebf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylva, K., Chan, L. L. S., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2010). Emergent literacy environments: Home and preschool influences on children’s literacy development. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 97–117). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thalmeier, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Somerville, MA: Work-Learning Research Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ulferts, H., Anders, Y., Leseman, P., & Melhuish, E. (2016). Effects of ECEC on academic outcomes in literacy and mathematics: Meta-analysis of European longitudinal studies. CARE project; Curriculum Quality Analysis and Impact Review of European Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). Retrieved from http://ecec-care.org/resources/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Van den Noortgate, W., López-López, J. A., Marin-Martinez, F., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: A multilevel approach. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1274–1294. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0527-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasik, B. A., & Hindman, A. H. (2010). Identifying critical components of an effective preschool language and literacy coaching intervention. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 322–336). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaslow, M., Tout, K., Halle, T., Whittaker, J. V., & Lavelle, B. (2010). Toward the identification of features of effective professional development for early childhood educators. Literature review. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar