How Do Private Sector Schools Serve the Public Good by Fostering Inclusive Service Delivery Models?

References

• Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archdiocese of St. Louis Catholic Education Office. (2001). Early identification of students' special needs (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Archdiocese of St. Louis Catholic Education Office. (2003). Resources for addressing students' special needs in Catholic schools and programs (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D., & Riordan, C. (1998). The “eliting” of the common American Catholic school and the national education crisis. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. B. (1991). A realistic look at the research base for collaboration in special education. Preventing School Failure, 35, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M. (1985). Training special educators to be consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 8(3), 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1992). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, D. (Writer), Chilcott, L., & Birtel, M. (Producers). (2010). Waiting for Superman. Los Angeles, CA: Electric Kinney Films.
   Google Scholar
• Gutkin, T., & Curtis, M. (1981). School-based consultation: The indirect service delivery concept. In M. Curtis & J. Zins (Eds.), The theory and practice of school consultation. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. W. (Ed.). (2008). Who will save America's urban Catholic schools? New York, NY: Thomas Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, T. (2000). Catholic school attendance and student achievement: A review and extension of research. In J. Youniss & J. Convey (Eds.), Catholic schools at the crossroads: Survival and transformation (pp. 87–112). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. R., & Sugarman, J. (2007). Realizing the vision of two-way immersion: Fostering effective programs and classrooms. Wasington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Idol, L. (1988). A rationale and guidelines for establishing special education consultation programs. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idol, L. (1989). The resource/consulting teacher: An integrated model of service delivery. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D., & Schultz, M. (2010). United States Catholic elementary and secondary schools 2009–2010: The annual statistical report on schools, enrollment, and staffing. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011). Characteristics of private schools in the United States: Results from the 2009–10 Private School Universe Survey. Retrieved April 23, 2012, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011339.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, J., & Scheopner, A. (2009). Bridging the gap: Urban Catholic schools addressing educational achievement and opportunity gaps in the United States. International Studies in Catholic Education, 12, 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008). Re-discovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall. Retrieved from http://www.community-wealth.org/_pdfs/articles-publications/social/article-phills-et-al.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, P., McLaughlin, V., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68, 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandor, W. (2001). Catholic schools: Private and social effects. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M. (2008). Grammar of Catholic schooling and radically “catholic” schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 12, 25–54.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M. (2009a). All are welcome: Inclusive service delivery in Catholic schools. South Bend, IN: Alliance for Catholic Education Press at the University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M. (2009b). Leadership dynamics promoting systemic reform for inclusive service delivery. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 622–660.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M. (2009c). Moral, legal, and functional dimensions of inclusive service delivery in Catholic schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 12, 536–552.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M. (2011). The role of an epistemology of inclusivity on the pursuit of social justice: A case study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M., & Miller, P. M. (2013). In fits and starts: Learning to create a neighborhood educational opportunity zone. Teachers College Record, 115. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=16948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlan, M., & Zehrbach, G. (2010). Improving bilingual service delivery in Catholic schools through two-way immersion. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 14, 67–93.
   Google Scholar
• Storz, M., & Nestor, K. (2007). They call us to justice: Responding to the call of the Church and our students. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, R. J. (2012). Urban Catholic schools in expanding charter school markets. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• West, J. F., & Cannon, G. (1988). Essential collaborative consultation competencies for regular and special educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar