Digital teaching platforms: the use of dynamic functions to express mathematical content

References

• Alshwaikh, J. (2011). Geometrical diagrams as representations and communication: A functional analytic framework. Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2021). To tell a story, you need a protagonist: How dynamic interactive mediators can fulfil this role and foster explorative participation to mathematical discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 291–312. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1007/s10649-020-10009-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelet, D., Ghysels, J., Groot, W., Haelermans, C., & Maassen van den Brink, H. M. (2016). The differential effect of basic mathematics skills homework via a web-based intelligent tutoring system across achievement subgroups and mathematics domains: A randomized field experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergvall, I., & Dyrvold, A. (2021). A model for analysing digital mathematics teaching material from a social semiotic perspective. Designs for Learning, 13(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.167
   Google Scholar
• Byun, J., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game-based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta-analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3-4), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrvold, A. (2020). Relations between semiotic resources in mathematics tasks: A source of students’ difficulties. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1689160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrvold, A. (2022). Underuse of dynamic elements in digital teaching platforms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 41(2), 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, A. S., Barry, A. L., Rothrock, K. S., & Pelkey, M. M. (2020). Mathematics student teachers’ views and choices about teaching and textbooks in middle and high school classrooms. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M. (2012). International assessment: A Rasch model and teachers’ evaluation of TIMSS science achievement items. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1321–1344. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1002/tea.21059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, R., & Averill, R. (2012). A Lesson based on the use of contexts: An example of effective practice in secondary school mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 14(1), 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C.-Y., & Chen, M.-J. (2016). Influence of prior knowledge and teaching approaches integrating non-routine worked examples and digital technologies on the performance and attitude of fifth-graders in learning equivalent fractions. In P. S. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 189–212). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, A., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2017). Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks: Potential and pitfalls. (1st 2017. ed.). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. Farmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., & Sfard, A. (2016). Investigating changes in high-stakes mathematics examinations: a discursive approach. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 92–119. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1080/14794802.2016.1176596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, V. S. I., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2019). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. 2020 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). 21st-Century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: language, symbolism and visual images. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, P., Choppin, J., Ruthven, L., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM, 49(5), 645–661. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, A. E., Alibali, M. W., & Kalish, C. W. (2017). Does it matter how Molly does it? Person-presentation of strategies and transfer in mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 315–320. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1007/BF00302715
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2008). Studying the classroom implementation of tasks: High-level mathematical tasks embedded in ‘real-life’ contexts. Teaching & Teacher Education, 24(4), 859–875. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z. (2016). Closing remarks. In M. Bates & Z. Usiskin (Eds.), Digital curricula in school mathematics (pp. 297–301). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z. (2018). Electronic vs. paper textbook presentations of the various aspects of mathematics. ZDM, 50(5), 849–861. https://doi-org.ezproxy.its.uu.se/10.1007/s11858-018-0936-2
   Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F., Feskens, R., & Eggen, T. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. Retrieved December 9, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2475302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647028
   Google Scholar
• Van Lehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.-H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 73, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeynivandnezhad, F., Mousavi, A., & Kotabe, H. (2020). The mediating effect of study approaches between perceptions of mathematics and experiences using digital technologies. Computers in the Schools, 37(3), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1793050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar