6,851
Views
124
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Elicitation Techniques: Getting People to Talk About Ideas They Don’t Usually Talk About

REFERENCES

  • An, S. (2009). Learning US history in an age of globalization and transnational migration. Journal of Curriculum Studies,41, 763–787. doi:10.1080/00220270903095993
  • Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research,9, 547–570. doi:10.1177/1468794109343625
  • Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Barton, K. C. (2005). “Best not to forget them”: Secondary students’ judgments of historical significance in Northern Ireland. Theory & Research in Social Education,33, 9–44. doi:10.1080/00933104.2005.10473270
  • Barton, K. C. (2008). Students’ ideas about history. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 239–258). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Barton, K. C. (2010, April). New Zealand students and historical agency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (1996). “Back when God was around and everything”: Elementary children’s understanding of historical time. American Educational Research Journal,33, 419–454. doi:10.3102/00028312033002419
  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (1998). “It wasn’t a good part of history”: Ambiguity and identity in middle grade students’ judgments of historical significance. Teachers College Record,99, 478–513.
  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2005). History, identity, and the school curriculum in Northern Ireland: An empirical study of secondary students’ ideas and perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies,37, 85–116. doi:10.1080/0022027032000266070
  • Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2010). “You can form your own point of view”: Internally persuasive discourse in Northern Ireland students’ encounters with history. Teachers College Record,112, 142–181.
  • Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  • Binford, M. B. (1984). Semi-projective methods, political attitudes, and political reasoning. Political Methodology,10, 413–446. doi:10.2307/25791242
  • Black, E. L. (1966). Nine modern poets: An anthology. London, England: Macmillan.
  • Borgatti, S. P. (1999). Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. In J. Schensul & M. Weeks (Eds.), The ethnographer’s toolkit, vol. 3: Enhanced ethnographic methods: Audiovisual techniques, focused group interviews, and elicitation techniques (pp. 115–151). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Burke, K. J., Green, S., & McKenna, M. K. (2014). A critical geographic approach to youth civic engagement: Reframing educational opportunity zones and the use of public spaces. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085914543670
  • Carlsson, B. (2001). Depicting experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,45, 125–143. doi:10.1080/00313830120052723
  • Catterall, M., & Ibbotson, P. (2000). Using projective techniques in education research. British Educational Research Journal,26, 245–256. doi:10.1080/01411920050000971
  • Collier Jr., J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method (Revised and expanded edition). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Cunningham, D. (2003). Professional practice and perspectives in the teaching of historical empathy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
  • Cunningham, D. (2006). Capturing candor: Accessing teachers’ thinking about the cultivation of historical empathy. In K. C. Barton (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 183–206). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Edmondson, K. (2000). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. Mintzes, J. Wandersee, & J. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding (pp. 19–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Eldén, S. (2013). Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and “children’s voices.” Childhood,20, 66–81. doi:10.1177/0907568212447243
  • Epstein, T. (2009). Interpreting national history: Race, identity, and pedagogy in classrooms and communities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Forer, B. R. (1960). Word association and sentence completion methods. In A. I. Rabin & M. R. Haworth (Eds.), Projective techniques with children (pp. 210–224). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gambill, R. (2014, November). “It’s not like they can beat you”: Living history experiences and historical understanding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College and University Faculty Assembly, Boston, MA.
  • Gates, M. (1976). Measuring peasant attitudes to modernisation: A projective method. Current Anthropology,17, 641–665.
  • Gillespie, C. A. (2010). How culture constructs our sense of neighborhood: Mental maps and children’s perceptions of place. Journal of Geography,109, 18–29. doi:10.1080/00221340903459447
  • Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldman, R. (1964). Religious thinking from childhood to adolescence. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Harper, D. (1988). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. The American Sociologist,19, 54–70. doi:10.1007/BF02692374
  • Harper, D. (1994). On the authority of the image: Visual methods at the crossroads. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 403–412). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies,17, 13–26. doi:10.1080/14725860220137345
  • Ho, L.-C. (2010). “Don’t worry, I’m not going to report you”: Education for citizenship in Singapore. Theory & Research in Social Education,38, 217–247. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473423
  • Hunter, P., & Farthing, B. (2008). Students think history and teachers learn. Set: Research Information for Teachers,1, 15–22.
  • Johnson, J. C., & Weller, S. C. (2002). Elicitation techniques for interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 491–514). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Levstik, L. S. (2001). Crossing the empty spaces: Perspective taking in New Zealand Adolescents’ understanding of national history. In O. L. Davis Jr., E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective-taking in the social studies (pp. 69–96). Lanhan, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (1996). “They still use some of their past”: Historical salience in elementary children’s chronological thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies,28, 531–576. doi:10.1080/0022027980280502
  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,1, 27–66. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.002
  • Lindzey, G. (1961). Projective techniques and cross-cultural research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal,29, 861–878. doi:10.1080/0141192032000137349
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought,21, 28–49.
  • Middaugh, E. (2009). Adolescent reasoning about civic and political engagement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  • Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (1998). Class line-ups, vernacular portraits and lasting impressions of school. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 197–213). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
  • Morrow, V. (1998). “If you were a teacher, it would be harder to talk to you”: Reflections on qualitative research with children in school. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice,1, 297–313. doi:10.1080/13645579.1998.10846882
  • Nuthall, G. (1999, April). How students learn: The validation of a model of knowledge acquisition using stimulated recall of the learning process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431 801)
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peck, C. L. (2010). “It’s not like [I’m] Chinese and Canadian. I am in between”: Ethnicity and students’ conceptions of historical significance. Theory & Research in Social Education,38, 574–617. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473440
  • Pike, S. (2011). “If you went out it would stick”: Irish children’s learning in their local environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,20, 139–159. doi:10.1080/10382046.2011.564787
  • Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Prosser, J. (1992). Personal reflections on the use of photography in an ethnographic case study. British Educational Research Journal,18, 397–411. doi:10.1080/0141192920180406
  • Prosser, J., & Schwartz, D. (1998). Photographs within the sociological research process. In J. Prosser (ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 115–130). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
  • Roos, G. (1998). Pile sorting: “Kids like candy.” In V. C. de Munck & E. J. Sobo (Eds.), Using methods in the field: A practical introduction and casebook (pp. 97–110). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1951). Word association and sentence completion methods. In H. H. Anderson & G. L. Anderson (Eds.), An introduction to projective techniques (pp. 279–311). New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ryle, A. (1975). Frames and cages: The repertory grid approach to human understanding. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Schratz, M., & Steiner-Löffler, U. (1998). Pupils using photographs in school self-evaluation. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 235–251). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
  • Schwartz, D. (1989). Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology,12, 119–154. doi:10.1007/BF00988995
  • Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Seixas, P. (1994). Students’ understanding of historical significance. Theory & Research in Social Education,22, 281–304. doi:10.1080/00933104.1994.10505726
  • Sinnema, C. (2010). Monitoring and evaluating curriculum implementation: Final evaluation report on the implementation of The New Zealand curriculum, 2008–2009. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  • Soley, L., & Smith, A. L. (2008). Projective techniques for social science and business research. Milwaukee, WI: Southshore Press.
  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Still, W. (1872). The underground railroad. Philadelphia, PA: Porter & Coates.
  • Terzian, S. G., & Yeager, E. A. (2007). “That’s when we became a nation”: Urban Latino adolescents and the designation of historical significance. Urban Education,42, 52–81. doi:10.1177/0042085906294027
  • Tobin, J. (2000). “Good guys don’t wear hats”: Children’s talk about the media. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Tobin, J., & Davidson, D. (1990). The ethics of polyvocal ethnography: Empowering vs. textualizing children and teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,3, 271–283. doi:10.1080/0951839900030305
  • Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tupper, J., Carson, T., Johnson, I., & Mangat, J. (2008). Building place: Students’ negotiation of spaces and citizenship in schools. Canadian Journal of Education,31, 1065–1092. doi:10.2307/20466739
  • VanSledright, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2000). Reconstructing Andrew Jackson: Prospective elementary teachers’ readings of revisionist history texts. Theory & Research in Social Education,28, 411–444. doi:10.1080/00933104.2000.10505915
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2002). Fifth graders investigating history in the classroom: Results from a researcher-practitioner design experiment. The Elementary School Journal,103, 131–160.
  • Wagner, J. (1979). Perceiving a planned community. In J. Wagner (Ed.), Images of information: Still photography in the social sciences (pp. 85–100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Waldron, F. (2006). Children as co-researchers: Developing a democratic research practice with children. In K. C. Barton (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 85–110). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Waldron, F., & Pike, S. (2006). What does it mean to be Irish? Children’s construction of national identity. Irish Educational Studies,25, 231–251. doi:10.1080/03323310600737586
  • Walker, R., & Widel, J. (1985). Using photographs in a discipline of words. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Field methods in the study of education (pp. 191–216). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.
  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior,24, 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309
  • Weinger, S. (2000). Economic status: Middle class and poor children’s views. Children and Society,14, 135–146. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00161.x
  • Weller, S. C., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic data collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Whyte, W. F. (1984). Learning from the field: A guide from experience. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Wineburg, S., & Monte-Sano, C. (2008). Who is a famous American? Charting historical memory across the generations. Phi Delta Kappan,89, 643–648. doi:10.1177/003172170808900907
  • Yeager, E. A., Foster, S. J., & Greer, J. (2002). How eighth graders in England and the United States view historical significance. Elementary School Journal,103, 199–219.
  • Yinger, R. J. (1986). Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,2, 263–282. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(86)80007-5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.