Collaborative Writing in L1 School Contexts: A Scoping Review

References

• *For references within this article to studies in the scoping review, see appendix 2 (see supplementary material)
   Google Scholar
• Alghasab, M. (2017). Capturing (non-)collaboration in wiki-mediated collaborative writing activities: The need to examine discussion posts and editing acts in tandem. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 664–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1341928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review: Second edition. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. K., Wu, J., Kwan, C. W., & Lai, J. H. (2019). Wiki-based collaborative writing: A comparative study on first and second language writing among Chinese secondary students. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2019.01.01
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas, I., Mateos, M., Martín, E., Luna, M., Martín, A., Solari, M., González-Lamas, J, & Martínez, I (2016). Collaborative writing of an argumentative synthesis from multiple sources: The role of writing beliefs and strategies to deal with controversy. Journal of Writing Research, 8(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.02
   Google Scholar
• Deveci, T. (2018). Student perceptions on collaborative writing in a project-based course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060415
   Google Scholar
• Doult, W., & Walker, S. A. (2014). ‘‘He’s gone and wrote over it’: The use of wikis for collaborative report writing in a primary school classroom. Education 3-13, 42(6), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.752022
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C. (2012). Interactive creative technologies: Changing learning practices and pedagogies in the writing classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H., Chu, S., & Kang, W. (2013). Affordances and constraints of a wiki for primary-school students’ group projects. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2003). Blogs and wikis: Environments for online collaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgers, T. L. (1987). Young writers facing a new collaborative writing task. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568548709594927
   Google Scholar
• Hoogeveen, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2013). What works in writing with peer response? A review of intervention studies with children and adolescents. Educational Psychology Review, 25(4), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9229-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language, Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Bernstein, M., & Georgieva, Z. (2019). Online collaborative writing revision intervention outcomes for struggling and skilled writers: An initial finding. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 63(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2018.1504741
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363
   Google Scholar
• Nordmark, M. (2017). Writing roles: A model for understanding students’ digital writing and the positions that they adopt as writers. Computers and Composition, 46, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.003
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2011). Meeting at the wiki: The new arena for collaborative writing in foreign language courses. In Mark J. W. Lee & Catherine McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching (pp. 209–227). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, V. P. H., & Usaha, S. (2016). Blog-based peer response for L2 writing revision. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 724–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1026355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razak, N. A., & Saeed, M. A. (2014). Collaborative writing revision process among learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) in an online community of practice (CoP). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R., & Hopewell, S. (2009). Gray literature. Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. (2. ed.) H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, J. C. Valentine. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, K. (1997). “Do you want to be in My story?”: Collaborative writing in an urban elementary classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 253–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969709547958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (1999). How we write: Writing as creative design. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, M., & Jaldemark, J. (2020). Visualizing online collaborative writing strategies in higher education group assignments. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2020-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talib, T., & Cheung, Y. L. (2017). Collaborative writing in classroom instruction: A synthesis of recent research. The English Teacher, 46(2), 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9285-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. (2019a). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. (2019b). A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819890949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359–375.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., & Mitchell, D. (2012). Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar