The key to scaling in the digital era: Simultaneous automation, individualization and interdisciplinarity

References

• Achillas, C., Tzetzis, D., & Raimondo, M. O. (2017). Alternative production strategies based on the comparison of additive and traditional manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3497–3509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1282645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar, P., Khan, Z., Tarba, S., & Jayawickrama, U. (2018). The Internet of Things, dynamic data and information processing capabilities, and operational agility. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, J., Marques, M. J., Saur, I., & Marques, P. (2007). Creativity and innovation through multidisciplinary and multisectoral cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00417.x
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage of firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkhipova, D., & Bozzoli, C. (2018). Digital capabilities. In G. Bongiorno, D. Rizzo, & G. Vaia (Eds.), CIOs and the digital transformation (pp. 121–146). Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (2017). Digitalisation, ecosystems, entrepreneurship and policy. Perspectives into topical issues in society and ways to support political decision making: Government’s analysis, research and assessment. Activities Policy Brief.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, H. (2003). Fit among competitive strategy, administrative mechanisms, and performance: A comparative study of small firms in mature and new industries. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitekine, A. (2008). Prospective case study design. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106292900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y., & Sendra García, F. J. (2021). Flexible pattern matching approach: Suggestions for augmenting theory evolvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruque, S., & Moyano, J. (2007). Organisational determinants of information technology adoption and implementation in SMEs: The case of family and cooperative firms. Technovation, 27(5), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Hunt, G. (2000). What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<127::AID-SMJ75>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canhoto, A. I. (2021). Leveraging machine learning in the global fight against money laundering and terrorism financing: An affordances perspective. Journal of Business Research, 131, 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53. https://hciforstartups.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/What-Is-Disruptive-Innovation.pdf</
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, A., Gray, B. J., & Ahn, M. J. (2011). Enablers and barriers to university and high technology SME partnerships. Small Enterprise Research, 18(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.18.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed model approaches. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amboise, G. (1993). Do small business manifest a certain strategic logic? An approach for identifying it. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1993.10600444
   Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., Llopis, O., Rentocchini, F., & Yegros, A. (2019). The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction. Research Policy, 48(9), 103799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deradjat, D., & Minshall, T. (2017). Implementation of rapid manufacturing for mass customisation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibrell, C., Davis, P. S., & Craig, J. (2008). Fueling innovation through information technology in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1249–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyers, D., & Dotchev, K. (2010). Technology review for mass customisation using rapid manufacturing. Assembly Automation, 30(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445151011016055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2011). Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2014). Online entrepreneurial communication: Mitigating uncertainty and increasing differentiation via twitter. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsten-Astikainen, R., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Lämsä, T., Heilmann, P., & Hyrkäs, E. (2017). Dealing with organizational silos with communities of practice and human resource management. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(6), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-04-2015-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller-Love, N. (2000). The impact of digital technology on small businesses in the media industry. International Small Business Journal, 18(4), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242600184005
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, M., Seppälä, T., & Gabrielsson, P. (2016). Realizing a hybrid competitive strategy and achieving superior financial performance while internationalizing in the high-technology market. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, J., & Fink, M. (2018). The magic cube: Towards a theoretical framework to explain the disruptive potential of additive manufacturing. Translational Materials Research, 5(2), 024003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1613/aaca53
   Google Scholar
• Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417664
   Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2017). Digital economics (No. w23684). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Groover, M. P. (2001). Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing (2 ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, X., & Koren, Y. (2018). Manufacturing system architecture for cost-effective mass-individualization. Manufacturing Letters, 16, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Research, 12(2), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X012002014
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W. L. (1988). Differentiation versus low cost or differentiation and low cost: A contingency frame- work. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. J., & Szulanski, G. (2007). Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Science, 53(11), 1716–1730. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, W. J., Leach, M. P., & Liu, A. H. (1999). Theory testing using case studies in business-to-business research. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00040-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnani, A. (1984). Generic competitive strategies—an analytical approach. Strategic Management Journal, 5(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., Nam, D.-I., & Stimpert, J. L. (2004). The applicability of Porter’s generic strategies in the digital age: Assumptions, conjectures, and suggestions. Journal of Management, 30(5), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelling, M., Neyer, A. K., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010). Strategies towards innovative services: Findings from the German service landscape. The Service Industries Journal, 30(4), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060903078776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, Y., Shpitalni, M., Gu, P., & Hu, S. J. (2015). Product design for mass-individualization. Procedia CIRP, 36, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.050
   Google Scholar
• Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/259084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krylova, K. O., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2016). Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: The crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), 1045–1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Fink, M. (2019). Rural social entrepreneurship: The role of social capital within and across institutional levels. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzolla, G., & Suarez, F. F. (2012). Closing the technology adoption–use divide: The role of contiguous user bandwagon. Journal of Management, 38(3), 836–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, D., Hitt, M. A., & Goldhar, J. D. (1996). Advanced manufacturing technology: Organizational design and strategic flexibility. Organization Studies, 17(3), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069601700307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, K.-H., & Güldenberg, S. (2009). Generic strategies and firm performance in SMEs: A longitudinal study of Austrian SMEs. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9239-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. B., & Li, J. J. (2008). Achieving superior financial performance in China: Differentiation, cost leadership, or both? Journal of International Marketing, 16(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.16.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92-93, 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton, J. D., & Walsh, S. T. (2004). Integrating innovation and learning curve theory: An enabler for moving nanotechnologies and other emerging process technologies into production. R&D Management, 34(5), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. S. (1988). The history of computing in the history of technology. Annals of the History of Computing, 10(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.1988.10011
   Google Scholar
• Maresch, D., Fink, M., & Harms, R. (2016). When patents matter: The impact of competition and patent age on the performance contribution of intellectual property rights protection. Technovation, 57, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maresch, D., & Gartner, J. (2020). Make disruptive technological change happen-The case of additive manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Markides, C., & Sosa, L. (2013). Pioneering and first mover advantages: The importance of business models. Long Range Planning, 46(4–5), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markides, C. C. (2013). Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Moya, M., & Munuera-Aleman, J. L. (2016). The differential effect of development speed and launching speed on new product performance: An analysis in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 750–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. (1988). A contingency view of Porter’s “generic strategies. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/258087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, D. (2017). Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(1), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parayil, G. (1991). Technological knowledge and technological change. Technology in Society, 13(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(91)90005-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pergelova, A., Manolova, T., Simeonova-Ganeva, R., & Yordanova, D. (2019). Democratizing entrepreneurship? Digital technologies and the internationalization of female-led SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2009). Competitive strategies and firm performance: A comparative analysis of pure, hybrid and “stuck-in-the-middle” strategies of Spanish firms. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.2307/257639
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. (1993). The role of core competencies in the corporation. Research-Technology Management, 36(6), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1993.11670940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, D., Rosin, A. F., Stubner, S., & Pinkwart, A. (2021). The influence of a digital strategy on the digitalization of new ventures: The mediating effect of digital capabilities and a digital culture. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1883036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2018). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuber, A. R., Tippmann, E., & Monaghan, S. (2021). Global scaling as a logic of multinationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6), 1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00417-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46(6), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.6.824.11940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salavou, H. E. (2015). Competitive strategies and their shift to the future. European Business Review, 27(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-04-2013-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneckenberg, D. (2015). Open innovation and knowledge networking in a multinational corporation. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-08-2013-0066
   Google Scholar
• Scuotto, V., Nicotra, M., Del Giudice, M., Krueger, N., & Gregori, G. L. (2021). A microfoundational perspective on SMEs’ growth in the digital transformation era. Journal of Business Research, 129, 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2020). A call for research on the scaling of organizations and the scaling of social impact. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720950599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkovics, N. (2018). Pattern matching in qualitative analysis. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: Methods and challenges (pp. 468–484). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.16928421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, Y. E., Zaralis, G., & Lioukas, S. (2004). Strategy and industry effects on profitability: Evidence from Greece. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G., & Jensen, R. J. (2006). Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 937–957. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G., & Jensen, R. J. (2008). Growing through copying: The negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1732–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardieu, H., Daly, D., Esteban-Lauzán, J., Hall, J., & Miller, G. (2020). The birth of digital—A brief history of digital technologies. In Deliberately digital. Future of business and finance (pp. 3–7). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37955-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Linden, G. (2017). Business models, value capture, and the digital enterprise. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0018-x
   Google Scholar
• Thornhill, S., & White, R. E. (2007). Strategic purity: A multi-industry evaluation of pure vs. hybrid business strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, R., Hermina, W., & Walsh, S. (2013). The pharmaceutical technology landscape: A new form of technology roadmapping. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90052-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troise, C., Corvello, V., Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2022). How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital area. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, M. M., Wang, Y., & Jiao, R. J. (2001). Mass customization. In The International Academy for Produ, Laperrière, L., & Reinhart, G. (Eds.), CIRP encyclopedia of production engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7_16701-3
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. T., & Linton, J. D. (2001). The competence pyramid: A framework for identifying and analyzing firm and industry competence. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320124246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (1995). Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines, and replication. In C. A. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_7
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, R. K., & Marquardt, M. J. (2015). Think before you act: Organizing structures of action in technology-induced change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(4), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2013-0247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Liu, W., & Si, S. (2022). How digital technology promotes entrepreneurship in ecosystems. Technovation, 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar