532
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Albrecht, S. F., Skiba, R. J., Losen, D. J., Chung, C., & Middleberg, L. (2012). Federal policy on disproportionality in special education: Is it moving us forward? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 14–25.
  • Artiles, A. J. (1998). The dilemma of difference enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context. Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 32–36.
  • Artiles, A. J. (2011). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational equity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher, 40, 431–445.
  • Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., Trent, S. C., Osher, D., & Ortiz, A. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 279–299.
  • Ball, S. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent educational policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 257–274.
  • Bobo, L. D. (2011). Somewhere between Jim Crow & post-racialism: Reflections on the racial divide in America today. Daedalus, 140, 11–36.
  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bonilla-Silva, E. (2016). The structure of racism in color-blind, “post-racial” America. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1358–1376.
  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cavendish, W., Artiles, A. J., & Harry, B. (2015). Tracking inequality 60 years after Brown: Does policy legitimize the racialization of disability? Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 14, 1–11.
  • Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education/Committee on minority representation in special education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Dumas, M. J. (2016). Against the dark: Antiblackness in education policy and discourse. Theory into Practice, 55, 11–19.
  • Dunn, L. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly mentally retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
  • Edelman, L. B., Krieger, L. H., Eliason, S. R., Albiston, C. R., & Mellema, V. (2011). When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures 1. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 888–954.
  • Eitle, T. M. (2002). Special education or racial segregation: Understanding variation in the representation of Black students in educable mentally handicapped programs. Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 575–605.
  • Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2006; 2014). Why are so many minority students in special education? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Hehir, T. (2002). IDEA and disproportionality: Federal enforcement, effective advocacy, and strategies for change. Racial Inequity in Special Education, 2002, 219–238.
  • Kramarczuk Voulgarides, C. (2015). Special education law and disproportionality: Does compliance matter? ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New York, NY: New York University.
  • Kramarczuk Voulgarides, C., Fergus, E. & King-Thorius, K. A. (2017) Pursuing Equity: Disproportionality in Special Education and the Reframing of Technical Solutions to Address Systemic Inequities. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 61–87.
  • Lewis, A. E. & Diamond. J. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Lewis-McCoy, R. (2014). Inequality in the promised land: Race, resources, and suburban schooling. Stanford University Press.
  • Losen, D. J. (Ed.). (2014). Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Losen, D. J., & Orfield, G. (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequality in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Maguire, M., Ball, S., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York, NY: Routledge
  • March, G., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
  • Minow, M. (2010). In Brown’s wake: legacies of America’s educational landmark. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Pollock, M. (2008). Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school. New York, NY: New Press
  • Pollock, M. (2004). Colormute: Race talk dilemmas in an American school. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Renee, M., Welner, K. G., & Oakes, J. (2010). Social movement organizing and equity- focused educational change: Shifting the “zone of mediation.” in A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, D. Hopkins, & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 153–168). New York, NY: Springer International Handbooks.
  • Sieber, S. (1981). Fatal remedies: The ironies of social intervention. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564.
  • Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C. G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85.
  • Skiba, R. J., Simmons, A. B., Ritter, S., Gibb, A. C., Rausch, M. K., Cuadrado, J., et al., (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74, 264–288.
  • Taylor, S. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tefera, A. A., Gonzalez, T., & Artiles, A. J. (2017). Challenges to policy as a tool for educational equity: The case of language and ability difference intersections. In S. Salas & P. R. Portes (Eds.), Latinization of K–12 communities: National perspectives on regional change. New York: SUNY Press.
  • Tyson, K. (Ed.). (2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, Black students, and acting White after Brown. Oxford University Press.
  • United States. Government Accountability Office. (2013). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Standards needed to improve identification of racial and ethnic overrepresentation in special education: Report to the Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate. [Washington, DC]: United States Government Accountability Office
  • US Department of Education. (2016). 650 U.S. Department of Education takes action to deliver equity for students with disabilities. http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department- education-takes-action-deliver-equity- 655 students-disabilities?utm_content=&utm_ medium=email&utm_name=&utm_ source=govdelivery&utm_term=.
  • Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Waitoller, F. R., Artiles, A. J., & Cheney, D. A. (2010). The miner’s canary: A review of overrepresentation research and explanations. Journal of Special Education, 44, 29–49.
  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
  • Wells, T., Hogan, D. P., & Sandefur, G. D. (2003). What happens after the high school years among young persons with disabilities? Social Forces, 82(2), 803–832.
  • Welner, K. G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.