2,694
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How Students Categorize Teachers Based on Visual Cues: Implications of Nonverbal Communication for Classroom Management

Pages 569-588 | Received 29 Aug 2017, Accepted 03 Feb 2019, Published online: 15 May 2019

References

  • Acevedo, B. (2011). The screaming pope: Imagery and leadership in two paintings of the Pope Innocent X. Leadership, 7(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1177/1742715010386859
  • Albohn, D. N., & Adams Jr, R. B. (2016). Social vision: At the intersection of vision and person perception. In J. B. Absher, & J. Cloutier (Eds.), Neuroimaging personality, social cognition, and character (pp. 159–186). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800935-2.01001-0
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 431–441. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431
  • Babad, E. (2009). The social psychology of the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ball, M., & Smith, G. (2011). Ethnomethodology and the visual: Practices of looking, visualization, and embodied action. In E. Margolis, & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 392–414). London: Sage.
  • Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bergman, D. (2017). Content analysis of science teacher representations in Google Images. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 17(1), 80–96.
  • Brinck, I. (2017). Empathy, engagement, entertainment: The interaction dynamics of aesthetic experience. Cognitive Processing, 2017, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0805-x
  • Brooks, J. A., & Freeman, J. B. (2017). Neuroimaging of person perception: A social-visual interface. Neuroscience Letters. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.046
  • Brooks, J. A., & Freeman, J. B. (2018). Psychology and neuroscience of person perception. In S. Ghetti (Ed.), Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Vol 4: Developmental and social psychology (pp. 429–464). doi: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn413
  • Bull, R., & Rumsey, N. (2012). The social psychology of facial appearance. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo: Springer.
  • Cohen, J. L. (2010). Teachers in news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper’s discourse on education, 2006-2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 105–119. doi: 10.1080/015963000903465450
  • Dee, T. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210. doi: 10.3386/w8432
  • Demarrais, E., & Robb, J. (2013). Art makes society: An introductory visual essay. World Art, 3(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1080/21500894.2013.782334
  • Egalite, A. J., Kisida, B., & Winters, M. A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.007
  • Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments part 2. Research in Higher Education, 34(2), 151–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00992161
  • Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Membership categorization analysis. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–11). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi: 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi018
  • Francis, D., & Hart, C. (1997). Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial. In S. Hester, & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action. Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 123–151). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
  • Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2014). The dynamic interactive model of person construal: Coordinating sensory and social processes. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-processing theories of the social mind (pp. 235–248). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Freeman, J. B., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 20(5), 362–374. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
  • Freeman, J. B., Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2009). The cultural neuroscience of person perception. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 191–201. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17813-5
  • Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 519–536. doi: 10.1080/10481880903231910
  • Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11, 227–235.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Goldfarb, B. (2002). Visual pedagogy: Media cultures in and beyond the classroom. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Goldstein, R. A. (2011). Imagining the frame: Media representations of teachers, their unions, NCLB, and education reform. Educational Policy, 25(4), 543–576. doi: 10.1177/0895904810361720
  • Gurung, R. A. R., & Vespia, K. (2007). Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 5–10. doi: 10.1080/00986280709336641
  • Hakoköngäs, E., & Sakki, I. (2016). The naturalized nation: Anchoring, objectification and naturalized social representations of history. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 646–669. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v4i2.664
  • Hale, A. J., Freed, J., Ricotta, D., Farris, G., & Smith, C. C. (2017). Twelve tips for effective body language for medical educators. Medical Teacher, 39(9), 914–919. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1324140
  • Hamermersh, D. S., & Parker, A. M. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 369–376. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
  • Hess, U., Adams Jr, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2008). The role of facial expression in person perception. In N. Ambady, & J. J. Skowronski (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 234–254). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In S. Hester, & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action. Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 1–24). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
  • Hester, S., & Francis, D. (2003). Analysing visually available mundane order: A walk to the supermarket. Visual Studies, 18(1), 36–46. doi: 10.1080/14725860320001000056
  • Hoffman, F., & Oreopoulos, P. (2009). A professor like me: The influence of instructor gender on college achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 44(2), 479–494. doi: 10.3368/jhr.44.2.479
  • Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to memberships categorization analysis. In R. Fitzgerald, & W. Housley (Eds.), Advances in membership categorization analysis (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Howsen, R., & Trawick, M. W. (2007). Teachers, race and student achievement revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 14(14), 1023–1027. doi: 10.1080/13504850600706453
  • Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Johnson, K., & Freeman, J. B. (2010). A new look at person construal: Seeing beyond dominance and discreteness. In E. Balcetis, & G. D. Lassiter (Eds.), Social psychology of visual perception (pp. 253–272). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Joseph, S. (2017). Student perceptions of teacher professional attire. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(2), 31–41. doi: 10.15640/jehd.v6n2a4
  • Kesner, L., & Horáček, J. (2017). Empathy-related responses to depicted people in art works. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00228
  • Klugman, C. M., & Beckmann-Mendez, D. (2015). One thousand words: Evaluating an interdisciplinary art education program. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(4), 220–223. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150318-06
  • Lahlou, S. (2015). Social representations and social construction: The evolutionary perspective of installation theory. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 193–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in text and talk: A practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: SAGE.
  • Macrae, N. C., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001). Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 239–255. doi: 10.1348/000712601162059
  • Mannay, D. (2016). Visual, narrative and creative research methods. Application, reflection and ethics. London: Routledge.
  • Martikainen, J. (2011). Käsitettävä taidehistoria. Kuvalähtöinen malli taidehistorian opetukseen kuvallisen ilmaisun ammatillisessa perustutkinnossa [Grasping art history. A picture-based model for teaching art history in the vocational basic degree programme in visual arts.] (Doctoral Dissertation). Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 156. University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Martikainen, J., & Hujala, A. (2017). Johtajuuden visuaaliset kategoriat [Visual categories of leadership.]. Sosiologia, 51(1), 43–62.
  • McArthur, L. A., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215–238. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.215
  • Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Edited by G. Duveen. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Niemi, H., Multasilta, J., Lipponen, L., & Vivitsou, M. (2014). Epilogue: What are innovations in the Finnish educational ecosystem? In H. Niemi, J. Multasilta, L. Lipponen, & M. Vivitsou (Eds.), Finnish innovations and technologies in schools. A guide toward new ecosystem of learning (pp. 165–170). Rotterdam: SensePublications.
  • Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087–11092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805664105
  • Pelllico, L. H., Friedlaender, L., & Fennie, K. P. (2009). Looking is not seeing: Using art to improve observational skills. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 648–653.
  • Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Lauring, J. O., & Leder, H. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160
  • Postholm, M. B. (2013). Classroom management: What does research tell us? European Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 389–402. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2013.12.3.389
  • Riniolo, T. C., Johnson, K. C., Sherman, T. R., & Misso, J. A. (2006). Hot or not: Do professors perceived as physically attractive receive higher student evaluations? The Journal of General Psychology, 133(1), 19–35. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.1.19-35
  • Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K. E. W., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: Toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2(143), doi: 19.3389/fnhum.2012.00143
  • Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
  • Roth, W. M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392. doi: 10.3102/00346543071003365
  • Sacks, H. (1972). Notes on police assessment of moral character. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 280–293). New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Volumes I & II. Edited by G. Jefferson. With an introduction by E. A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171. doi: 10.1080/02680930601158919
  • Sakuta, Y., Kanazawa, S., & Yamaguchi, M. K. (2014). Shedding light on painters’ implicit knowledge: The effect of lightning on recognizing expression and facial impressions of a depicted person in portraits. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 288–295.
  • Schenk, A., & Stumpel, J. (2017). Facial types in painting and recognition skills: Laymen as connoisseurs. Art & Perception, 5(2), 143–167. doi: 10.1163/22134913-00002063
  • Sebastian, R., & Bristol, D. (2008). Formal or informal? The impact of style of dress and forms of address on business students’ perceptions of professors. Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 196–201. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.83.4.196-201
  • Seppänen, J. (2006). The power of gaze: An introduction to visual literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Skowronski, J. J., & Ambady, N. (2008). First impressions: Rationales and roadmap. In N. Ambady, & J. J. Skowronski (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Smotrova, T. (2017). Making pronunciation visible: Gesture in teaching pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 59–89. doi: 10.1002/tesq.276
  • Stedman, N. (2008). Unleashing leadership through artwork. Journal of Leadership Education, 7(2), 14–23.
  • Steer, J. (1989). Art history and direct perception. A general view. Art History, 12(1), 93–108.
  • Steier, R., Pierroux, P., & Krange, I. (2015). Embodied interpretation: Gesture, social interaction, and meaning making in a national art museum. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.05.002
  • Sutherland, C. A. M., Rowley, L. E., Amoaku, U. T., Daguzan, E., Kidd-Rossiter, K. A., Maceviciute, U., & Young, A. W. (2015). Personality judgments from everyday images of faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01616
  • Tai, Y. (2014). The application of body language in English teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1205–1209. doi: 10.4034/jltr.5.5.1205-1209
  • Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–97. doi: 10/1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00620.x
  • Veletsianos, G. (2010). Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: Visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning. Computers & Education, 55(2), 576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.019
  • Watson, R. (2005). The visibility arrangements of public space: Conceptual resources and methodological issues in analyzing pedestrian movements. Communication and Cognition, 38(3/4), 201–228.
  • Westfall, R., Millar, M., & Walsh, M. (2016). Effects of instructor attractiveness on learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 143(3), 161–171. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2016.1200529
  • White, J., & Gardner, J. (2012). The classroom X-factor: The power of body language and nonverbal communication in teaching. London: Routledge.
  • Wikström, B.-M. (2000). Nursing education at an art gallery. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(2), 197–199. doi/10.111/j.1547-5069.2000.00197.x
  • Wikström, B.-M. (2001). Work of art dialogues: An educational technique by which students discover personal knowledge of empathy. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 7, 24–29.
  • Windsor, L. W. (2004). An ecological approach to semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(2), 179–198.
  • Yang, J. (2015). Benefit-oriented socially engaged art. Two cases of social work experiment (Doctoral Dissertation). Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 242. University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Young, S., Rush, L., & Shaw, D. (2009). Evaluating gender bias in ratings of university instructors’ teaching effectiveness. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–14. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030219
  • Zebrowitz, L. A. (1990). Social perception. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.