Patterns in Motion: How Visual Patterns in Ads Affect Product Evaluations

REFERENCES

• Arnheim, Rudolf (1954), Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye: The New Version. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. (2008), “Grounded Cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, Boyoun, and JoAndrea Hoegg (2013), “The Future Looks ‘Right’: Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cian, Luca, Aradhna Krishna, and Ryan S. Elder (2014), “This Logo Moves Me: Dynamic Imagery from Static Images,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (2), 184–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvijikj, Irena P., and Florian Michahelles (2013), “Online Engagement Factors on Facebook Brand Pages,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3 (4), 843–861.
   Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker, Patrick, Maggie Geuens, and Pascal Anckaert (2002), “Media Context and Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Context Appreciation and Context/Ad Similarity,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (2), 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Lisette, Sonja Gensler, and Peter S.H. Leeflang (2012), “Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26 (2), 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, Ryan S., and Aradhna Krishna (2012), “The Visual Depiction Effect: Inducing Embodied Mental Simulation That Evokes Motor Responses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (6), 988–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, Jennifer Edson (2004), “Imagine Yourself in the Product: Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion,” Journal of Advertising, 33 (2), 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farace, Stefania, Tom van Laer, Ko de Ruyter, and Martin Wetzels (2017), “Assessing the Effect of Narrative Transportation, Portrayed Action, and Photographic Style on the Likelihood to Comment on Posted Selfies,” European Journal of Marketing, 51 (11/12), 1961–1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franses, Philip H., and Rutger van Oest (2007), “On the Econometrics of the Geometric Lag Model,” Economics Letters, 95 (2), 291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkiouzepas, Lampros, and Margaret K. Hogg (2011), “Articulating a New Framework for Visual Metaphors in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 40 (1), 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew F., and Kristopher J. Preacher (2014), “Statistical Mediation Analysis with a Multicategorical Independent Variable,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67 (3), 451–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimbach, Irina, and Oliver Hinz (2016), “The Impact of Content Sentiment and Emotionality on Content Virality,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33 (3), 695–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, Paul (2006), “Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design,” Psychology Science, 48 (2), 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, Philip M. (1995), “Collision Detection for Interactive Graphics Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1 (3), 218–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, Ashlee, and Rebecca J. Wang (2017), “Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1274–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, Jonathon P. (2016), “Moving Convergence Culture towards Cultural Intermediation: Social Media and Cultural Inclusion,” Continuum, 30 (2), 158–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutkowitz, Alexander (2014), “The Content Marketing Revolution,” Harvard Business Review, July 1, https://hbr.org/2014/07/the-content-marketing-revolution.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Minjeong, and Sharron Lennon (2008), “The Effects of Visual and Verbal Information on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in Internet Shopping,” Psychology and Marketing, 25 (2), 146–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunter, and Theo van Leeuwen (2006), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed., Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Labroo, Aparna A., Ravi Dhar, and Norbert Schwarz (2007), “Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (6), 819–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberton, Cait, and Andrew T. Stephen (2016), “A Thematic Exploration of Digital, Social Media, and Mobile Marketing: Research Evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an Agenda for Future Inquiry,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 146–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Dokyun, Kartik Hosanagar, and Harikesh S. Nair (2018), “Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook,” Management Science, 64 (11), 5105–5131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, Stephan, Ko de Ruyter, Mike Friedman, Elisabeth C. Brüggen, Martin Wetzels, and Gerard Pfann (2013), “More Than Words: The Influence of Affective Content and Linguistic Style Matches in Online Reviews on Conversion Rates,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luffarelli, Jonathan, Antonios Stamatogiannakis, and Haiyang Yang (2019), “The Visual Asymmetry Effect: An Interplay of Logo Design and Brand Personality on Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (1), 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, Deborah J., and Linda L. Price (1987), “The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, Kaoime (2015), The Art of Theatrical Design: Elements of Visual Composition, Methods, and Practice. Burlington, MA: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazloom, Masoud, Robert Rietveld, Steven Rudinac, Marcel Worring, and Willemijn Van Dolen (2016), “Multimodal Popularity Prediction of Brand-Related Social Media Posts,” in Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, New York, NY: ACM, 197–201.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David G. Mick (1992), “On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Inquiry into Advertising Rhetoric,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (2), 180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David G. Mick (1996), “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (4), 424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and David G. Mick (1999), “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-Response Analyses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F., and Barbara J. Phillips (2005), “Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words,” Journal of advertising, 34 (2), 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mick, David G. (1992), “Levels of Subjective Comprehension in Advertising Processing and Their Relations to Ad Perceptions, Attitudes, and Memory,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (4), 411–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, Andrea C., On Amir, and Leonard Lee (2017), “Keeping It Real in Experimental Research: Understanding When, Where, and How to Enhance Realism and Measure Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (2), 465–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, Thomas P., and Donna L. Hoffman (2009), “The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (1), 56–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peracchio, Laura A., and Joan Meyers-Levy (2005), “Using Stylistic Properties of Ad Pictures to Communicate with Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (1), 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara J. (2000), “The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Responses to Visual Ads,” Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara J., and Edward F. McQuarrie (2004), “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising,” Marketing Theory, 4 (1–2), 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pieters, Rik, Michel Wedel, and Rajeev Batra (2010), “The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity,” 74 (5), 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, Catriona (2017), “Why Visual Content Is a Social Media Secret Weapon,” Huffington Post, December 6, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/catriona-pollard/why-visual-content-is-a-s_b_7261876.html.
   Google Scholar
• Poor, Morgan, Adam Duhachek, and Shanker H. Krishnan (2013), “How Images of Other Consumers Influence Subsequent Taste Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (6), 124–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggeveen, Anne L., Ronald C. Goodstein, and Dhruv Grewal (2014), “Improving the Effect of Guarantees: The Role of a Retailer’s Reputation,” Journal of Retailing, 90 (1), 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, John R., and Larry Percy (1980), “Attitude Change through Visual Imagery in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 9 (2), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, John R., and Larry Percy (1983), “Visual Communication in Advertising,” in Information Processing Research in Advertising, R.J. Harris, ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 83–125.
   Google Scholar
• Schilperoord, Joost, Alfons Maes, and Helen Ferdinandusse (2009), “Perceptual and Conceptual Visual Rhetoric: The Case of Symmetric Object Alignment,” Metaphor and Symbol, 24 (3), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, Ann E., Ruchi R. Rikhi, and Sokiente W. Dagogo-Jack (2016), “The Ups and Downs of Visual Orientation: The Effects of Diagonal Orientation on Product Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26 (4), 496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan (2013), “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media: Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 29 (4), 217–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Yla R., and James W. Pennebaker (2010), “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29 (1), 24–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Shelley E., and Sherry K. Schneider (1989), “Coping and the Simulation of Events,” Social Cognition, 7 (2), 174–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, Mike, and Rob Ellis (1998), “On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (3), 830–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laer, Tom, Jennifer Edson Escalas, Stephan Ludwig, and Ellis A. van den Hende (2019), “What Happens in Vegas Stays on TripAdvisor? A Theory and Technique to Understand Narrativity in Consumer Reviews,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (2), 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rompay, Thomas J.L., Peter W. De Vries, and Xaviera G. van Venrooij (2010), “More Than Words: On the Importance of Picture–Text Congruence in the Online Environment,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24 (1), 22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel Ordenes, Francisco J., Dhruv Grewal, Stephan Ludwig, Ko de Ruyter, Dominik Mahr, and Martin Wetzels (2018), “Cutting through Content Clutter: How Speech and Image Acts Drive Consumer Sharing of Social Media Brand Messages,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (5), 988–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whissell, Cynthia (2009), “Using the Revised Dictionary of Affect in Language to Quantify the Emotional Undertones of Samples of Natural Language,” Psychological Reports, 105 (2), 509–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar