Examining the relationship between teachers’ discussion facilitation and their students’ reasoning

References

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problem of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickmore, K., & Parker, C. (2014). Constructive talk in classrooms: Divergent approaches to addressing divergent perspectives. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 291–335. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.901199
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2004). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31, 71–103. doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, S. E., & Gorman, J. M. (2017). Denying to the grave: Why we ignore the facts that will save us. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjioannou, X. (2007). Bringing the background to the foreground: What do classroom environments that support authentic discussions look like? American Educational Research Journal, 44, 370–399. doi:10.3102/0002831207302173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Hetherington, J. M. (2012, September 17). Look how far we’ve come apart. New York Times. Retrieved from http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/author/jonathan-haidt/
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1996). Assessing discussion of public issues: A scoring guide. In R. W. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (pp. 289–297). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., & Yocum, M. (2000). Powerful and authentic social studies: A professional development program for teachers. Washington, DC: National Council of Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30, 10–41. doi:10.1080/00933104.2002.10473177
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., Van Hover, S., Doolittle, P. E., & VanFossen, P. (2012). Learning social studies: An evidence-based approach. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 3: Application to learning and teaching (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2008). Facilitating historical discussion using asynchronous communication: The role of the teacher. Theory And Research in Social Education, 36, 317–355. doi:10.1080/00933104.2008.10473379
   Google Scholar
• Kisa, M. T., & Stein, M. K. (2015). Learning to see teaching in new ways: A foundation for maintaining cognitive demand. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 105–136. doi:10.3102/0002831214549452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlmeier, J. (2006). Couldn’t she just leave? The relationship between consistently using class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9th grade world history course. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34, 34–57. doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473297
   Google Scholar
• Kohlmeier, J., & Saye, J. W. (2014a). Ethical reasoning of high school seniors exploring issues of free speech. Social Studies Research and Practice, 9, 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlmeier, J., & Saye, J. W. (2014b). Ethical reasoning of U.S. high school seniors exploring just v. unjust laws. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 548–578. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.966218
   Google Scholar
• Kohlmeier, J., & Saye, J. W. (2016). Developing discussion leaders through scaffolded lesson study. The Social Studies, 108, 22–37. doi:10.1080/00377996.2016.1237466
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Carmichael, D. L. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment: Common standards for rigor and relevance in teaching academic subjects. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., & Oliver, D. W. (1970). Clarifying public controversy: An approach to teaching social studies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., & Carbonaro, W. (1998). Towards an ecology of learning: The case of classroom discourse and its effects on writing in high school English and social studies. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, D. W., & Shaver, J. P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2001). Teaching teachers to lead discussion: Democratic education in content and method. In J. J. Patrick & R. S. Leming (Eds.), Principles and practices of democracy in the education of social studies teachers: Civic learning in teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 111–133). Bloomington, IN: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2008). Knowing and doing in democratic citizenship education. In L. Levstik & C. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C., & Hess, D. (2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 273–289. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00057-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2015). Entering the historical problem space: Whole-class text-based discussion in history class. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347–376. doi:10.1177/0090591797025003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saye, J. W., & SSIRC. (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41, 89–132. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.756785
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hover, S., & Hicks, D. (2017). Social constructivism and student learning in social studies. In M. M. Manfra & C. M. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 270–318). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar