Variation in predicting pantograph–catenary interaction contact forces, numerical simulations and field measurements

References

• Poetsch G, Evans J, Meisinger R, et al. Pantograph/catenary dynamics and control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1997;28:159–195. doi: 10.1080/00423119708969353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling F, Puschmann R, Schmieder A, et al. Contact lines for electric railways: planning, design, implementation, maintenance. 2nd ed. Erlangen: Publicis Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wu TX, Brennan MJ. Dynamic stiffness of a railway overhead wire system and its effect on pantograph–catenary system dynamics. J Sound Vib. 1999;219:483–502. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto A, Benet J, Arias E, et al. A high performance tool for the simulation of the dynamic pantograph–catenary interaction. Math Comput Simul. 2008;79:652–667. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2008.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei G, Zhang W, Zhao H, et al. A hybrid method to simulate the interaction of pantograph and catenary on overlap span. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:571–580. doi: 10.1080/00423110600875559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Park TW, Oh HK, et al. Analysis of dynamic interaction between catenary and pantograph with experimental verification and performance evaluation in new high-speed line. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:1117–1134. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2015.1025797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstmayr J, Shabana AA. Analysis of thin beams and cables using the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation. Nonlin Dyn. 2006;45:109–130. doi: 10.1007/s11071-006-1856-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Rebollo C, Jimenez-Octavio JR, Carnicero A. Active control strategy on a catenary–pantograph validated model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51:554–569. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.764455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappalardo CM, Patel MD, Tinsley B, et al. Contact force control in multibody pantograph/catenary systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Multi-Body Dyn. 2016;230:307–328. doi: 10.1177/1464419315604756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda M, Nagasaka S, Usuda T. A precise contact force measuring method for overhead catenary system. Paper presented at: Proceedings of world Congress on railway research; Köln: UIC; 2001. Available from: http://www.railway-research.org/IMG/pdf/015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Usuda T. The pantograph contact force measurement method in overhead catenary system. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 8th world Congress on railway research. Seoul, South Korea: UIC; 2008. Available from: http://www.railway-research.org/IMG/pdf/s.1.4.3.4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Shen Z, Zeng J. Study on dynamics of coupled systems in high-speed trains. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(7):966–1016. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.798421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucca G, Collina A. Electromechanical interaction between carbon-based pantograph strip and copper contact wire: a heuristic wear model. Tribol Int. 2015;92:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEK. NEK EN 50317:2012 Railway applications – Current collection systems – requirements for and validation of measurements of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Rauter F, et al. A memory based communication in the co-simulation of multibody and finite element codes for pantograph-catenary interaction simulation multibody dynamics. In: Bottasso CL, editor. Multibody dynamics computational methods and applications. Netherlands: Springer Verlag; 2009. p. 231–252.
   Google Scholar
• Collina A, Bruni S. Numerical simulation of pantograph-overhead equipment interaction. Veh Syst Dyn. 2002;38:261–291. doi: 10.1076/vesd.38.4.261.8286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nåvik P, Rønnquist A, Stichel S. The use of dynamic response to evaluate and improve the optimization of existing soft railway catenary systems for higher speeds. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230:1388–1396. doi: 10.1177/0954409715605140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønnquist A, Nåvik P. Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:756–774. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2015.1013040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A, et al. The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:412–435. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.953183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nåvik P, Rønnquist A, Stichel S. A wireless railway catenary structural monitoring system: full-scale case study. Case Stud Struct Eng. 2016;6:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.csse.2016.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Frøseth GT, Nåvik P, Rønnquist A. Close range photogrammetry for measuring the response of a railway catenary system. In: Pombo J, editor. Proceedings of the third international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance. Stirlingshire (UK): Civil-Comp Press; 2016. Paper 102. doi: 10.4203/ccp.110.102
   Google Scholar
• Rønnquist A, Nåvik P. Exploring dynamic behaviour of soft catenaries subject to regular loading using full scale measurements. In: Pombo J, editor. Proceedings of the third international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance. Stirlingshire: Civil-Comp Press; 2016. Paper 101. doi: 10.4203/ccp.110.101
   Google Scholar
• Nåvik P, Rønnquist A, Stichel S. Identification of system damping in railway catenary wire systems from full-scale measurements. Eng Struct. 2016;113:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekanisk systembeskrivelse av kontaktledningsanlegg [Internet]. The Norwegian National Rail Administration; [cited 2013 Oct 2]. Available from: http://www.jernbanekompetanse.no/wiki/Mekanisk_systembeskrivelse_av_kontaktledningsanlegg
   Google Scholar
• NEK. NEK EN 50318:2002 Railway applications – current collection systems – Validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale M, Facchinetti A, Maggiori L, et al. Computational fluid dynamics as a means of assessing the influence of aerodynamic forces on the mean contact force acting on a pantograph. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230:1698–1713. doi: 10.1177/0954409715606748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Nonlinear analysis of wind-induced vibration of high-speed railway catenary and its influence on pantograph–catenary interaction. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54:723–747. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1156134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABAQUS 6.14 Theory Manual. Dassault Systèmes; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Pereira M, et al. Recent developments in pantograph-catenary interaction modelling and analysis. Int J Railw Technol. 2012;1:249–278. doi: 10.4203/ijrt.1.1.12
   Google Scholar
• ROGER 1000 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.mermecgroup.com/inspect/recording-cars/104/roger-1000.php
   Google Scholar
• BANVERKET. Analys av kontaktledningsdynamik vid flera verksamma strömavtagare Del 1, BKL 02/10. Banverket 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale M, Collina A. Processing of collector acceleration data for condition-based monitoring of overhead lines. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230:472–485. doi: 10.1177/0954409714545637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou N, Zhang W, Li R. Dynamic performance of a pantograph-catenary system with the consideration of the appearance characteristics of contact surfaces. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. 2011;12:913–920. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A11GT015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Pereira M. Optimization of high-speed railway pantographs for improving pantograph-catenary contact. Theor Appl Mech Lett. 2013;3:013006. doi: 10.1063/2.1301306
   Google Scholar