Managing an unpopular opinion in a controversial political issue discussion

References

• Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 436–456). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Avery, P. G. (2016). Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 985–1038). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988-2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, T. A. (2003). “If he murdered someone, he shouldn’t get a lawyer”: Engaging young children in civics deliberation. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31, 327–347. doi:10.1080/00933104.2003.10473228
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T. A. (2013). Identity, discourse, and safety in a high school discussion of same-sex marriage. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41, 1–32. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.757759
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, F. (2011, October 31). Race, religion and same-sex marriage. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/opinion/bruni-same-sex-marriage-and-blacks.html
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and sexuality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas, and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In H. T. Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241–259). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, W. N., Jr. (2013). Backlash politics: How constitutional litigation has advanced marriage equality in the United States. Boston University Law Review, 93, 275–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettelbrick, P. (1989). Since when is marriage a path to liberation? OUT/LOOK National Gay and Lesbian Quarterly, 6, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Finegan, E. (2004). Language: Its structure and use. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, N. K. (2009). Toward democratic discourse: Scaffolding student-led discussions in the social studies. Teachers College Record, 111, 2021–2054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, J., & Liptak, A. (2014, January 6). Justices’ halt to gay marriage leaves Utah couples in limbo. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/07/us/justices-block-gay-marriage-in-utah-pending-appeal.html
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, A. (2000). High school democratic dialogues: Possibilities for praxis. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 67–91. doi:10.3102/00028312037001067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2000). Developing strong voters through democratic deliberation. Social Education, 64, 293–296.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2008). Controversial issues and democratic discourse. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 124–136). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E., & Posselt, J. (2002). How high school students experience and learn from the discussion of controversial public issues. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17, 283–314.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, L.-C., McAvoy, P., Hess, D., & Gibbs, B. (2017). Teaching and learning about controversial issues and topics in the social studies. In M. M. Manfra & C. M. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 321–335). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Horton-Salway, M. (2001). The construction of M.E.: The discursive action model. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 147–188). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• James, J. H. (2010). “Democracy is the devil’s snare”: Theological certainty in teacher education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38, 618–639. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473441
   Google Scholar
• James, J. H., Schweber, S., Kunzman, R., Barton, K. C., & Logan, K. (2015). Religion in the classroom: Dilemmas for democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2012). Ideological homogeneity, school leadership, and political intolerance in secondary education: A study of three high schools during the 2008 Presidential election. Journal of School Leadership, 22, 569–599.
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2017). Politically conservative preservice teachers and the spiral of silence: Implications for teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(2), 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2018). Should marriage equality be taught as controversial post-Obergefell v Hodges? Teachers College Record, 120(8), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen v. Herbert, 2:13-DV-00217 (10th Cir. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kunzman, R. (2006a). The civic (and pedagogical) virtue of recognizing reasonable disagreement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34, 162–182. doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473303
   Google Scholar
• Kunzman, R. (2006b). Grappling with the good: Talking about religion and morality in public schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzman, R. (2015). Talking with students who already know the answer: Navigating ethical certainty in democratic dialogue. In J. H. James, S. Schweber, R. Kunzman, K. C. Barton, & K. Logan (Eds.), Religion in the classroom: Dilemmas for democratic education (pp. 79–89). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence v. Texas. (2003). 539 US 558.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, M. (2012a). Diversity and civic education. In D. E. Campbell, M. Levinson, & F. M. Hess (Eds.), Making civics count: Citizenship education for a new generation (pp. 89–114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, M. (2012b). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, J. (2011). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66, 762–782. doi:10.2307/3088957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker, K. (2006). When sex goes to school: Waring views on sex–And sex education–Since the sixties. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2004). Discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S., & Rosenthal, D. (2006). Sexuality in adolescence: Current trends. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion–Our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obergefell v. Hodges. (2015). 576 US_.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2001). Educating democratic citizens: A broad view. Theory into Practice, 40, 6–13. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2006). Talk isn’t cheap: Practicing deliberation in school. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 19(1), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2010). Listening to strangers: Classroom discussion in democratic education. Teachers College Record, 112, 2815–2832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C., & Hess, D. E. (2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 273–289. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00057-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsof, D., & Haselton, M. (2016). The political divide over same-sex marriage: Mating strategies in conflict? Psychological Science, 27, 435–442. doi:10.1177/0956797615621719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of Utah. (2014). Brief of appellants Gary R. Herbert and Sean D. Reyes. U.S. Court of Appeals for 10th Circuit, Case 13-4178.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (2011). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (2016). Introduction: The evolution of discursive psychology: From classic to contemporary themes. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive pscyhology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 1–11). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Windsor. (2013). 570 US_.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar