11,594
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Toward Historical Perspective Taking: Students’ Reasoning When Contextualizing the Actions of People in the Past

References

  • Achinstein, B., & Fogo, B. (2015). Mentoring novices’ teaching of historical reasoning: Opportunities for pedagogical content knowledge development through mentor-facilitated practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.002
  • Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008010
  • Angvik, M., & Von Borries, B. (1997). A comparative European survey on historical consciousness and political attitudes among adolescents. Hamburg, Germany: Körber Stiftung.
  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). The Australian Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au
  • Bain, R., & Mirel, J. (2006). Setting up camp at the great instructional divide educating beginning history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 212–219. doi:10.1177/0022487105285892
  • Barton, K. C. (1997). “Bossed around by the queen”: Elementary students’ understanding of individuals and institutions in history. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12, 290–314.
  • Barton, K. C. (2012). Agency, choice and historical action: How history teaching can help students think about democratic decision making. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 7, 131–142. doi:10.1386/ctl.7.2.131_1
  • Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bermúdez, A., & Jaramillo, R. (2001). Development of historical explanation in children, adolescents and adults. In A. Dickinson, P. Gordon, & P. Lee (Eds.), Raising standards in history education (pp. 146−167). London, UK: Woburn Press.
  • Berti, A. E., Baldin, I., & Toneatti, L. (2009). Empathy in history. Understanding a past institution (ordeal) in children and young adults when description and rationale are provided. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 278–288. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.002
  • Bevir, M. (2002). How to be an intentionalist. History and Theory, 41, 209–217. doi:10.1111/0018-2656.00200
  • Beyer, B. K. (2008). How to teach thinking skills in social studies and history. The Social Studies, 99, 196–201. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.5.196-201
  • Birch, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychological Science, 18, 382–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01909.x
  • Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77, 25–31. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00096-2
  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Breakstone, J. (2014). Try, try, try again: The process of designing new history assessments. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 453–485. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.965860
  • Breakstone, J., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. S. (2013). Beyond the bubble in history/social studies assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(5), 53–57. doi:10.1177/003172171309400512
  • Brooks, S. (2008). Displaying historical empathy: What impact can a writing assignment have. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3, 130–146.
  • Brooks, S. (2011). Historical empathy as perspective recognition and care in one secondary social studies classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39, 166–202. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473452
  • Cooper, H., & Chapman, A. (Eds.). (2009). Constructing history 11–19. London, UK: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cunningham, D. L. (2009). An empirical framework for understanding how teachers conceptualize and cultivate historical empathy in students. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 679–709. doi:10.1080/00220270902947376
  • Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Dawson, I. (2009). What time does that tune start? From thinking about “sense of period” to modelling history at key stage 3. Teaching History, 135, 50–57.
  • De Keyser, R., & Vandepitte, P. (Eds.). (1998). Historical formation. Design of vision. Brussels, Belgium: Flemish Board for Catholic Secondary Education.
  • Den Heyer, K. (2003). Between every “now” and “then”: A role for the study of historical agency in history and citizenship education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31, 411–434. doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473232
  • Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: History programmes of study. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum
  • Doppen, F. H. (2000). Teaching and learning multiple perspectives: The atomic bomb. The Social Studies, 91, 159–169. doi:10.1080/00377990009602461
  • Endacott, J. L., & Brooks, S. (2013). An updated theoretical and practical model for promoting historical empathy. Social Studies Research & Practice, 8, 41–58.
  • Endacott, J. L., & Pelekanos, C. (2015). Slaves, women, and war! Engaging middle school students in historical empathy for enduring understanding. The Social Studies, 106, 1–7. doi:10.1080/00377996.2014.957378
  • Endacott, J. L., & Sturtz, J. (2014). Historical empathy and pedagogical reasoning. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2014.05.003
  • Ercikan, K., & Seixas, P. (Eds.). (2015). New directions in assessing historical thinking. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Evans, R. W. (2011). The hope for American school reform: The cold war pursuit of inquiry learning in social studies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Foster, S. J., & Yeager, E. A. (1999). “You’ve got to put together the pieces”: English 12-year-olds encounter and learn from historical evidence. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14, 286–317.
  • Foster, S. J., & Yeager, E. A. (2001). The role of empathy in the development of historical understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 13–21). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Grant, S., & Gradwell, J. (2010). Teaching with big ideas: Cases of ambitious teaching. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Hallam, R. (1970). Piaget and thinking in history. In M. Ballard (Ed.), New movements in the study and teaching of history (pp. 162–178). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Hartmann, U., & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). Historical perspective taking. A standardized measure for an aspect of students’ historical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 264–270. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.002
  • Havekes, H., Coppen, P. A., Luttenberg, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2012). Knowing and doing history: A conceptual framework and pedagogy for teaching historical contextualisation. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 11(2), 72–93.
  • Haydn, T., Stephen, A., Arthur, J., & Hunt, M. (2015). Learning to teach history in the secondary school: A companion to school experience. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Huijgen, T., & Holthuis, P. (2015). ‘Why am I accused of being a heretic?’ A pedagogical framework for stimulating historical contextualisation. Teaching History, 158, 56–61.
  • Huijgen, T., Van Boxtel, C., Van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2014). Testing elementary and secondary school students’ ability to perform historical perspective taking: The constructing of valid and reliable measure instruments. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 653–672. doi:10.1007/s10212-014-0219-4
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38, 37–51. doi:10.3102/0013189X08330540
  • Kennedy, J. (1983). Assessing the relationship between information processing capacity and historical understanding. Theory & Research in Social Education, 11, 1–22. doi:10.1080/00933104.1983.10505446
  • Kitson, A., Husbands, C., & Steward, S. (2011). Teaching and learning history 11–18: Understanding the past. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  • Kohlmeier, J. (2006). “Couldn’t she just leave?”: The relationship between consistently using class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9th grade world history course. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34, 34–57. doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473297
  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking, and rational understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21–50). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Lee, P., Dickinson, A., & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”: Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 233–244. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89731-5
  • Lévesque, S. (2008). Thinking historically. Educating students for the twenty-first century. Toronto, ON, Canada: Toronto University Press.
  • Levstik, L. S. (2001). Crossing the empty spaces: New Zealand adolescents’ understanding of perspective-taking and historical significance. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 69–96). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Levstik, L. S. (2011). Learning history. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction ( pp. 108–126). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Levstik, L. S., & Groth, J. (2002). “Scary thing, being an eighth grader”: Exploring gender and sexuality in a middle school US history unit. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30, 233–254. doi:10.1080/00933104.2002.10473193
  • Macpherson, I., Brooker, R., & Ainsworth, P. (2000). Case study in the contemporary world of research: Using notions of purpose, place, process and products to develop some principles for practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 49–61. doi:10.1080/136455700294923
  • Muhr, T. (1991). Atlas/ti—a prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qualitative Sociology, 14, 349–371. doi:10.1007/BF00989645
  • National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
  • Peck, C., & Seixas, P. (2008). Benchmarks of historical thinking: First steps. Canadian Journal of Education, 31, 1015–1038.
  • Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365–395. doi:10.1080/07370008.1993.9649030
  • Rantala, J. (2011). Assessing historical empathy through simulation—How do Finnish teacher students achieve contextual historical empathy? Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 1, 58–76.
  • Reich, G. A. (2009). Testing historical knowledge: Standards, multiple-choice questions and student reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37, 325–360. doi:10.1080/00933104.2009.10473401
  • Reisman, A., & Wineburg, S. S. (2008). Teaching the skill of contextualizing in history. The Social Studies, 99, 202–207. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.5.202-207
  • Riley, K. L. (1998). Historical empathy and the holocaust: Theory into practice. International Journal of Social Education, 13(1), 32–42.
  • Rothstein, R. (2004). We are not ready to assess history performance. The Journal of American History, 90, 1381–1391. doi:10.2307/3660358
  • Rüsen, J. (2004). How to overcome ethnocentrism: Approaches to a culture of recognition by history in the twenty first century. History and Theory, 43, 118–129. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00301.x
  • Seixas, P. (1996). Conceptualizing the growth of historical understanding. In D. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 765−783). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto, ON, Canada: Nelson Education.
  • Seixas, P., & Peck, C. (2004). Teaching historical thinking. In A. Sears & I. Wright (Eds.), Challenges and prospects for Canadian social studies (pp. 109–117). Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.
  • Sewell, W. H. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shemilt, D. (1983). The devil’s locomotive. History and Theory, 22, 1–18. doi:10.2307/2505213
  • Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 141–209). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Skolnick, J., Dulberg, N., & Maestre, T. (2004). Through other eyes: Developing empathy and multicultural perspectives in the social studies. Toronto, ON, Canada: Pippin.
  • Statistics Netherlands. (2014). Secondary education in the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.nl
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tully, J. (Ed.). (1988). Meaning and context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Van Boxtel, C., & Grever, M. (2011). Between disenchantment and high expectations. History education in the Netherlands, ca. 1968–2008. In E. Erdmann & W. Hasberg (Eds.), Facing—mapping—bridging diversity. Foundation of a European discourse on history education (pp. 83–116). Schwalbach, Germany: Wochenschau-Verlag.
  • Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J. (2012). “That’s in the time of the Romans!” Knowledge and strategies students use to contextualize historical images and documents. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 113–145. doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.661813
  • Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
  • Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2001). From empathic regard to self-understanding: Im/Positionality, empathy, and historical contextualization. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager Jr., & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 51−68). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2002). Fifth graders investigating history in the classroom: Results from a researcher-practitioner design experiment. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 131–160. doi:10.1086/499720
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2008). Narratives of nation-state, historical knowledge, and school history education. Review of Research in Education, 32, 109–146. doi:10.3102/0091732X07311065
  • VanSledright, B. A. (2013). Assessing historical thinking and understanding. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Virja, A., & Kouki, E. (2014). Dimensions of historical empathy in upper secondary students’ essays. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 2, 137–160.
  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304
  • Wils, K., & Verschaffel, T. (2012). Longing for the present in the history of history education. Paedagogica Historica, 48, 793–799. doi:10.1080/00309230.2012.739182
  • Wilschut, A. (2012). Images of time: The role of a historical consciousness of time in learning history. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
  • Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.