Should we “just stick to the facts”? The benefit of controversial conversations in classrooms

References

• Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2021, November 2). Critical race theory is a flashpoint for conservatives, but what does it mean? PBS News Hour. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/so-much-buzz-but-what-is-critical-race-theory
   Google Scholar
• Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2021, September 9). Facts about bullying. StopBullying.gov. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https://www.stopbullying.gov/resources/facts#_Bullying_Research
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 1–15). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Blad, E. (2020, February 13). There’s pushback to social-emotional learning. Here’s what happened in one state. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/education/theres-pushback-to-social-emotional-learning-heres-what-happened-in-one-state/2020/02
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed‐ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown Buchanan, L. (2015). “We make it controversial”: Elementary preservice teachers’ beliefs about race. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42(1), 3–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/teaceducquar.42.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Carter Andrews, D. J., Richmond, G., Warren, C. A., Petchauer, E., & Floden, R. (2018). A call to action for teacher preparation programs: Supporting critical conversations and democratic action in safe learning environments. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118766510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Chajut, E., Saporta, K., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2006). The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2022). English language arts standards. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/SL/introduction/
   Google Scholar
• Darolia, L. (2020). “He’s on fire for justice!”: Using critical conversations to explore sociopolitical topics in elementary classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 2(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.02.01.3
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, A. L., Lavigne, A. L., & de la Garza, T. O. (2016). Communicating care across culture and language: The student–teacher relationship as a site of socialization in public schools. Humanity & Society, 40(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597616643882
   Google Scholar
• Education Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. § 5812 et seq. (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Eliason, M. J., & Turalba, R. (2019). Recognizing oppression: College students’ perceptions of identity and its impact on class participation. The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 1257–1281. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis (No. 7). W.W. Norton & company.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. (2015). Student engagement with others’ mathematical ideas: The role of teacher invitation and support moves. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1086/683174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredman, A. J., Schultz, N. J., & Hoffman, M. F. (2015). “You’re moving a frickin’ big ship: The challenges of addressing LGBTQ topics in public schools. Education and Urban Society, 47(1), 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513496457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser, L., Grütter, J., Buholzer, A., & Wettstein, A. (2018). Emotionally supportive classroom interactions and students’ perceptions of their teachers as caring and just. Learning and Instruction, 54, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. R. (2002). Constructivism, standards, and the classroom community of inquiry. Educational Theory, 52(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00397.x
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2004). Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37(2), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, L. (2009). Complicated conversations: Exploring race and ideology in an elementary classroom. Urban Education, 44(1), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907312496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima-Ginsberg, K., & Junco, R. (2018). Teaching controversial issues in a time of polarization. Social Education, 82(6), 323–329. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ncss/se/2018/00000082/00000006/art00005
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, S. C., & Hartsfield, D. E. (2019). It was … the word “scrotum” on the first page: Educators’ perspectives of controversial literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117751126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. J., Vickery, A. E., & Caffrey, G. (2018). A pathway to racial literacy: Using the LETS ACT framework to teach controversial issues. Social Education, 82(6), 316–322. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/ncss/se/2018/00000082/00000006/art00004
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., & Solórzano, D. G. (2012). Teachers, please learn our names!: Racial microaggressions and the K-12 classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.674026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-J., Kraatz, E., Ha, S. Y., Hsieh, M.-Y., Glassman, M., Nagpal, M., Sallade, R., & Shin, S. (2021). Shaping classroom social experiences through collaborative small-group discussions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), e12442. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107
   Google Scholar
• Muth, K. D., Polizzi, N. C., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Case-based teacher preparation for teaching controversial topics in middle school. Middle School Journal, 38(5), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2007.11461598
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Birth Defects and Intellectual Disabilities. (2022, March 31). Important milestones: Your baby by five years. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/milestones/milestones-5yr.html
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2021, April 12). Social and emotional learning. https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/social-emotional-learning.aspx#:~:text=The%20Collaborative%20for%20Academic%2C%20Social,skills%2C%20and%20responsible%20decision%20making.&text=These%20skills%20are%20learned%20in,home%2C%20preschool%2C%20and%20schools
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (1994). Conversation as moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 23(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724940230201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues‐teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paff, L. A. (2015). Does grading encourage participation? Evidence & implications. College Teaching, 63(4), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1028021
   Google Scholar
• Ray, R., & Gibbons, A. (2021, November). Why are states banning critical race theory? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2021/07/02/why-are-states-banning-critical-race-theory/
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, H. M., Silvernell, D., & Mercer, F. (2020). Teaching in an era of political divisiveness: An exploration of strategies for discussing controversial issues. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1762063
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosheim, K. C. (2018). A cautionary tale about using the word shy: An action research study of how three quiet learners demonstrated participation beyond speech. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(6), 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieble, M. (2012). Critical conversations on whiteness with young adult literature. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieble, M., Vetter, A., & Martin, K. M. (2021). Critical listening for critical conversations. English Journal, 111(2), 71–77. https://www.proquest.com/openview/96a6aaf1235b41d66c71d2042acae35e/1?cbl=42045&pq-origsite=gscholar&parentSessionId=jew%2FMRcClvB7jORFSxd4xdOuD54IPZMhSdDjm%2FX2iwc%3D
   Google Scholar
• Schweinle, A., Turner, J., & Meyer, D. (2008). Understanding young adolescents’ optimal experiences in academic settings. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.2.125-146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlacek, M., & Sedova, K. (2017). How many are talking? The role of collectivity in dialogic teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2013). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 377–394). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Education Research, 47(6), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Tannebaum, R. P. (2013). Dialogue, discussion, and democracy in the social studies classroom. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2013-B0007
   Google Scholar
• Teven, J. J. (2001). The relationships among teacher characteristics and perceived caring. Communication Education, 50(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379241
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, A., Schieble, M., & Meacham, M. (2018). Critical conversations in English education: Discursive strategies for examining how teacher and student identities shape classroom discourse. English Education, 50(3), 255–282. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26492563
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A., Schieble, M., & Martin, K. M. (2020). Critical talk moves in critical conversations: Examining power and privilege in an English language arts classroom. English in Education, 55(4), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2020.1848351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Scientific legacy. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. (2018). Empathy, teacher dispositions, and preparation for culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117712487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51–85). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. W. (2011). Resistance to classroom participation: Minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole class discussions. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(4), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.598128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
   Google Scholar