On ethical judgments in history education: A response to Milligan, Gibson, and Peck

References

• Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil (P. Hallward, Trans.). London, UK: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Säfström, C. A. (2011). A manifesto for education. Policy Futures in Education, 9, 540–547. doi:10.2304/pfie.2011.9.5.540
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. (2005). “A nice little wife to make things pleasant”: Portrayals of women in social studies textbooks. McGill Journal of Education, 40, 241–265.
   Google Scholar
• Cutrara, S. A. (2018). The settler grammar of Canadian history curriculum: Why historical thinking is unable to respond to the TRC’s calls to action. Canadian Journal of Education, 41, 250–275.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2002). Constructivist discourses and the field of education: Problems and possibilities. Educational Theory, 52, 409–428. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00409.x
   Google Scholar
• Dei, J. S. (1999). The denial of difference: Refraining anti-racist praxis. Race Ethnicity and Education, 2, 17–38. doi:10.1080/1361332990020103
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2009). What if curriculum (of a certain kind) doesn’t matter? Curriculum Inquiry, 39(1), 27–40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2008.01435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2012). History education as a disciplinary ethic of truths. In P. Clark (Ed.), New Possibilities for the past: Shaping history education in Canada (pp. 154–172). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2014). Editor’s introduction: Roger I. Simon. Canadian Social Studies, 47(2), 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2015). An analysis of aims and the educational event. Canadian Journal of Education, 38, 1–22. doi:10.2307/canajeducrevucan.38.2.13
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2017a). Doing better than just falling forward: Linking subject matter with explicit futures thinking. One World in Dialogue, 4, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2017b). A thinking education. Critical Education, 8(12), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K. (2018). Historical agency: Stories of choice, action, and social change. In S. A. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 227–252). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• den Heyer, K., & Abbott, L. (2011). Reverberating echoes: Challenging teacher candidates to tell and learn from entwined narrations of Canadian history. Curriculum Inquiry, 41, 610–635. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, T. (1998). Deconstructing differences in African American and European American adolescents’ perspectives on United States History. Curriculum Inquiry, 28, 397–423. doi:10.1111/0362-6784.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104, 331–349. doi:10.1007/BF01064504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2016). Teacher political disclosure as parrhesia. Teachers College Record, 118(5), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, E., Scott, J. W., & Wilder, G. (2018). Thesis on theory and history. Theory Revolt. Retrieved from www.Theoryrevolt.com
   Google Scholar
• Létourneau, J. (2006). Remembering our past: An examination of the historical memory of young Québécois. In R. Sandwell (Ed.), To the past: History education, public memory & citizenship in Canada (pp. 71–87). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malewski, E. (2013). Do Stemhagen, Reich, and Muth have ears to hear and eyes to see? Toward the subaltern and counternarratives in curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10, 73–88. doi:10.1080/15505170.2013.792755
   Google Scholar
• Marker, M. (2011). Teaching history from an Indigenous perspective: Four winding paths up the mountain. In P. Clark (Ed.), New possibilities for the past: Shaping history education in Canada (pp. 97–114). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, I. (2000). The liberal order framework: A prospectus for a reconnaissance of Canadian history. Canadian Historical Review, 81, 617–645. doi:10.3138/chr.81.4.616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, A., Gibson, L., & Peck, C. L. (2018). Enriching ethical judgments in history education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46, 449–479. doi:10.1080/00933104.2017.1389665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandwell, R. (2003). The limits of liberalism: The liberal reconnaissance and the history of the family in Canada. Canadian Historical Review, 84, 423–450. doi:10.3138/CHR.84.3.423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, C., & St. Denis, V. (2005). Troubling national discourses in anti-racist curricular planning. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 295–317. doi:10.2307/4126472
   Google Scholar
• Segall, A. (1999). Critical history: Implications for history/social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 27, 358–374. doi:10.1080/00933104.1999.10505885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segall, A., Trofanenko, B. M., & Schmitt, A. J. (2018). Critical theory and history education. In S. A. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2002). The purposes of teaching Canadian history. Canadian Social Studies, 36(2). Retrieved from https://canadian-social-studies-journal.educ.ualberta.ca/content/articles-2000-2010#ARpurposes_teaching_canadian_history119
   Google Scholar
• Sexias, P. (2000). Schweigen! Die Kinder! Or, does postmodern history have a place in the schools. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 19–37). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. I. (2005). The touch of the past: Remembrance, learning, and ethics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. (2006). Whose public? Whose memory? Racisms, grand narratives, and Canadian history. In R. W. Sandwell (Ed.), To the past: History education, public memory and citizenship in Canada (pp. 32–49). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. J., & Barton, K. C. (2010). Can history stand alone? Drawbacks and blind spots of a “disciplinary” curriculum. Teachers College Record, 112, 2471–2495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, G. (2004). The stones shall cry out: Consciousness, rocks, and Indians. Wicazo Sa Review, 19, 105–125. doi:10.1353/wic.2004.0027
   Google Scholar
• Trouillot, M. (1995). Silencing the past. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 409–428. doi:10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willinsky, J. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar