1,386
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Confronting settler colonialism: Theoretical and methodological questions about social studies research

&

References

  • Aghasaleh, R., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2014). A reader's guide to post-qualitative inquiry proposals. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/3OC5b2
  • Anderson, C. B. (2012). Misplaced multiculturalism: Representations of American Indians in U.S. history academic standards. Curriculum Inquiry, 42, 497–509. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00604.x
  • Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). (2008). Doing narrative research. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Arvin, M., Tuck, E., & Morrill, A. (2013). Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations, 25, 8–34. doi:10.1353/ff.2013.0006
  • Barton, K. C. (2006). Introduction. In K. C. Barton (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 1–10). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Battiste, M. (2008). Research ethics for protecting Indigenous knowledge and heritage: Institutional and researcher responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 497–510). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Bickmore, K. (2008). Social justice and the social studies. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Biolsi, T. (2005). Imagined geographies: Sovereignty, Indigenous space, and American Indian struggle. American Ethnologist, 32, 239–259. doi:10.1525/ae.2005.32.2.239
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Brayboy, B. M. J. (2006). Toward a tribal critical race theory of education. The Urban Review, 37, 425–446. doi:10.1007/s11256-0050018-y
  • Brown, R. N., Carducci, R., & Kuby, C. R. (2014). Introduction. In R. N. Brown, R. Carducci, & C. R. Kuby (Eds.), Disrupting qualitative inquiry: Possibilities and tensions in educational research (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Byrd, J. A. (2011). The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Calderón, D. (2009). Making explicit the jurisprudential foundations of multiculturalism: The continuing challenges of colonial education in US schooling for Indigenous education. In A. Kempf (Ed.), Breaking the colonial contract: Anti-colonialism in the US and Canada (pp. 53–77). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Carey, L. J. (2004). Always already colonizer/colonized: White Australian wanderings. In K. Mutua & B. B. Swadener (Eds.), Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives (pp. 69–83). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78, 941–993. doi:10.3102/0034654308323036
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Cherryholmes, C. G. (2006). Researching social studies in the postmodern: An introduction. In A. Segall, E. E. Heilman, & C. H. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies: The next generation (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Crocco, M. S. (2006). The invisible hand of theory in social studies education. In A. Segall, E. E. Heilman, & C. H. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies: The next generation (pp. 231–236). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Crow, M. (2017). Atlantic North America from contact to the late twentieth century. In E. Cavanaugh & L. Veracini (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the history of settler colonialism (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Debo, A. (1940). And still the waters run: The betrayal of the five civilized tribes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2015). Introduction: Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 9–26). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: Critical methodologies and Indigenous inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Diaz-Strong, D., Luna-Duarte, M., Gómez, C., & Meiners, E. R. (2014). Too close to the work/there is nothing right now. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Dinkelman, T., & Cuenca, C. (2017). Qualitative inquiry in social studies research. In M. M. Manfra & C. M. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 95–131). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Dippie, B. W. (1982). The vanishing American: White attitudes & U.S. Indian policy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  • Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2002). One or two things I know about us: Rethinking the image and role of the “Okies.” Monthly Review, 54(3), 13–28. doi:10.14452/MR-054-03-2002-07
  • Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2014). An Indigenous people’s’ history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon.
  • Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2014). Decolonial options and artistic/aestheSic entanglements: An interview with Walter Mignolo. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3, 196–212.
  • Geneser, V. L. (2011). Native transgressions: A look at the portrayal of Karankawa natives in Texas history textbooks and trade books. American Educational History Journal, 38, 219–236.
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. (Original work published 1967)
  • Goldstein, A. (2014). Toward a genealogy of the U.S. colonial present. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Formations of United States colonialism (pp. 1–30). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Hixon, W. L. (2013). American settler colonialism: A history. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Houser, N. O., Krutka, D. G., Province Roberts, R., Pennington, K., & Faili Coerver, N. (2017). Navigating the reform–Accountability culture in Oklahoma Social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45, 7–42. doi:10.1080/00933104.2016.1213213
  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Journell, W. (2009). An incomplete history: Representations of American Indians in state social studies standards. Journal of American Indian Education, 48(2), 18–32. doi:10.3200/TSSS.100.4.160-168
  • Kaomea, J. (2005). Indigenous studies in the elementary curriculum: A cautionary Hawaiian example. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, 24–42. doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.024
  • Kaomea, J. (2016). Qualitative analysis of Ho‘oku‘iku‘i or bricolage: Teaching emancipatory Indigenous research in postcolonial Hawai’i. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 99–106. doi:10.1177/1077800415620222
  • Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers, and profound benefits. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 135–156). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Kovatch, M. (2010). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Krippendorf, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kuby, C. R., Aguayo, R. C., Holloway, N., Mulligan, J., Shear, S. B., & Ward, A. (2016). Teaching, troubling, transgressing: Thinking with theory in a post-qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 140–148. doi:10.1177/1077800415617206
  • Kuntz, A. M. (2015). The responsible methodologist: Inquiry, truth-telling, and social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lahti, J. (2017). Introduction: What is settler colonialism and what it has to do with the American west? Journal of the West, 56(4), 8–16.
  • Landry, A. (2017, April 22). Native history: Land rush for Oklahoma Indian Territory begins. Indian Country Today. Retrieved from https://newsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/archive/native-history-land-rush-for-oklahoma-indian-territory-begins-zyaP2-UBRE2EQitF83mnrw/
  • Lipka, J., & McCarty, T. (1994). Changing the culture of schooling: Navajo and Yup’ik cases. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25, 266–284. doi:10.1525/aeq.1994.25.3.04x0144n
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • McCaslin, W. D., & Breton, D. C. (2008). Justice as healing: Going outside the colonizers’ cage. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 511–530). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Miller, R. J. (2005). Tribal cultural self-determination and the makah whaling culture. In J. Barker (Ed.), Sovereignty matters: Locations of contestation and possibility in indigenous struggles for self-determination (pp. 123–152). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Milner, H. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07309471
  • Moore, T. J., & Clark, B. (2004). The impact of “message senders” on what is true: Native Americans in Nebraska history books. Multicultural Perspectives, 6(2), 17–23. doi:10.1207/s15327892mcp0602_4
  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2016). Federal and state recognized tribes. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/state-tribal-institute/list-of-federal-and-state-recognized-tribes.aspx
  • National Congress of American Indians. (2018). NCAI congratulates tribal nations in Virginia on Federal Recognition. Retrieved from http://www.ncai.org/news/articles/2018/01/30/ncai-congratulates-tribal-nations-in-virginia-on-federal-recognition
  • Oto, R. (in press). Review of the book Toward what justice: Describing diverse dreams of justice in education by E. Tuck & K. W. Yang. Journal of Social Studies Research. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2018.09.009
  • Parding, K. (2013). The need for learning arenas: Non-Indigenous teachers working in Indigenous school contexts. Education, Citizenship, and Social Justice, 8, 242–253. doi:10.1177/1746197913475763
  • Patel, L. (2016). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to accountability. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Reid, J. G., & Peace, T. (2017). Colonies of settlement and settler colonialism in Northeastern North America, 1450-1850. In E. Cavanaugh & L. Veracini (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the history of settler colonialism (pp. 79–94). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Riessman, C. K. (2007). Narrative methods for the human sciences. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Ríos, F. A., McDaniel, J. E., & Stowell, L. P. (1996). Making the path by walking it. Teacher Education Quarterly, 23(3), 23–36.
  • Sabzalian, L. (in press). Indigenous children’s survivance in public schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sabzalian, L., & Shear, S. B. (2018). Confronting colonial blindess in citizenship education: Recognizing colonization, self-determination, and sovereignty as core knowledge for elementary social studies teacher education. In S. B. Shear, C. M. Tschida, E. Bellows, L. B. Buchanan, & E. E. Saylor (Eds.), (Re)imagining elementary social studies: A controversial issues reader (pp. 153–176). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Savage, W. W., Jr. (2015, September 3). Better to be Okies than Boomers and Sooners. NonDoc. Retrieved from https://nondoc.com/2015/09/03/better-to-be-okies-than-boomers-and-sooners/
  • Segall, A. (2013). Revitalizing critical discourses in social education: Opportunities for a more complexified (un)knowing. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41, 476–493. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.836382
  • Shear, S. B., Knowles, R. T., Soden, G. J., & Castro, A. J. (2015). Manifesting destiny: Re/presentations of Indigenous peoples in K-12 U.S. history standards. Theory & Research in Social Studies Education, 43, 68–101. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.999849
  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Indigenous methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Souto-Manning, M. (2014). Critical for whom?: Theoretical and methodological dilemmas in critical approaches to language research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 201–222). New York, NY: Sage.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). Untraining educational researchers. Research in Education, 96, 6–11. doi: 10.1177/0034523716664581
  • St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, Y. A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719. doi:10.1177/1077800414532435
  • St. Pierre, E. A., & Roulston, K. (2006). The state of qualitative inquiry: A contested science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 673–684. doi:10.1080/09518390600975644
  • Stanton, C. R. (2012). Hearing the story: Critical Indigenous curriculum inquiry and primary source representation in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40, 339–370. doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.723242
  • Stanton, C. R. (2014a). Crossing methodological borders: Decolonizing community-based participatory research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 573–583. doi:10.1177/1077800413505541
  • Stanton, C. R. (2014b). The curricular Indian agent: Discursive colonization and Indigenous (dys)agency in U.S. history textbooks. Curriculum Inquiry, 44, 649–676. doi:10.1111/curi.12064
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tuck, E., & Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2013). Curriculum, replacement, and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29, 72–89.
  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1–40.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 811–818. doi:10.1177/1077800414530265
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2018a). Introduction: Born under the rising sign of social justice. In E. Tuck & K. W. Yang (Eds.), Toward what justice?: Describing diverse dreams of justice in education (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2018b). Series editors’ introduction. In L. T. Smith, E. Tuck, & K. W. Yang (Eds.), Indigenous and decolonizing studies in education: Mapping the long view (pp. x–xxi). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tyson, C. A. (2006). Research, race, and social education. In K. C. Barton (Ed.), Research methods in social studies education: Contemporary issues and perspectives (pp. 39–56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Vegh-Williams, S. (2013). Outsider teacher/Insider knowledge: Fostering Mohawk cultural competency for non-Native teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 40, 25–43.
  • Veracini, L. (2015). The settler colonial present. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Veracini, L. (2017). Introduction. In E. Cavanaugh & L. Veracini (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the history of settler colonialism (pp. 1–8). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Walter, M. (2006). The nature of social science research. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods: An Australian perspective (pp. 1–29). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
  • Walter, M., & Anderson, C. (2016). Indigenous statistics: A quantitative research methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ward, A. (2015). Becoming subjectivities: Academic women in art education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
  • Whetung, M., & Wakefield, S. (2018). Colonial conventions: Institutionalized research relationships and decolonizing research ethics. In L. T. Smith, E. Tuck, & K. W. Yang (Eds.), Indigenous and decolonizing studies in education: Mapping the long view (pp. 146–158). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.
  • Winn, M. T. (2014). Introduction to part 1. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 1–2). New York, NY: Sage.
  • Wolcott, R. (2018). Against social justice and the limits of diversity: Or Black people and freedom. In E. Tuck & K. W. Yang (Eds.), Toward what justice?: Describing diverse dreams of justice in education (pp. 85–100). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler-colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8, 387–409. doi:10.1080/14623520601056240
  • Yazzie-Mintz, T. (2007). From a place deep inside: Culturally appropriate curriculum as the embodiment of Navajo-ness in classroom pedagogy. Journal of American Indian Education, 46(3), 72–93.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Zapata, A., & Van Horn, S. (2017). “Because I’m smooth”: Material intra-actions and text productions among young Latino picture book makers. Research in the Teaching of English, 51, 290–316.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.